Reflections on the coproduction of a crisis-focused intervention for inpatient settings underpinned by a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) model

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
L. Wood, Arthur J. Rowe, K. Persaud, P. Nyikavaranda, Nira Malde-Shah, E. Guerin, C. Dare, Callam Constant, M. Birken
{"title":"Reflections on the coproduction of a crisis-focused intervention for inpatient settings underpinned by a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) model","authors":"L. Wood, Arthur J. Rowe, K. Persaud, P. Nyikavaranda, Nira Malde-Shah, E. Guerin, C. Dare, Callam Constant, M. Birken","doi":"10.1080/17522439.2023.2220373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Psychological interventions delivered in inpatient settings have rarely been coproduced with those who receive them. The aim of this study is to outline the coproduction process which led to the development of an adapted inpatient intervention underpinned by a Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for psychosis model. Method: Our coproduction group was comprised of experts by experience, family and carers, multi-disciplinary clinicians, and researchers. The group met monthly to develop the intervention and focused on eight key areas of the intervention, including therapist values, assessment, formulation, coping strategies, crisis/safety plans, and discharge plans. Results: The coproduction panel highlighted the importance of flexible delivery of the intervention, developing a trusting relationship with the therapist, advocacy, prioritising patient safety on the ward, managing the impacts of inpatient care, preparing for discharge, and having family, carer and community involvement. Challenges of the coproduction process included having a pre-existing intervention model that was being adapted rather than coproducing a new one, discussing emotionally charged issues, and having limited time to coproduce the intervention. Discussion: Coproduction brought immense value to the development of this intervention, ensuring it was culturally competent and suitable for the inpatient setting. Further research should be undertaken exploring the coproduction process applied to clinical research.","PeriodicalId":46344,"journal":{"name":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2023.2220373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychological interventions delivered in inpatient settings have rarely been coproduced with those who receive them. The aim of this study is to outline the coproduction process which led to the development of an adapted inpatient intervention underpinned by a Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for psychosis model. Method: Our coproduction group was comprised of experts by experience, family and carers, multi-disciplinary clinicians, and researchers. The group met monthly to develop the intervention and focused on eight key areas of the intervention, including therapist values, assessment, formulation, coping strategies, crisis/safety plans, and discharge plans. Results: The coproduction panel highlighted the importance of flexible delivery of the intervention, developing a trusting relationship with the therapist, advocacy, prioritising patient safety on the ward, managing the impacts of inpatient care, preparing for discharge, and having family, carer and community involvement. Challenges of the coproduction process included having a pre-existing intervention model that was being adapted rather than coproducing a new one, discussing emotionally charged issues, and having limited time to coproduce the intervention. Discussion: Coproduction brought immense value to the development of this intervention, ensuring it was culturally competent and suitable for the inpatient setting. Further research should be undertaken exploring the coproduction process applied to clinical research.
在精神病认知行为疗法(CBTp)模型的基础上,对住院病人环境的危机干预的反思
背景:在住院环境中提供的心理干预很少与接受干预的人共同进行。本研究的目的是概述共同生产过程,该过程导致了以精神病认知行为疗法模型为基础的适应性住院干预的发展。方法:我们的合作小组由经验丰富的专家、家庭和护理人员、多学科临床医生和研究人员组成。该小组每月开会制定干预措施,重点关注干预措施的八个关键领域,包括治疗师价值观、评估、制定、应对策略、危机/安全计划和出院计划。结果:联合制作小组强调了灵活提供干预、与治疗师建立信任关系、倡导、优先考虑病房患者安全、管理住院护理的影响、为出院做准备以及让家人、护理人员和社区参与的重要性。共同制作过程的挑战包括,有一个预先存在的干预模式正在进行调整,而不是共同制作一个新的干预模式,讨论情绪激动的问题,以及共同制作干预的时间有限。讨论:共同生产为这种干预措施的发展带来了巨大的价值,确保了它在文化上是合格的,适合住院环境。应该进行进一步的研究,探索应用于临床研究的合作生产过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信