Enabling Transformative Research: Lessons from the Eastern and Southern Africa Partnership Programme (1999-2015)

IF 0.8 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
C. Ott
{"title":"Enabling Transformative Research: Lessons from the Eastern and Southern Africa Partnership Programme (1999-2015)","authors":"C. Ott","doi":"10.12924/CIS2017.05010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"World leaders at the 2015 United Nations Sustainable Development Summit in New York have re- confirmed the relevance of sustainability as the guiding paradigm in countering the development and climate crisis of the Anthropocene. Recent decades however, have been characterized by confusion, contestations, and arbitrariness in defining the nature and pathways of sustainable development. Humanity must urgently find ways to unlock the potential of the sustainability paradigm and organize a sustainability transforma- tion. An emerging sustainability science community has already established considerable consensus on essential features of transformative science and research. Sustainability scholars are providing growing evidence that an emancipatory and democratic construction of sustainable development and more equitable, deliberative, and democratized knowledge generation are pivotal in tackling sustainability challenges. These findings are further underpinned by experiences gained in the Eastern and Southern Africa Partnership Programme (1999–2015)—a rare case of a long-term, transnational, and transdisciplinary research en- deavour already completed. The programme fulfilled the dual role which is compulsory in transformative research: It generated contextualized knowledge and innovation at the science–society interface while simultaneously securing meaningful participation and Southern agency in a co-evolutionary process. This paper offers insight into the programme’s adaptive structure and implementation processes, which fostered deliberation, capacity development, and joint programme navigation benchmarked against local needs and broader sustainability demands. The ESAPP experience confirms that, if taken as the overarching frame of reference for all actors involved, the sustainability paradigm unfolds its integrative and transformative power. It enables sustainability-oriented actors from all scientific and practical fields to seek consilience between differing development and innovation paradigms and synchronize their development agendas and research frameworks on behalf of societal co-production of knowledge and innovation. Accordingly, the sustainability paradigm has the power to guide development and innovation policy, and practice out of the current confusion and ineffectiveness.","PeriodicalId":9944,"journal":{"name":"Challenges in Sustainability","volume":"5 1","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenges in Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/CIS2017.05010015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

World leaders at the 2015 United Nations Sustainable Development Summit in New York have re- confirmed the relevance of sustainability as the guiding paradigm in countering the development and climate crisis of the Anthropocene. Recent decades however, have been characterized by confusion, contestations, and arbitrariness in defining the nature and pathways of sustainable development. Humanity must urgently find ways to unlock the potential of the sustainability paradigm and organize a sustainability transforma- tion. An emerging sustainability science community has already established considerable consensus on essential features of transformative science and research. Sustainability scholars are providing growing evidence that an emancipatory and democratic construction of sustainable development and more equitable, deliberative, and democratized knowledge generation are pivotal in tackling sustainability challenges. These findings are further underpinned by experiences gained in the Eastern and Southern Africa Partnership Programme (1999–2015)—a rare case of a long-term, transnational, and transdisciplinary research en- deavour already completed. The programme fulfilled the dual role which is compulsory in transformative research: It generated contextualized knowledge and innovation at the science–society interface while simultaneously securing meaningful participation and Southern agency in a co-evolutionary process. This paper offers insight into the programme’s adaptive structure and implementation processes, which fostered deliberation, capacity development, and joint programme navigation benchmarked against local needs and broader sustainability demands. The ESAPP experience confirms that, if taken as the overarching frame of reference for all actors involved, the sustainability paradigm unfolds its integrative and transformative power. It enables sustainability-oriented actors from all scientific and practical fields to seek consilience between differing development and innovation paradigms and synchronize their development agendas and research frameworks on behalf of societal co-production of knowledge and innovation. Accordingly, the sustainability paradigm has the power to guide development and innovation policy, and practice out of the current confusion and ineffectiveness.
促进变革性研究:东部和南部非洲伙伴关系方案的经验教训(1999-2015)
2015年在纽约举行的联合国可持续发展峰会上,世界各国领导人重申了可持续发展作为应对人类世发展和气候危机的指导范式的重要性。然而,近几十年来,在界定可持续发展的性质和途径方面出现了混乱、争论和武断的特点。人类必须尽快找到方法来释放可持续性范式的潜力,并组织可持续性转型。一个新兴的可持续性科学界已经就变革性科学和研究的基本特征建立了相当大的共识。可持续发展学者提供了越来越多的证据,表明可持续发展的解放和民主建设以及更公平、协商和民主化的知识产生是解决可持续发展挑战的关键。东部和南部非洲伙伴计划(1999-2015)的经验进一步支持了这些发现,这是一个罕见的长期、跨国和跨学科研究的案例,已经完成了努力。该方案履行了在变革性研究中必须发挥的双重作用:它在科学-社会界面产生了背景知识和创新,同时确保在共同进化过程中有意义的参与和南方机构。本文提供了对项目适应性结构和实施过程的洞察,这些过程促进了审议、能力发展和联合项目导航,以当地需求和更广泛的可持续性需求为基准。ESAPP的经验证实,如果将可持续性范式作为所有相关参与者的总体参考框架,则可持续性范式展现出其综合和变革的力量。它使来自所有科学和实践领域的以可持续为导向的行动者能够在不同的发展和创新范式之间寻求一致性,并代表知识和创新的社会共同生产同步其发展议程和研究框架。因此,可持续发展范式具有指导发展和创新政策的力量,并能使实践走出当前的混乱和低效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Challenges in Sustainability
Challenges in Sustainability GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信