Effect of three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid block: a prospective randomized double-blind trial

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ashita Mowar, Vishwadeepak Singh, A. Pahade, Geeta Karki
{"title":"Effect of three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid block: a prospective randomized double-blind trial","authors":"Ashita Mowar, Vishwadeepak Singh, A. Pahade, Geeta Karki","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dexmedetomidine has increasingly been used in regional anesthesia as an adjuvant, but there is still no consensus on the optimum dose when it is used intrathecally. We conducted this study to elucidate the dose-response relation between three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (2.5, 5, or 10 µg) as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. \nMethodology: 90 patients, aged 18-60 y, were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Group A received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5 ml) with 2.5 µg dexmedetomidine, Group B received 5 µg dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine, and Group C received 10 µg dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine. Duration of the spinal sensory blockade (primary outcome), onset of the blockade, time to rescue analgesia, level of sedation, duration of motor blockade, comparison of hemodynamic variables and complications, if any were assessed. \nResults: There was a significant dose dependent prolongation of sensory block; Group A - 250.67 ± 51.39, Group B - 286 ± 52.76, and Group C - 351.00 ± 47.00 min; (p < 0.001), motor block; Group A - 255.53 ± 44.25, Group B - 312 ± 29.64, and Group C - 361.4 ± 16.14 min (p < 0.001). Time to two segment regression was 132.33 ± 48.29, 148.77 ± 48.89, 171.57 ± 25.46 min (p = 0.002) and time for rescue analgesia was 351.33 ± 101.19, 472.00 ± 24.41, 738.00 ± 67.79 min (p < 0.001). VAS was significantly low in Group C (p < 0.05). Intergroup hemodynamic parameters were comparable (p > 0.05) without any appreciable side effects. \nConclusion: Spinal dexmedetomidine increases the sensory and motor block durations as well as time to first analgesic use, and decreases analgesic consumption in a dose-dependent manner, when used with hyperbaric bupivacaine. \nAbbreviations: IT - Intrathecal; ITD - Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine; SAB - Subarachnoid Block; VAS - Visual Analogue Scale; BMI - Body Mass Index; NIBP - Non-Invasive Blood Pressure; RSS - Ramsay Sedation Score; TSSR - Two segment sensory regression; ANOVA - Analysis of Variance; OSB - Onset of sensory block, TSSRT - Two segment sensory regression time; Duration of sensory blockade; OMB - Onset of motor block; DMB - Duration of motor blockade \nKey words: Dexmedetomidine; Bupivacaine; Anesthesia, Spinal; Dexmedetomidine; Post-operative analgesia \nCitation: Mowar A, Singh V, Pahade A, Karki G. Effect of three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid block: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):8–13; \nDOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1759 \nReceived: July 24, 2021, Reviewed: November 18, 2021, Accepted: November 28, 2021","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dexmedetomidine has increasingly been used in regional anesthesia as an adjuvant, but there is still no consensus on the optimum dose when it is used intrathecally. We conducted this study to elucidate the dose-response relation between three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (2.5, 5, or 10 µg) as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. Methodology: 90 patients, aged 18-60 y, were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Group A received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5 ml) with 2.5 µg dexmedetomidine, Group B received 5 µg dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine, and Group C received 10 µg dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine. Duration of the spinal sensory blockade (primary outcome), onset of the blockade, time to rescue analgesia, level of sedation, duration of motor blockade, comparison of hemodynamic variables and complications, if any were assessed. Results: There was a significant dose dependent prolongation of sensory block; Group A - 250.67 ± 51.39, Group B - 286 ± 52.76, and Group C - 351.00 ± 47.00 min; (p < 0.001), motor block; Group A - 255.53 ± 44.25, Group B - 312 ± 29.64, and Group C - 361.4 ± 16.14 min (p < 0.001). Time to two segment regression was 132.33 ± 48.29, 148.77 ± 48.89, 171.57 ± 25.46 min (p = 0.002) and time for rescue analgesia was 351.33 ± 101.19, 472.00 ± 24.41, 738.00 ± 67.79 min (p < 0.001). VAS was significantly low in Group C (p < 0.05). Intergroup hemodynamic parameters were comparable (p > 0.05) without any appreciable side effects. Conclusion: Spinal dexmedetomidine increases the sensory and motor block durations as well as time to first analgesic use, and decreases analgesic consumption in a dose-dependent manner, when used with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Abbreviations: IT - Intrathecal; ITD - Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine; SAB - Subarachnoid Block; VAS - Visual Analogue Scale; BMI - Body Mass Index; NIBP - Non-Invasive Blood Pressure; RSS - Ramsay Sedation Score; TSSR - Two segment sensory regression; ANOVA - Analysis of Variance; OSB - Onset of sensory block, TSSRT - Two segment sensory regression time; Duration of sensory blockade; OMB - Onset of motor block; DMB - Duration of motor blockade Key words: Dexmedetomidine; Bupivacaine; Anesthesia, Spinal; Dexmedetomidine; Post-operative analgesia Citation: Mowar A, Singh V, Pahade A, Karki G. Effect of three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid block: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):8–13; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1759 Received: July 24, 2021, Reviewed: November 18, 2021, Accepted: November 28, 2021
三种不同剂量鞘内右美托咪定对蛛网膜下腔阻滞的影响:一项前瞻性随机双盲试验
背景:右美托咪定越来越多地被用作区域麻醉的辅助剂,但在鞘内使用时,其最佳剂量仍未达成共识。我们进行了这项研究,以阐明三种不同剂量的鞘内右美托咪定(2.5、5或10µg)作为0.5%高压布比卡因的辅助剂,在选择性下腹部和下肢手术患者中的剂量-反应关系。方法:90例患者,年龄18 ~ 60岁,随机分为三组,每组30例。A组给予0.5%高压布比卡因12.5 mg (2.5 ml)加右美托咪定2.5µg, B组给予右美托咪定5µg加布比卡因,C组给予右美托咪定10µg加布比卡因。评估脊髓感觉阻滞的持续时间(主要结果)、阻滞的开始时间、镇痛恢复时间、镇静水平、运动阻滞的持续时间、血流动力学变量和并发症的比较(如果有的话)。结果:感觉阻滞延长有明显的剂量依赖性;A组- 250.67±51.39 min, B组- 286±52.76 min, C组- 351.00±47.00 min;(p < 0.001),电机块;A组- 255.53±44.25 min, B组- 312±29.64 min, C组- 361.4±16.14 min (p < 0.001)。两段回归时间分别为132.33±48.29、148.77±48.89、171.57±25.46 min (p = 0.002),抢救镇痛时间分别为351.33±101.19、472.00±24.41、738.00±67.79 min (p < 0.001)。C组VAS评分显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。两组间血流动力学参数比较(p < 0.05),无明显副作用。结论:脊柱右美托咪定与高压布比卡因一起使用时,增加了感觉和运动阻滞持续时间以及首次使用镇痛药的时间,并以剂量依赖的方式减少了镇痛药的消耗。缩写:IT—鞘内;ITD -鞘内注射右美托咪定;蛛网膜下腔阻滞;视觉模拟量表;BMI—身体质量指数;NIBP—无创血压;Ramsay镇静评分;TSSR -两段感觉回归;方差分析;方差分析;OSB -感觉阻滞开始时间,TSSRT -两段感觉回归时间;感觉阻滞持续时间;OMB -运动阻滞的开始;DMB -运动阻滞时间关键词:右美托咪定;Bupivacaine;脊髓麻醉;Dexmedetomidine;引用本文:Mowar A, Singh V, Pahade A, Karki G.三种不同剂量鞘内右美托咪定对蛛网膜下腔阻滞的影响:一项前瞻性随机双盲试验。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2021;26(1):8-13;收稿日期:2021年7月24日,审稿日期:2021年11月18日,接受日期:2021年11月28日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信