Left Feminisms: Conversations on the personal and political

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Rachel Collett
{"title":"Left Feminisms: Conversations on the personal and political","authors":"Rachel Collett","doi":"10.1080/09612025.2023.2239656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"permit the use of the contraceptive pill and deemed artificial birth control as ‘intrinsically evil’. There was a growing defiance, which Kelly covers ably, to both government and Church restrictions on contraception. The Irish Women’s Liberation Movement played a significant role in this campaign, and Family Planning clinics began to appear around the country between 1969 and 1978. New legislation was introduced, and the 1979 Family Plannning Act attempted to ensure that even non-medical contraceptives were available only to married couples. In relation to access to contraceptives one female activist observed ‘you would think they are explosives the way they are treated’ (p. 299). The Customs service sometimes turned a blind eye to the importation of contraceptives. One activist was stopped at a border checkpoint returning from the North of Ireland where he had collected forty thousand condoms then held in the boot of his car. When questioned about them he replied, ‘They are for my own personal use’ and he was told by the police to ‘Have a nice weekend’ (p. 206). For all the activism and campaigns there was also a considerable and well-organised opposition to these liberal developments. The Irish Family League, a group of Catholic campaigners, was one of the most prominent organisations to campaign against contraception. It was only in 1985 that a prescription was no longer needed to acquire condoms but even in the 1980s and 1990s, class, where you lived, the presence in a town of sympathetic doctors or chemists shaped access to contraception. By the mid-1990s contraception was fully liberalised by the law. Kelly provides us with a fascinating account of people’s private sexual lives, and reveals how complex the relationships were among married couples around contraceptive practices. It reveals how many negotiated their religious beliefs with their desires to rationalise the number of children they had. There was moral complexity among citizens of the State regarding the legislation that shaped access to contraceptives and further complexity about how individuals and couples reconciled their beliefs with the dictates of the Catholic church. Kelly has engaged in extensive research in church archives, court records and the records of campaigning organisations. The oral histories illuminate all of this research material and infuse it with humanity. This is a very fine and necessary study.","PeriodicalId":46582,"journal":{"name":"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW","volume":"32 1","pages":"920 - 922"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2023.2239656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

permit the use of the contraceptive pill and deemed artificial birth control as ‘intrinsically evil’. There was a growing defiance, which Kelly covers ably, to both government and Church restrictions on contraception. The Irish Women’s Liberation Movement played a significant role in this campaign, and Family Planning clinics began to appear around the country between 1969 and 1978. New legislation was introduced, and the 1979 Family Plannning Act attempted to ensure that even non-medical contraceptives were available only to married couples. In relation to access to contraceptives one female activist observed ‘you would think they are explosives the way they are treated’ (p. 299). The Customs service sometimes turned a blind eye to the importation of contraceptives. One activist was stopped at a border checkpoint returning from the North of Ireland where he had collected forty thousand condoms then held in the boot of his car. When questioned about them he replied, ‘They are for my own personal use’ and he was told by the police to ‘Have a nice weekend’ (p. 206). For all the activism and campaigns there was also a considerable and well-organised opposition to these liberal developments. The Irish Family League, a group of Catholic campaigners, was one of the most prominent organisations to campaign against contraception. It was only in 1985 that a prescription was no longer needed to acquire condoms but even in the 1980s and 1990s, class, where you lived, the presence in a town of sympathetic doctors or chemists shaped access to contraception. By the mid-1990s contraception was fully liberalised by the law. Kelly provides us with a fascinating account of people’s private sexual lives, and reveals how complex the relationships were among married couples around contraceptive practices. It reveals how many negotiated their religious beliefs with their desires to rationalise the number of children they had. There was moral complexity among citizens of the State regarding the legislation that shaped access to contraceptives and further complexity about how individuals and couples reconciled their beliefs with the dictates of the Catholic church. Kelly has engaged in extensive research in church archives, court records and the records of campaigning organisations. The oral histories illuminate all of this research material and infuse it with humanity. This is a very fine and necessary study.
左派女权主义:关于个人和政治的对话
允许使用避孕药,并认为人工节育“本质上是邪恶的”。凯利巧妙地掩盖了人们对政府和教会避孕限制的反抗。爱尔兰妇女解放运动在这场运动中发挥了重要作用,1969年至1978年间,计划生育诊所开始在全国各地出现。出台了新的立法,1979年的《计划生育法》试图确保即使是非医疗避孕药具也只能提供给已婚夫妇。关于获得避孕药具的问题,一位女性活动家观察到,“你会认为她们受到的待遇是爆炸物”(第299页)。海关有时对进口避孕药具视而不见。一名活动人士在从北爱尔兰返回的边境检查站被拦下,他在那里收集了四万个避孕套,然后放在汽车后备箱里。当被问及它们时,他回答说,“它们是我个人使用的”,警察告诉他“周末愉快”(第206页)。对于所有的激进主义和运动,也有相当多的、组织良好的反对这些自由主义的发展。爱尔兰家庭联盟是一个由天主教活动家组成的团体,是反对避孕运动最著名的组织之一。直到1985年,购买避孕套才不再需要处方,但即使在20世纪80年代和90年代,阶级、你居住的地方,在一个富有同情心的医生或化学家的小镇上的存在,也影响了避孕的机会。到20世纪90年代中期,法律完全放开了避孕。Kelly为我们提供了一个关于人们私人性生活的引人入胜的描述,并揭示了已婚夫妇之间围绕避孕措施的关系是多么复杂。它揭示了有多少人通过协商他们的宗教信仰来合理化他们的孩子数量。国家公民在制定获得避孕药具的立法方面存在道德复杂性,个人和夫妇如何将自己的信仰与天主教会的指示相调和的问题也更加复杂。凯利对教堂档案、法庭记录和竞选组织的记录进行了广泛的研究。口述历史阐明了所有这些研究材料,并为其注入了人性。这是一项非常精细和必要的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Women"s History Review is a major international journal whose aim is to provide a forum for the publication of new scholarly articles in the field of womens" history. The time span covered by the journal includes the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries as well as earlier times. The journal seeks to publish contributions from a range of disciplines (for example, women"s studies, history, sociology, cultural studies, literature, political science, anthropology, philosophy and media studies) that further feminist knowledge and debate about women and/or gender relations in history. The Editors welcome a variety of approaches from people from different countries and backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信