How service users envision their engagement in processes of collaborative innovation: A Q-methodological study on user involvement in eHealth collaborations

IF 2.9 4区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Chesney Callens, K. Verhoest, E. Klijn, S. Nõmmik, V. Pina, Lena Brogaard
{"title":"How service users envision their engagement in processes of collaborative innovation: A Q-methodological study on user involvement in eHealth collaborations","authors":"Chesney Callens, K. Verhoest, E. Klijn, S. Nõmmik, V. Pina, Lena Brogaard","doi":"10.1177/09520767231170298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Involving users in innovating public services is an increasingly common, but challenging practice, as users often have different viewpoints on their own role in the process. Particularly in complex innovation arrangements such as public-private collaborations, governments and service innovators need to be aware of users’ perceptions of their involvement to maximally exploit the advantages of including them. This article theorizes and tests four different roles of user-provider interaction on co-innovation processes: users as (1) legitimators, (2) customers, (3) partners, and (4) self-organizers. These theoretical roles are tested through Q-methodology on service users in 19 public-private eHealth collaborations from five European countries. Our findings suggest the existence of three hybrid empirical profiles of user involvement: (1) users as ‘service consultants’, (2) users as ‘co-designers’, and (3) users as ‘hands-off supporters’. The discovery of these profiles suggests the existence of different viewpoints on user involvement, which can influence the expectations and behavior of the users in innovation processes.","PeriodicalId":47076,"journal":{"name":"Public Policy and Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Policy and Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231170298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Involving users in innovating public services is an increasingly common, but challenging practice, as users often have different viewpoints on their own role in the process. Particularly in complex innovation arrangements such as public-private collaborations, governments and service innovators need to be aware of users’ perceptions of their involvement to maximally exploit the advantages of including them. This article theorizes and tests four different roles of user-provider interaction on co-innovation processes: users as (1) legitimators, (2) customers, (3) partners, and (4) self-organizers. These theoretical roles are tested through Q-methodology on service users in 19 public-private eHealth collaborations from five European countries. Our findings suggest the existence of three hybrid empirical profiles of user involvement: (1) users as ‘service consultants’, (2) users as ‘co-designers’, and (3) users as ‘hands-off supporters’. The discovery of these profiles suggests the existence of different viewpoints on user involvement, which can influence the expectations and behavior of the users in innovation processes.
服务用户如何设想他们参与合作创新过程:用户参与电子健康合作的Q方法研究
让用户参与公共服务创新是一种越来越常见但具有挑战性的做法,因为用户对自己在这一过程中的角色往往有不同的看法。特别是在公私合作等复杂的创新安排中,政府和服务创新者需要意识到用户对其参与的看法,以最大限度地利用包括他们在内的优势。本文对用户-提供者互动在共同创新过程中的四种不同作用进行了理论化和测试:用户是(1)合法化者,(2)客户,(3)合作伙伴,以及(4)自我组织者。这些理论作用通过Q方法在来自五个欧洲国家的19个公私电子健康合作的服务用户身上进行了测试。我们的研究结果表明,存在三种用户参与的混合经验特征:(1)用户是“服务顾问”,(2)用户是”联合设计者“,(3)用户是'放手的支持者'。这些档案的发现表明,在用户参与方面存在不同的观点,这些观点会影响用户在创新过程中的期望和行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Policy and Administration
Public Policy and Administration PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Policy and Administration is the journal of the UK Joint University Council (JUC) Public Administration Committee (PAC). The journal aims to publish original peer-reviewed material within the broad field of public policy and administration. This includes recent developments in research, scholarship and practice within public policy, public administration, government, public management, administrative theory, administrative history, and administrative politics. The journal seeks to foster a pluralistic approach to the study of public policy and administration. International in readership, Public Policy and Administration welcomes submissions for anywhere in the world, from both academic and practitioner communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信