Predicting shale mineralogical brittleness index from seismic and elastic property logs using interpretable deep learning

2区 工程技术 Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Jaewook Lee , David E. Lumley
{"title":"Predicting shale mineralogical brittleness index from seismic and elastic property logs using interpretable deep learning","authors":"Jaewook Lee ,&nbsp;David E. Lumley","doi":"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The mineralogical brittleness index<span><span><span> (MBI) of organic-rich shale formations is one of the key parameters to identify the optimal production well locations and optimize hydraulic fracturing. Since we as a community don't understand the exact physical relationship between the MBI and </span>seismic properties<span> from well logs, we have used traditional approaches like the log-based brittleness index (LBI) and the elastic brittleness index (EBI) to quantify the rock brittleness from </span></span>seismic data<span> and well logs. The LBI method is easy to use but is empirically derived from the porosity and sonic logs. On the other hand, the EBI method is dependent on the average values of Young's modulus and </span></span></span>Poisson's ratio<span><span> but is not physically meaningful in practice. Therefore, we develop a deep learning approach to obtain a more reliable MBI model from seismic properties and enhance the interpretability with Shapley values. First, we analyze the statistical relationship between the MBI and eight seismic properties from well logs and distinguish the influential input variables for the MBI prediction, such as bulk density, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio. Second, we find a multivariate linear regression (MLR) model with three input properties and quantify the relative statistical contribution of each input based on Shapley values. Third, we use a </span>deep neural network<span> technique to derive the nonlinear estimation model with a better fit to the MBI data than the traditional methods. We test and verify our approach on field log and core data from the Wolfcamp shales in the Permian Basin, Texas. In conclusion, this workflow can provide a more interpretable and accurate MBI estimation from seismic properties to enhance unconventional shale </span></span></span>reservoir characterization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 111231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092041052201083X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The mineralogical brittleness index (MBI) of organic-rich shale formations is one of the key parameters to identify the optimal production well locations and optimize hydraulic fracturing. Since we as a community don't understand the exact physical relationship between the MBI and seismic properties from well logs, we have used traditional approaches like the log-based brittleness index (LBI) and the elastic brittleness index (EBI) to quantify the rock brittleness from seismic data and well logs. The LBI method is easy to use but is empirically derived from the porosity and sonic logs. On the other hand, the EBI method is dependent on the average values of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio but is not physically meaningful in practice. Therefore, we develop a deep learning approach to obtain a more reliable MBI model from seismic properties and enhance the interpretability with Shapley values. First, we analyze the statistical relationship between the MBI and eight seismic properties from well logs and distinguish the influential input variables for the MBI prediction, such as bulk density, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio. Second, we find a multivariate linear regression (MLR) model with three input properties and quantify the relative statistical contribution of each input based on Shapley values. Third, we use a deep neural network technique to derive the nonlinear estimation model with a better fit to the MBI data than the traditional methods. We test and verify our approach on field log and core data from the Wolfcamp shales in the Permian Basin, Texas. In conclusion, this workflow can provide a more interpretable and accurate MBI estimation from seismic properties to enhance unconventional shale reservoir characterization.

利用可解释深度学习从地震和弹性属性测井预测页岩矿物学脆性指数
富有机质页岩储层的矿物学脆性指数(MBI)是确定最佳生产井位和优化水力压裂的关键参数之一。由于我们并不了解测井数据中MBI与地震性质之间的确切物理关系,因此我们使用了传统的方法,如基于测井的脆性指数(LBI)和弹性脆性指数(EBI),来量化地震数据和测井数据中的岩石脆性。LBI方法易于使用,但它是由孔隙度和声波测井经验得出的。另一方面,EBI方法依赖于杨氏模量和泊松比的平均值,在实际应用中没有物理意义。因此,我们开发了一种深度学习方法,从地震属性中获得更可靠的MBI模型,并提高了Shapley值的可解释性。首先,我们分析了MBI与测井数据中8种地震性质之间的统计关系,并区分了影响MBI预测的输入变量,如体积密度、杨氏模量和泊松比。其次,我们找到了一个具有三种输入属性的多元线性回归(MLR)模型,并基于Shapley值量化了每种输入的相对统计贡献。第三,利用深度神经网络技术推导出比传统方法更适合MBI数据的非线性估计模型。我们对德克萨斯州二叠纪盆地Wolfcamp页岩的现场测井和岩心数据进行了测试和验证。总之,该工作流程可以提供更具可解释性和准确性的地震性质MBI估计,以增强非常规页岩储层的表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1511
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering, the geology and the science of petroleum and natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of petroleum engineering, natural gas engineering and petroleum (natural gas) geology. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering covers the fields of petroleum (and natural gas) exploration, production and flow in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of petroleum and natural gas; petroleum geochemistry; reservoir engineering; reservoir simulation; rock mechanics; petrophysics; pore-level phenomena; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced oil and gas recovery; petroleum geology; compaction/diagenesis; petroleum economics; drilling and drilling fluids; thermodynamics and phase behavior; fluid mechanics; multi-phase flow in porous media; production engineering; formation evaluation; exploration methods; CO2 Sequestration in geological formations/sub-surface; management and development of unconventional resources such as heavy oil and bitumen, tight oil and liquid rich shales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信