Comparison of differences in post-cesarean section infection following a three-dose prophylactic antibiotic regimen and no prescription of antibiotics, a randomized clinical trial

dnshnmh Srm Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.52547/sjrm.5.1.42
Mojghan Karamnia Far, A. Saremi, Mohammad Reza Nateghi (MD, MPH), Maryam Sanaye Naderi
{"title":"Comparison of differences in post-cesarean section infection following a three-dose prophylactic antibiotic regimen and no prescription of antibiotics, a randomized clinical trial","authors":"Mojghan Karamnia Far, A. Saremi, Mohammad Reza Nateghi (MD, MPH), Maryam Sanaye Naderi","doi":"10.52547/sjrm.5.1.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Inappropriate administration of antibiotics, in addition to increasing costs and drug reactions, can lead to the spread of resistant bacterial infections. Some studies have suggested that preoperative antibiotics are effective in reducing surgical infection. Other studies have shown that there is no difference between prescribing one-dose and three-dose antibiotics after surgery. Due to the lack of agreement on the use or non-use of antibiotics after surgery, the present study was performed to determine the effectiveness of antibiotics after elective cesarean section in reducing the rate of infection. Material and methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 63 patients who were candidates for elective cesarean section received a dose of antibiotics (Cefazolin, 2g, intravenous injection) one hour before surgery. They were then randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group (n=37) received three doses of antibiotics (Cefazolin, 2g every 6h, intravenous injection), while the control group (n=26) did not receive any postoperative antibiotics. Patients were followed up for 40 days after surgery and the effectiveness of these two methods in preventing infection was investigated. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in any of the parameters of age, weight, height and body mass index. Also, there was no significant difference between the rate of infection after cesarean section between the group receiving antibiotics and the control group ( P> 0.05 ). Conclusion: Findings of this study showed that receiving antibiotics after the cesarean section has no effect on the prevention of surgical infection. According to the results of this study, as well as the increase in microbial resistance to antibiotics and treatment costs, antibiotics can be discontinued after elective cesarean section.","PeriodicalId":33200,"journal":{"name":"dnshnmh Srm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"dnshnmh Srm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/sjrm.5.1.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Inappropriate administration of antibiotics, in addition to increasing costs and drug reactions, can lead to the spread of resistant bacterial infections. Some studies have suggested that preoperative antibiotics are effective in reducing surgical infection. Other studies have shown that there is no difference between prescribing one-dose and three-dose antibiotics after surgery. Due to the lack of agreement on the use or non-use of antibiotics after surgery, the present study was performed to determine the effectiveness of antibiotics after elective cesarean section in reducing the rate of infection. Material and methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 63 patients who were candidates for elective cesarean section received a dose of antibiotics (Cefazolin, 2g, intravenous injection) one hour before surgery. They were then randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group (n=37) received three doses of antibiotics (Cefazolin, 2g every 6h, intravenous injection), while the control group (n=26) did not receive any postoperative antibiotics. Patients were followed up for 40 days after surgery and the effectiveness of these two methods in preventing infection was investigated. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in any of the parameters of age, weight, height and body mass index. Also, there was no significant difference between the rate of infection after cesarean section between the group receiving antibiotics and the control group ( P> 0.05 ). Conclusion: Findings of this study showed that receiving antibiotics after the cesarean section has no effect on the prevention of surgical infection. According to the results of this study, as well as the increase in microbial resistance to antibiotics and treatment costs, antibiotics can be discontinued after elective cesarean section.
一项随机临床试验:三剂量预防性抗生素治疗与未处方抗生素治疗在剖宫产术后感染的差异比较
目的:抗生素的不当使用,除了增加成本和药物反应外,还可能导致耐药细菌感染的传播。一些研究表明,术前使用抗生素可以有效减少手术感染。其他研究表明,手术后开一剂和三剂抗生素没有区别。由于对术后使用或不使用抗生素缺乏一致意见,本研究旨在确定选择性剖宫产术后使用抗生素降低感染率的有效性。材料和方法:在这项随机临床试验中,63名择期剖宫产患者在手术前1小时接受了一定剂量的抗生素(头孢唑林,2g,静脉注射)。然后将他们随机分为两组。干预组(n=37)接受三剂抗生素(头孢唑林,每6小时2g,静脉注射),而对照组(n=26)不接受任何术后抗生素。术后对患者进行了40天的随访,并研究了这两种方法在预防感染方面的有效性。结果:干预组与对照组在年龄、体重、身高和体重指数等指标上均无统计学差异。剖宫产术后应用抗生素组与对照组的感染率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,剖宫产术后使用抗生素对预防手术感染没有效果。根据这项研究的结果,以及微生物对抗生素耐药性和治疗费用的增加,选择性剖宫产后可以停止使用抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信