Hyper-elite network building in Madagascar: amplification or compensatory strategy?

IF 3.2 2区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Socio-Economic Review Pub Date : 2022-08-12 DOI:10.1093/ser/mwac045

Linda Rua, M. Razafindrakoto, F. Roubaud

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has proved that social networks are unevenly distributed. Qualitative and theoretical work on elite networks raises the question: do they amplify or compensate for inequalities in the powerful other resources? We test these hypotheses using a unique dataset of hyper-elites in Madagascar. We identify three network dimensions: extent, quality and effectiveness. We find that elite groups disadvantaged in terms of social position are generally disadvantaged in terms of social networks. In particular, the caste system is still key to network building at the top. Homophily is the dominant bonding dynamic among elites. However, some compensatory mechanisms are in play. Socially disadvantaged elites tend to make more use of their networks. They also have more upwardly heterophilous potential and mobilized networks. The predominance of the elite network’s amplifying role explains the prevalence of the elite reproduction dynamic. Newcomers, who represent a minority, are excluded from the highest decision-making bodies.

查看原文本刊更多论文

马达加斯加的超级精英网络建设:放大还是补偿策略?

研究证明，社交网络分布不均。关于精英网络的定性和理论研究提出了一个问题：它们是放大还是补偿了强大的其他资源中的不平等？我们使用马达加斯加超级精英的独特数据集来检验这些假设。我们确定了三个网络维度：范围、质量和有效性。我们发现，在社会地位方面处于不利地位的精英群体在社会网络方面通常处于不利地位。特别是，种姓制度仍然是高层网络建设的关键。同性恋是精英之间的主要纽带。然而，一些补偿机制正在发挥作用。处于社会弱势的精英倾向于更多地利用他们的网络。他们也有更多向上的异语文潜力和动员网络。精英网络放大作用的优势解释了精英再生产动态的普遍性。代表少数群体的新来者被排除在最高决策机构之外。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Socio-Economic Review Multiple-

CiteScore

6.80

自引率

10.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Originating in the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE), Socio-Economic Review (SER) is part of a broader movement in the social sciences for the rediscovery of the socio-political foundations of the economy. Devoted to the advancement of socio-economics, it deals with the analytical, political and moral questions arising at the intersection between economy and society. Articles in SER explore how the economy is or should be governed by social relations, institutional rules, political decisions, and cultural values. They also consider how the economy in turn affects the society of which it is part, for example by breaking up old institutional forms and giving rise to new ones. The domain of the journal is deliberately broadly conceived, so new variations to its general theme may be discovered and editors can learn from the papers that readers submit. To enhance international dialogue, Socio-Economic Review accepts the submission of translated articles that are simultaneously published in a language other than English. In pursuit of its program, SER is eager to promote interdisciplinary dialogue between sociology, economics, political science and moral philosophy, through both empirical and theoretical work. Empirical papers may be qualitative as well as quantitative, and theoretical papers will not be confined to deductive model-building. Papers suggestive of more generalizable insights into the economy as a domain of social action will be preferred over narrowly specialized work. While firmly committed to the highest standards of scholarly excellence, Socio-Economic Review encourages discussion of the practical and ethical dimensions of economic action, with the intention to contribute to both the advancement of social science and the building of a good economy in a good society.