Testing a medicine information needs identification tool (MINI-Q) with hospital inpatients in New Zealand

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Trudi Aspden BPharm(Hons), PhD, Michelle Honey RN, PhD, Sarah Sneyd BA, BHSc, MPH, Kim Brackley DipPharm(Dist), PGDipHighE, MScClinPharm, Alana Cavadino BSc, MSc, PhD, Rosalie Chang BPharm, PGCert, Amy HY Chan BPharm(Hons), PhD
{"title":"Testing a medicine information needs identification tool (MINI-Q) with hospital inpatients in New Zealand","authors":"Trudi Aspden BPharm(Hons), PhD,&nbsp;Michelle Honey RN, PhD,&nbsp;Sarah Sneyd BA, BHSc, MPH,&nbsp;Kim Brackley DipPharm(Dist), PGDipHighE, MScClinPharm,&nbsp;Alana Cavadino BSc, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Rosalie Chang BPharm, PGCert,&nbsp;Amy HY Chan BPharm(Hons), PhD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Determining an individual's medicines information preferences and needs could enable health professionals to deliver more effective medicines information and help build patients' health literacy and ability to self-manage their health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This descriptive, cross-sectional study aimed to test a new information needs assessment tool, the Medicine Information Needs for Individuals – Questionnaire (MINI-Q), which elicits what individuals want to know about their medicines. This study aimed to explore the face validity, acceptability, and feasibility of using the tool in a hospital inpatient setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Ethical approval was obtained from Health and Disability Ethics Committees (Reference no: 18/NTA/137). Following ethical approval, adult hospital inpatients from two service divisions in one large urban hospital in New Zealand were invited to self-assess their medicines information needs using the 23-item MINI-Q via a tablet or on paper. Descriptive statistics were generated from the quantitative data and responses to a free-text question were inductively analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The MINI-Q was completed by 228 inpatients, 137 (60%) of whom used a tablet. Participants requested information on 80.6% of the possible topics. The most common topic that participants wanted information about was possible side effects (92%). No additional topics to include in the MINI-Q were identified from the free-text responses. The median completion time of the tablet version was 9.2 min (interquartile range 6.7–14.6).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The MINI-Q shows promise to efficiently identify an individual's medicines information needs in an inpatient setting. The findings reinforce that most people want to know all the basic information about their medicines, with side effects being particularly important.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 5","pages":"248-255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1877","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Determining an individual's medicines information preferences and needs could enable health professionals to deliver more effective medicines information and help build patients' health literacy and ability to self-manage their health.

Aim

This descriptive, cross-sectional study aimed to test a new information needs assessment tool, the Medicine Information Needs for Individuals – Questionnaire (MINI-Q), which elicits what individuals want to know about their medicines. This study aimed to explore the face validity, acceptability, and feasibility of using the tool in a hospital inpatient setting.

Method

Ethical approval was obtained from Health and Disability Ethics Committees (Reference no: 18/NTA/137). Following ethical approval, adult hospital inpatients from two service divisions in one large urban hospital in New Zealand were invited to self-assess their medicines information needs using the 23-item MINI-Q via a tablet or on paper. Descriptive statistics were generated from the quantitative data and responses to a free-text question were inductively analysed.

Results

The MINI-Q was completed by 228 inpatients, 137 (60%) of whom used a tablet. Participants requested information on 80.6% of the possible topics. The most common topic that participants wanted information about was possible side effects (92%). No additional topics to include in the MINI-Q were identified from the free-text responses. The median completion time of the tablet version was 9.2 min (interquartile range 6.7–14.6).

Conclusion

The MINI-Q shows promise to efficiently identify an individual's medicines information needs in an inpatient setting. The findings reinforce that most people want to know all the basic information about their medicines, with side effects being particularly important.

Abstract Image

在新西兰的医院住院患者中测试药物信息需求识别工具(MINI‐Q)
确定个人的药物信息偏好和需求可以使卫生专业人员提供更有效的药物信息,并帮助培养患者的健康素养和自我管理健康的能力。这项描述性的横断面研究旨在测试一种新的信息需求评估工具,即个人药物信息需求问卷(MINI‐Q),该工具可以引出个人想要了解的药物信息。本研究旨在探讨在医院住院环境中使用该工具的面部有效性、可接受性和可行性。获得了健康和残疾伦理委员会的伦理批准(参考号:18/NTA/137)。在获得伦理批准后,来自新西兰一家大型城市医院两个服务部门的成年住院患者被邀请通过平板电脑或纸上使用23项MINI‐Q自我评估他们的药物信息需求。从定量数据中生成描述性统计数据,并对自由文本问题的回答进行归纳分析。MINI‐Q由228名住院患者完成,其中137人(60%)使用平板电脑。与会者要求提供80.6%的可能主题的信息。参与者想要了解的最常见的话题是可能的副作用(92%)。从自由文本回复中没有发现需要纳入MINI‐Q的其他主题。平板电脑版本的中位完成时间为9.2 min(四分位间距6.7-14.6)。MINI‐Q有望在住院环境中有效识别个人的药物信息需求。研究结果进一步表明,大多数人都想了解他们药物的所有基本信息,其中副作用尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信