Profitability of Sector Mutual Funds and ETFs During Market Development and Length of Investment Horizon

M. Širůček, Jan Vystoupil, Petr Strejček
{"title":"Profitability of Sector Mutual Funds and ETFs During Market Development and Length of Investment Horizon","authors":"M. Širůček, Jan Vystoupil, Petr Strejček","doi":"10.5817/FAI2018-2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on the profitability of investments into IT, finance, healthcare and consumer goods oriented active and passive mutual funds and ETFs and their profit/loss in different market situations (growing, stagnant and decreasing markets).The aim of the paper is to set recommendations for investors as regards which instrument (active or passive mutual fund or ETFs) brings higher return or lower loss over the time and market development and if investors can expect different results based on the sector orientation, which sector is more sensitive to bullish or bearish trends. Our results show that neither ETF nor passive mutual funds were able to beat the market, as the sector index brings better results than these investments in all situations. Within bearish trend, all sector ETFs and passive mutual funds bring the same results as sector index, only active managed mutual funds bring better results. The lowest loss during this period was achieved by active managed mutual funds focusing on healthcare. Bullish and stagnant markets bring quite the same results, but passive funds and ETF are more profitable than active mutual funds in growing markets.","PeriodicalId":30338,"journal":{"name":"Financial Assets and Investing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Assets and Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/FAI2018-2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on the profitability of investments into IT, finance, healthcare and consumer goods oriented active and passive mutual funds and ETFs and their profit/loss in different market situations (growing, stagnant and decreasing markets).The aim of the paper is to set recommendations for investors as regards which instrument (active or passive mutual fund or ETFs) brings higher return or lower loss over the time and market development and if investors can expect different results based on the sector orientation, which sector is more sensitive to bullish or bearish trends. Our results show that neither ETF nor passive mutual funds were able to beat the market, as the sector index brings better results than these investments in all situations. Within bearish trend, all sector ETFs and passive mutual funds bring the same results as sector index, only active managed mutual funds bring better results. The lowest loss during this period was achieved by active managed mutual funds focusing on healthcare. Bullish and stagnant markets bring quite the same results, but passive funds and ETF are more profitable than active mutual funds in growing markets.
行业共同基金和ETF在市场发展过程中的盈利能力和投资期限
本文重点研究IT、金融、金融和金融领域投资的盈利能力,以医疗保健和消费品为导向的主动和被动共同基金和ETF及其在不同市场情况下的损益(增长、停滞和下降的市场)。本文的目的是为投资者提供建议,说明随着时间和市场发展,哪种工具(主动或被动共同基金或ETF)带来更高的回报或更低的损失,以及投资者是否可以根据行业方向预期不同的结果,哪个行业对看涨或看跌趋势更敏感。我们的结果表明,ETF和被动共同基金都无法击败市场,因为在所有情况下,行业指数都比这些投资带来更好的结果。在看跌趋势中,所有板块ETF和被动共同基金带来的结果与板块指数相同,只有主动管理的共同基金带来更好的结果。这一时期亏损最低的是专注于医疗保健的积极管理的共同基金。牛市和停滞的市场带来了完全相同的结果,但在不断增长的市场中,被动基金和ETF比主动共同基金更有利可图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信