Linguistic scenery in Latvian botany textbooks (1880s–1940s): Stable and varying features

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Jānis Veckrācis
{"title":"Linguistic scenery in Latvian botany textbooks (1880s–1940s): Stable and varying features","authors":"Jānis Veckrācis","doi":"10.5755/j01.sal.1.42.33104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Texts, including original botany textbooks (not translations or adaptations) produced in the second part of the 19th century and early decades of the 20th century embody a period of intense linguistic development in the Latvian language. This paper provides a linguistic analysis of the features of two botany textbooks: Botānika tautas skolām un pašmācībai (Botany for Folk Schools and Self-Education) by Jānis Ilsters (1883) and Botānika (Botany) by Pauls Galenieks, also citing its further editions (1924–1945). The aim of the study is to collate data that is representative of morphological, syntactic and lexical changes and stable elements from these texts. The respective linguistic phenomena are discussed and analysed in the context of language facts present in several dictionaries and other relevant publications. The data obtained in this study illustrates that by the end of the period covered in this paper, the process of turbulent linguistic changes in the Latvian language had been replaced by more balanced development with some indications of stabilisation, although numerous features remained variable and dynamic. Despite a number of the syntactic and lexical elements recorded in the main sources of the study having since changed and/or become obsolete, these textbooks provide evidence that both the Latvian language and the linguistic materials used in botany were to a great extent already well developed and had begun to enter the stabilisation phase. In recent years, botany has become an area of increased linguistic interest among botany experts and linguists themselves, although the collation of a detailed data set detailing the development of the whole body of specialised lexis used in botany remains a task for the future.","PeriodicalId":37822,"journal":{"name":"Studies About Languages","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies About Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.1.42.33104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Texts, including original botany textbooks (not translations or adaptations) produced in the second part of the 19th century and early decades of the 20th century embody a period of intense linguistic development in the Latvian language. This paper provides a linguistic analysis of the features of two botany textbooks: Botānika tautas skolām un pašmācībai (Botany for Folk Schools and Self-Education) by Jānis Ilsters (1883) and Botānika (Botany) by Pauls Galenieks, also citing its further editions (1924–1945). The aim of the study is to collate data that is representative of morphological, syntactic and lexical changes and stable elements from these texts. The respective linguistic phenomena are discussed and analysed in the context of language facts present in several dictionaries and other relevant publications. The data obtained in this study illustrates that by the end of the period covered in this paper, the process of turbulent linguistic changes in the Latvian language had been replaced by more balanced development with some indications of stabilisation, although numerous features remained variable and dynamic. Despite a number of the syntactic and lexical elements recorded in the main sources of the study having since changed and/or become obsolete, these textbooks provide evidence that both the Latvian language and the linguistic materials used in botany were to a great extent already well developed and had begun to enter the stabilisation phase. In recent years, botany has become an area of increased linguistic interest among botany experts and linguists themselves, although the collation of a detailed data set detailing the development of the whole body of specialised lexis used in botany remains a task for the future.
拉脱维亚植物学教科书中的语言风景(19世纪80年代至40年代):稳定而多变的特征
19世纪下半叶和20世纪初出版的文本,包括原始植物学教科书(而非翻译或改编),体现了拉脱维亚语语言的激烈发展时期。本文对两本植物学教科书的特点进行了语言学分析:Jānis Ilsters(1883)的《民间学校和自学植物学》和Pauls Galenieks的《植物学》,并引用了其后续版本(1924–1945)。本研究的目的是从这些文本中整理代表形态、句法和词汇变化以及稳定元素的数据。在几本词典和其他相关出版物中出现的语言事实的背景下,对各自的语言现象进行了讨论和分析。这项研究中获得的数据表明,到本文所涵盖的时期结束时,拉脱维亚语动荡的语言变化过程已被更平衡的发展所取代,并有一些稳定的迹象,尽管许多特征仍然是可变的和动态的。尽管研究的主要来源中记录的一些句法和词汇元素已经改变和/或过时,但这些教科书提供的证据表明,拉脱维亚语和植物学中使用的语言材料在很大程度上已经得到了很好的发展,并已开始进入稳定阶段。近年来,植物学已经成为植物学专家和语言学家自己越来越感兴趣的语言学领域,尽管整理详细说明植物学中使用的整个专业词汇发展的详细数据集仍然是未来的一项任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies About Languages
Studies About Languages Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims at bringing together the scholars interested in languages and technology, linguistic theory development, empirical research of different aspects of languages functioning within a society. The articles published in the journal focus on theoretical and empirical research, including General Linguistics, Applied Linguistics (Translation studies, Computational Linguistics, Sociolinguistics, Media Linguistics, etc.), Comparative and Contrastive Linguistics. The journal aims at becoming a multidisciplinary venue of sharing ideas and experience among the scholars working in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信