Towards a trajectory for sustainable policies and market strategies governing building lifecycle energy performance

IF 3.5 Q3 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Benonia Tinarwo, F. Rahimian, Dana Abi Ghanem
{"title":"Towards a trajectory for sustainable policies and market strategies governing building lifecycle energy performance","authors":"Benonia Tinarwo, F. Rahimian, Dana Abi Ghanem","doi":"10.1108/sasbe-01-2023-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe aim of this paper is to discuss a selection of policy strategies, regional initiatives and market approaches to uncover the realities of twenty-first-century building energy performance. A position that market-based approaches, human influence and policy interventions are part of an ecosystem of building energy performance is presented.Design/methodology/approachAn exploratory search of secondary sources spanning the last three decades was conducted. Both peer-reviewed and grey literature were included to capture a broader understanding of the discourse in literature. Research questions guided the literature search, and a data extraction tool was designed to categorise the literature. The primary limitation of this study is that only a few applications could be discussed in a condensed format.FindingsSeveral challenges about the current status quo of building energy performance were identified and summarised as follows. (1) Inconsistencies in measurement and verification protocols, (2) Impacts of market approaches, (3) National policy priorities that are at variance with regional targets and (4) Ambiguous reporting on environmental impacts of energy efficiency (EE) technologies.Practical implicationsThe practical implications of the findings in this paper for practice and research are that as part of the building energy performance ecosystem, national responses through government interventions must become adaptive to keep up with the fast-paced energy sector and social trends. Simultaneously, before market-based approaches overcome the messiness of socio-economic dynamics, institutional conditions and cultural nuances, they ought to transparently address environmental impacts and the infringement of several SDGs before they can become viable solutions to building energy performance.Originality/valueThis paper presents building energy performance as an ecosystem comprising human influence, market-based approaches and policy interventions which form interdependent parts of the whole. However, evidence in the literature shows that these aspects are usually investigated separately. By presenting them as an ecosystem, this paper contributes to the discourse by advocating the need to re-align building energy performance to socio-economic-political dynamics and contextually viable solutions.","PeriodicalId":45779,"journal":{"name":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-01-2023-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to discuss a selection of policy strategies, regional initiatives and market approaches to uncover the realities of twenty-first-century building energy performance. A position that market-based approaches, human influence and policy interventions are part of an ecosystem of building energy performance is presented.Design/methodology/approachAn exploratory search of secondary sources spanning the last three decades was conducted. Both peer-reviewed and grey literature were included to capture a broader understanding of the discourse in literature. Research questions guided the literature search, and a data extraction tool was designed to categorise the literature. The primary limitation of this study is that only a few applications could be discussed in a condensed format.FindingsSeveral challenges about the current status quo of building energy performance were identified and summarised as follows. (1) Inconsistencies in measurement and verification protocols, (2) Impacts of market approaches, (3) National policy priorities that are at variance with regional targets and (4) Ambiguous reporting on environmental impacts of energy efficiency (EE) technologies.Practical implicationsThe practical implications of the findings in this paper for practice and research are that as part of the building energy performance ecosystem, national responses through government interventions must become adaptive to keep up with the fast-paced energy sector and social trends. Simultaneously, before market-based approaches overcome the messiness of socio-economic dynamics, institutional conditions and cultural nuances, they ought to transparently address environmental impacts and the infringement of several SDGs before they can become viable solutions to building energy performance.Originality/valueThis paper presents building energy performance as an ecosystem comprising human influence, market-based approaches and policy interventions which form interdependent parts of the whole. However, evidence in the literature shows that these aspects are usually investigated separately. By presenting them as an ecosystem, this paper contributes to the discourse by advocating the need to re-align building energy performance to socio-economic-political dynamics and contextually viable solutions.
迈向管理建筑生命周期能源性能的可持续政策和市场战略的发展轨迹
目的本文的目的是讨论一系列政策策略、区域举措和市场方法,以揭示21世纪建筑能源绩效的现实。提出了一种立场,即基于市场的方法、人类影响和政策干预是建筑能源绩效生态系统的一部分。设计/方法论/方法对过去三十年的次要来源进行了探索性搜索。同行评审和灰色文学都被纳入其中,以获得对文学话语的更广泛理解。研究问题指导了文献检索,并设计了一个数据提取工具来对文献进行分类。这项研究的主要局限性是,只有少数应用程序可以以浓缩的格式进行讨论。发现关于建筑能源性能现状的几个挑战被确定并总结如下。(1) 测量和验证协议不一致,(2)市场方法的影响,(3)与区域目标不一致的国家政策优先事项,以及(4)能源效率技术对环境影响的报告不明确。实际意义本文研究结果对实践和研究的实际意义是,作为建设能源绩效生态系统的一部分,国家通过政府干预的应对措施必须具有适应性,以跟上快节奏的能源部门和社会趋势。同时,在基于市场的方法克服社会经济动态、制度条件和文化细微差别的混乱之前,它们应该透明地解决环境影响和对几个可持续发展目标的侵犯,然后才能成为建设能源绩效的可行解决方案。独创性/价值本文将建筑能源绩效视为一个生态系统,包括人类影响、基于市场的方法和政策干预,这些因素构成了整体中相互依存的部分。然而,文献中的证据表明,这些方面通常是单独调查的。通过将其作为一个生态系统来呈现,本文主张有必要将建筑能源绩效与社会经济政治动态和情境可行的解决方案重新调整,从而为讨论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信