Comparing the influence of mixed reality, a 3D viewer, and MRI on the spatial understanding of brain tumours

IF 3.2 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
T. Fick, J. Meulstee, M. Köllen, J. V. van Doormaal, T. V. van Doormaal, E. Hoving
{"title":"Comparing the influence of mixed reality, a 3D viewer, and MRI on the spatial understanding of brain tumours","authors":"T. Fick, J. Meulstee, M. Köllen, J. V. van Doormaal, T. V. van Doormaal, E. Hoving","doi":"10.3389/frvir.2023.1214520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multiple 3D visualization techniques are available that obviates the need for the surgeon to mentally transform the 2D planes from MRI to the 3D anatomy of the patient. We assessed the spatial understanding of a brain tumour when visualized with MRI, 3D models on a monitor or 3D models in mixed reality.Methods: Medical students, neurosurgical residents and neurosurgeons were divided into three groups based on the imaging modality used for preparation: MRI, 3D viewer and mixed reality. After preparation, the participants needed to position, scale, and rotate a virtual tumour inside a virtual head of the patient in the same orientation as the original tumour would be. Primary outcome was the amount of overlap between the placed tumour and the original tumour to evaluate accuracy. Secondary outcomes were the position, volume and rotation deviation compared to the original tumour.Results: A total of 12 medical students, 12 neurosurgical residents, and 12 neurosurgeons were included. For medical students, the mean amount of overlap for the MRI, 3D viewer and mixed reality group was 0.26 (0.22), 0.38 (0.20) and 0.48 (0.20) respectively. For residents 0.45 (0.23), 0.45 (0.19) and 0.68 (0.11) and for neurosurgeons 0.39 (0.20), 0.50 (0.27) and 0.67 (0.14). The amount of overlap for mixed reality was significantly higher on all expertise levels compared to MRI and on resident and neurosurgeon level also compared to the 3D viewer. Furthermore, mixed reality showed the lowest deviations in position, volume and rotation on all expertise levels.Conclusion: Mixed reality enhances the spatial understanding of brain tumours compared to MRI and 3D models on a monitor. The preoperative use of mixed reality may therefore support the surgeon to improve spatial 3D related surgical tasks such as patient positioning and planning surgical trajectories.","PeriodicalId":73116,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in virtual reality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in virtual reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1214520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Multiple 3D visualization techniques are available that obviates the need for the surgeon to mentally transform the 2D planes from MRI to the 3D anatomy of the patient. We assessed the spatial understanding of a brain tumour when visualized with MRI, 3D models on a monitor or 3D models in mixed reality.Methods: Medical students, neurosurgical residents and neurosurgeons were divided into three groups based on the imaging modality used for preparation: MRI, 3D viewer and mixed reality. After preparation, the participants needed to position, scale, and rotate a virtual tumour inside a virtual head of the patient in the same orientation as the original tumour would be. Primary outcome was the amount of overlap between the placed tumour and the original tumour to evaluate accuracy. Secondary outcomes were the position, volume and rotation deviation compared to the original tumour.Results: A total of 12 medical students, 12 neurosurgical residents, and 12 neurosurgeons were included. For medical students, the mean amount of overlap for the MRI, 3D viewer and mixed reality group was 0.26 (0.22), 0.38 (0.20) and 0.48 (0.20) respectively. For residents 0.45 (0.23), 0.45 (0.19) and 0.68 (0.11) and for neurosurgeons 0.39 (0.20), 0.50 (0.27) and 0.67 (0.14). The amount of overlap for mixed reality was significantly higher on all expertise levels compared to MRI and on resident and neurosurgeon level also compared to the 3D viewer. Furthermore, mixed reality showed the lowest deviations in position, volume and rotation on all expertise levels.Conclusion: Mixed reality enhances the spatial understanding of brain tumours compared to MRI and 3D models on a monitor. The preoperative use of mixed reality may therefore support the surgeon to improve spatial 3D related surgical tasks such as patient positioning and planning surgical trajectories.
比较混合现实、3D查看器和MRI对脑肿瘤空间理解的影响
背景:多种3D可视化技术可用,无需外科医生在心理上将2D平面从MRI转换为患者的3D解剖结构。当用MRI、监视器上的3D模型或混合现实中的3D模型进行可视化时,我们评估了对脑瘤的空间理解。方法:根据用于准备的成像方式,将医学生、神经外科住院医师和神经外科医生分为三组:MRI、3D查看器和混合现实。准备好后,参与者需要在患者的虚拟头部内以与原始肿瘤相同的方向定位、缩放和旋转虚拟肿瘤。主要结果是放置的肿瘤和原始肿瘤之间的重叠量,以评估准确性。次要结果是与原始肿瘤相比的位置、体积和旋转偏差。结果:共纳入12名医学生、12名神经外科住院医师和12名神经外科医生。对于医学生,MRI、3D查看器和混合现实组的平均重叠量分别为0.26(0.22)、0.38(0.20)和0.48(0.20)。住院医师0.45(0.23)、0.45(0.19)和0.68(0.11),神经外科医生0.39(0.20)、0.50(0.27)和0.67(0.14)。与MRI相比,混合现实在所有专业水平上的重叠量明显更高,住院医师和神经外科医生水平上也与3D查看器相比。此外,混合现实显示,在所有专业知识层面上,职位、数量和轮换的偏差最小。结论:与监视器上的MRI和3D模型相比,混合现实增强了对脑肿瘤的空间理解。因此,混合现实的术前使用可以支持外科医生改进空间3D相关的手术任务,例如患者定位和规划手术轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信