Trudi Aspden BPharm(Hons), PhD, Michelle Honey RN, PhD, Sarah Sneyd BA, BHSc, MPH, Kim Brackley DipPharm(Dist), PGDipHighE, MScClinPharm, Alana Cavadino BSc, MSc, PhD, Rosalie Chang BPharm, PGCert, Amy HY Chan BPharm(Hons), PhD
{"title":"Testing a medicine information needs identification tool (MINI-Q) with hospital inpatients in New Zealand","authors":"Trudi Aspden BPharm(Hons), PhD, Michelle Honey RN, PhD, Sarah Sneyd BA, BHSc, MPH, Kim Brackley DipPharm(Dist), PGDipHighE, MScClinPharm, Alana Cavadino BSc, MSc, PhD, Rosalie Chang BPharm, PGCert, Amy HY Chan BPharm(Hons), PhD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Determining an individual's medicines information preferences and needs could enable health professionals to deliver more effective medicines information and help build patients' health literacy and ability to self-manage their health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This descriptive, cross-sectional study aimed to test a new information needs assessment tool, the Medicine Information Needs for Individuals – Questionnaire (MINI-Q), which elicits what individuals want to know about their medicines. This study aimed to explore the face validity, acceptability, and feasibility of using the tool in a hospital inpatient setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Ethical approval was obtained from Health and Disability Ethics Committees (Reference no: 18/NTA/137). Following ethical approval, adult hospital inpatients from two service divisions in one large urban hospital in New Zealand were invited to self-assess their medicines information needs using the 23-item MINI-Q via a tablet or on paper. Descriptive statistics were generated from the quantitative data and responses to a free-text question were inductively analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The MINI-Q was completed by 228 inpatients, 137 (60%) of whom used a tablet. Participants requested information on 80.6% of the possible topics. The most common topic that participants wanted information about was possible side effects (92%). No additional topics to include in the MINI-Q were identified from the free-text responses. The median completion time of the tablet version was 9.2 min (interquartile range 6.7–14.6).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The MINI-Q shows promise to efficiently identify an individual's medicines information needs in an inpatient setting. The findings reinforce that most people want to know all the basic information about their medicines, with side effects being particularly important.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 5","pages":"248-255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1877","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Determining an individual's medicines information preferences and needs could enable health professionals to deliver more effective medicines information and help build patients' health literacy and ability to self-manage their health.
Aim
This descriptive, cross-sectional study aimed to test a new information needs assessment tool, the Medicine Information Needs for Individuals – Questionnaire (MINI-Q), which elicits what individuals want to know about their medicines. This study aimed to explore the face validity, acceptability, and feasibility of using the tool in a hospital inpatient setting.
Method
Ethical approval was obtained from Health and Disability Ethics Committees (Reference no: 18/NTA/137). Following ethical approval, adult hospital inpatients from two service divisions in one large urban hospital in New Zealand were invited to self-assess their medicines information needs using the 23-item MINI-Q via a tablet or on paper. Descriptive statistics were generated from the quantitative data and responses to a free-text question were inductively analysed.
Results
The MINI-Q was completed by 228 inpatients, 137 (60%) of whom used a tablet. Participants requested information on 80.6% of the possible topics. The most common topic that participants wanted information about was possible side effects (92%). No additional topics to include in the MINI-Q were identified from the free-text responses. The median completion time of the tablet version was 9.2 min (interquartile range 6.7–14.6).
Conclusion
The MINI-Q shows promise to efficiently identify an individual's medicines information needs in an inpatient setting. The findings reinforce that most people want to know all the basic information about their medicines, with side effects being particularly important.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.