The role of sonication in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection in total shoulder arthroplasty.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Julie Mannaerts, Verena Wijnen, Melissa Depypere, Filip Verhaegen, Philippe Debeer
{"title":"The role of sonication in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection in total shoulder arthroplasty.","authors":"Julie Mannaerts,&nbsp;Verena Wijnen,&nbsp;Melissa Depypere,&nbsp;Filip Verhaegen,&nbsp;Philippe Debeer","doi":"10.52628/89.2.10875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increased sensitivity of sonication compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of hip and knee arthroplasty has been reported. The goal of this study was to determine if there is also an added value of implant sonication in the diagnosis of PJI in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent removal of their TSA combined with sonication of the implant for suspicion of PJI between April 2009 and August 2017 was performed. The diagnosis of PJI was based on the major criteria described by Parvizi. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and diagnostic accuracy for sonication cultures in comparison with periprosthetic tissue cultures. Data from 41 patients were analysed. Standard synovial fluid cultures combined with intraoperative periprosthetic tissue cultures had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 95% and total accuracy of 95%. Sonication cultures had a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 68% and total accuracy of 80%. Six patients had negative standard cultures but positive sonication cultures. In patients with only one positive standard culture, the pathogen of the sonication culture corresponded to the pathogen of the positive soft tissue culture. We found a possible added value of sonication of TSA in the diagnosis of PJI in conjunction with standard intraoperative cultures. In some patients with suspicion of low-grade TSA infection, sonication could identify a possible causal microorganism despite negative standard cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.2.10875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An increased sensitivity of sonication compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of hip and knee arthroplasty has been reported. The goal of this study was to determine if there is also an added value of implant sonication in the diagnosis of PJI in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent removal of their TSA combined with sonication of the implant for suspicion of PJI between April 2009 and August 2017 was performed. The diagnosis of PJI was based on the major criteria described by Parvizi. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and diagnostic accuracy for sonication cultures in comparison with periprosthetic tissue cultures. Data from 41 patients were analysed. Standard synovial fluid cultures combined with intraoperative periprosthetic tissue cultures had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 95% and total accuracy of 95%. Sonication cultures had a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 68% and total accuracy of 80%. Six patients had negative standard cultures but positive sonication cultures. In patients with only one positive standard culture, the pathogen of the sonication culture corresponded to the pathogen of the positive soft tissue culture. We found a possible added value of sonication of TSA in the diagnosis of PJI in conjunction with standard intraoperative cultures. In some patients with suspicion of low-grade TSA infection, sonication could identify a possible causal microorganism despite negative standard cultures.

超声在全肩关节置换术中假体周围关节感染诊断中的作用
据报道,在髋关节和膝关节置换术的假体周围关节感染(PJI)诊断中,与假体周围组织培养相比,超声处理的敏感性增加。本研究的目的是确定植入物超声处理在全肩关节置换术(TSA)中诊断PJI是否也有附加价值。对2009年4月至2017年8月期间因怀疑PJI而接受TSA切除和植入物超声处理的患者进行了回顾性分析。PJI的诊断是基于Parvizi描述的主要标准。我们计算了超声培养与假体周围组织培养的敏感性、特异性、预测值、似然比和诊断准确性。对41名患者的数据进行了分析。标准滑膜液培养结合术中假体周围组织培养的敏感性为95%,特异性为95%,总准确率为95%。超声培养的敏感性为91%,特异性为68%,总准确率为80%。6名患者的标准培养呈阴性,但超声培养呈阳性。在只有一种阳性标准培养的患者中,超声培养的病原体与阳性软组织培养的病原体相对应。我们发现TSA的超声处理结合标准术中培养在PJI诊断中可能具有附加价值。在一些怀疑TSA感染程度较低的患者中,尽管标准培养呈阴性,但超声处理可以确定可能的致病微生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信