Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of AMG 986 Tablet and Capsule Formulations in Healthy Adult Subjects: A Phase I, Open-Label, Randomized Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs in Research & Development Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s40268-022-00388-1
Ashit Trivedi, Y-H Kiang, Robert E Saw, Guilong Charles Cheng, Omar Mather, Silvia Vega, Jennifer Hellawell, Edward Lee
{"title":"Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of AMG 986 Tablet and Capsule Formulations in Healthy Adult Subjects: A Phase I, Open-Label, Randomized Study.","authors":"Ashit Trivedi,&nbsp;Y-H Kiang,&nbsp;Robert E Saw,&nbsp;Guilong Charles Cheng,&nbsp;Omar Mather,&nbsp;Silvia Vega,&nbsp;Jennifer Hellawell,&nbsp;Edward Lee","doi":"10.1007/s40268-022-00388-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>AMG 986 is a first-in-class, novel apelin receptor small molecule agonist initially developed for the treatment of heart failure. The current phase I study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single-dose 200-mg capsule formulation of AMG 986 relative to the tablet formulation in 12 healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a two-period, two-way crossover design, eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to tablet/capsule or capsule/tablet treatment sequences; each treatment sequence lasted for approximately 6 days and comprised six subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following a single oral dose of AMG 986, the geometric mean maximum observed concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) values were 9670 ng/mL and 6920 ng/mL and the geometric mean area under the curve from time zero to 120 h (AUC<sub>0-120h</sub>) values were 68,000 ng*h/mL and 59,900 ng*h/mL for the tablet and capsule, respectively. The geometric least squares means (90% confidence interval [90% CI]) for the ratios of capsule/tablet were 0.88 (90% CI 0.81-0.96) and 0.72 (90% CI 0.57-0.91) for AUC<sub>0-120h</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>, respectively. AMG 986 had an acceptable safety profile; all adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a modest 12% decrease in AUC<sub>0-120h</sub> and a 28% decrease in C<sub>max</sub> with the AMG 986 capsule versus the tablet. These differences are not considered to be clinically relevant, suggesting the capsule formulation can be used in subsequent clinical studies of AMG 986.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":"22 1","pages":"147-154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167409/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-022-00388-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and objective: AMG 986 is a first-in-class, novel apelin receptor small molecule agonist initially developed for the treatment of heart failure. The current phase I study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single-dose 200-mg capsule formulation of AMG 986 relative to the tablet formulation in 12 healthy subjects.

Methods: In a two-period, two-way crossover design, eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to tablet/capsule or capsule/tablet treatment sequences; each treatment sequence lasted for approximately 6 days and comprised six subjects.

Results: Following a single oral dose of AMG 986, the geometric mean maximum observed concentration (Cmax) values were 9670 ng/mL and 6920 ng/mL and the geometric mean area under the curve from time zero to 120 h (AUC0-120h) values were 68,000 ng*h/mL and 59,900 ng*h/mL for the tablet and capsule, respectively. The geometric least squares means (90% confidence interval [90% CI]) for the ratios of capsule/tablet were 0.88 (90% CI 0.81-0.96) and 0.72 (90% CI 0.57-0.91) for AUC0-120h and Cmax, respectively. AMG 986 had an acceptable safety profile; all adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity.

Conclusion: There was a modest 12% decrease in AUC0-120h and a 28% decrease in Cmax with the AMG 986 capsule versus the tablet. These differences are not considered to be clinically relevant, suggesting the capsule formulation can be used in subsequent clinical studies of AMG 986.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

AMG 986片剂和胶囊制剂在健康成年受试者中的药代动力学和安全性评估:一项I期开放标签随机研究
背景和目的:AMG 986是一种新型阿哌林受体小分子激动剂,最初用于治疗心力衰竭。目前的I期研究旨在评估AMG 986单剂量200mg胶囊制剂相对于片剂制剂在12名健康受试者中的药代动力学和安全性。方法:在两阶段双向交叉设计中,符合条件的受试者被1:1随机分配到片剂/胶囊或胶囊/片剂治疗序列;每个治疗序列持续约6天,包括6名受试者。结果:单次口服AMG 986后,片剂和胶囊的几何平均最大观察浓度(Cmax)值分别为9670 ng/mL和6920 ng/mL,从0到120小时的曲线下几何平均面积(AUC0-120h)值分别是68000 ng/mL和59900 ng/mL。AUC0-120h和Cmax的胶囊/片剂比率的几何最小二乘平均值(90%置信区间[90%CI])分别为0.88(90%CI 0.81-0.96)和0.72(90%CI 0.57-0.91)。AMG 986具有可接受的安全性;所有不良事件的严重程度均为1级或2级。结论:与片剂相比,AMG 986胶囊的AUC0-120h适度降低了12%,Cmax降低了28%。这些差异被认为与临床无关,这表明该胶囊制剂可用于AMG 986的后续临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信