In Loco Parentis and the Politically-directed Music Curriculum

IF 0.7 0 MUSIC
William M. Perrine
{"title":"In Loco Parentis and the Politically-directed Music Curriculum","authors":"William M. Perrine","doi":"10.2979/philmusieducrevi.27.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The pedagogical aim of liberation, as drawn from critical pedagogy, poses significant philosophical problems. In this paper, I argue that the fundamental right to direct the education of children rests with the family situated within a particular local community. This authority is then delegated to the state through the institution of the school via a social contract that can be described as in loco parentis. Advocating liberation as a universally appropriate educational good encourages teachers to violate this social contract by seeking to free children from family and community attachments deemed to be repressive within the context of a particular form of moral reasoning. Music educators utilizing the language of critical pedagogy thus adopt the framework of a contestable philosophical tradition that in turns instrumentalizes the music curriculum, subordinating the study or creation of music to external social goals. Instead, I argue that seeking to liberate children engenders political proselytization due to its imperative in converting children from one philosophical tradition to another. I conclude that directed efforts towards liberation should be avoided in the music classroom, that parents have a right to resist efforts to liberate their children, and that music education should prioritize artistic over political ends.","PeriodicalId":43479,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"171 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/philmusieducrevi.27.2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:The pedagogical aim of liberation, as drawn from critical pedagogy, poses significant philosophical problems. In this paper, I argue that the fundamental right to direct the education of children rests with the family situated within a particular local community. This authority is then delegated to the state through the institution of the school via a social contract that can be described as in loco parentis. Advocating liberation as a universally appropriate educational good encourages teachers to violate this social contract by seeking to free children from family and community attachments deemed to be repressive within the context of a particular form of moral reasoning. Music educators utilizing the language of critical pedagogy thus adopt the framework of a contestable philosophical tradition that in turns instrumentalizes the music curriculum, subordinating the study or creation of music to external social goals. Instead, I argue that seeking to liberate children engenders political proselytization due to its imperative in converting children from one philosophical tradition to another. I conclude that directed efforts towards liberation should be avoided in the music classroom, that parents have a right to resist efforts to liberate their children, and that music education should prioritize artistic over political ends.
代替家长和政治导向的音乐课程
摘要:批判教育学提出的“解放”的教学目标提出了重大的哲学问题。在本文中,我认为指导儿童教育的基本权利属于位于特定地方社区内的家庭。然后,这种权力通过学校的机构,通过一种可以被描述为代替父母的社会契约,下放给国家。提倡将解放作为一种普遍适用的教育成果,鼓励教师通过寻求将儿童从某种特定形式的道德推理背景下被视为压抑的家庭和社区依恋中解放出来,从而违反这种社会契约。因此,音乐教育家利用批判教学法的语言,采用了一种有争议的哲学传统的框架,这种哲学传统反过来使音乐课程工具化,使音乐的研究或创作服从于外部社会目标。相反,我认为寻求解放儿童会导致政治皈依,因为它必须将儿童从一种哲学传统转变为另一种哲学传统。我的结论是,在音乐课堂上应该避免直接的解放努力,父母有权利抵制解放孩子的努力,音乐教育应该优先考虑艺术目的而不是政治目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信