Sarah Harrison , Alexandra Macmillan , Sophie Bond , Janet Stephenson
{"title":"Participatory modeling for local and regional collaboration on climate change adaptation and health","authors":"Sarah Harrison , Alexandra Macmillan , Sophie Bond , Janet Stephenson","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Climate change-related flooding and sea-level rise have important direct and indirect health effects. In order to support health and equity, adaptation responses require collaborative, transdisciplinary learning and consensus-building, across a wide range of local-level stakeholders. We aimed to co-develop a shared understanding of the complex interplay between health, health determinants, flooding, and sea-level rise in a low-income urban area of Aotearoa New Zealand, to inform action.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used qualitative participatory system dynamics modeling, involving interviews and group workshops with transdisciplinary stakeholders. We developed a shared set of wellbeing outcomes and triangulated participants’ knowledge with published evidence to develop a set of causal loop diagrams (CLDs). These capture the system feedback behavior between flooding and sea-level rise, and local health and wellbeing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-three participants were involved across the project, identifying 22 wellbeing outcomes. The CLDs covered six intersecting themes: community-led development and participation in decision-making; quality of housing; the housing market; the insurance market; economic effects of flooding and sea-level rise; and access issues arising from flooding. Intervention points were identified, with the potential to inform health equity-focused adaptation policy. The process supported shifts in participants’ mental models towards consensus and effective intervention points, and transdisciplinary relationship-building.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Participatory systems modeling approaches may support cross-sector collaborative learning about the complex, dynamic influences on health and wellbeing in the context of local climate change adaptation. These shared, holistic understandings are essential to inform decision-making that promotes positive health and social equity outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278223000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction
Climate change-related flooding and sea-level rise have important direct and indirect health effects. In order to support health and equity, adaptation responses require collaborative, transdisciplinary learning and consensus-building, across a wide range of local-level stakeholders. We aimed to co-develop a shared understanding of the complex interplay between health, health determinants, flooding, and sea-level rise in a low-income urban area of Aotearoa New Zealand, to inform action.
Methods
We used qualitative participatory system dynamics modeling, involving interviews and group workshops with transdisciplinary stakeholders. We developed a shared set of wellbeing outcomes and triangulated participants’ knowledge with published evidence to develop a set of causal loop diagrams (CLDs). These capture the system feedback behavior between flooding and sea-level rise, and local health and wellbeing.
Results
Thirty-three participants were involved across the project, identifying 22 wellbeing outcomes. The CLDs covered six intersecting themes: community-led development and participation in decision-making; quality of housing; the housing market; the insurance market; economic effects of flooding and sea-level rise; and access issues arising from flooding. Intervention points were identified, with the potential to inform health equity-focused adaptation policy. The process supported shifts in participants’ mental models towards consensus and effective intervention points, and transdisciplinary relationship-building.
Conclusion
Participatory systems modeling approaches may support cross-sector collaborative learning about the complex, dynamic influences on health and wellbeing in the context of local climate change adaptation. These shared, holistic understandings are essential to inform decision-making that promotes positive health and social equity outcomes.