Robust combined operating room planning and personnel scheduling under uncertainty

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dominic J. Breuer , Nadia Lahrichi , David E. Clark , James C. Benneyan
{"title":"Robust combined operating room planning and personnel scheduling under uncertainty","authors":"Dominic J. Breuer ,&nbsp;Nadia Lahrichi ,&nbsp;David E. Clark ,&nbsp;James C. Benneyan","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2020.100276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Providing timely access to costly surgical services in a manner that balances needs of multiple stakeholders (patients, staff, administrators) is made even more challenging by inherent uncertainty. Decisions about clinician scheduling, shift preferences, operating room planning, and patient assignment also often are decentralized or made separately. We develop a robust optimization model that combines staffing and scheduling decisions to minimize the impact of foreseeable variation in surgery durations, staff availability, and urgent or emergency arrivals. Model performance is tested with data from a major academic medical center, resulting in improved service level (% patients served), overtime, utilization, and shift preferences. Although robustness to staffing, duration, and urgent or emergency uncertainty increases operating costs by 6% on average, overtime is reduced by 68% while utilization decreases by only 6%. The number of necessary schedule adjustments on the day of surgery also is reduced by 13% on average in the robust model compared to the nominal model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orhc.2020.100276","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692320300564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Providing timely access to costly surgical services in a manner that balances needs of multiple stakeholders (patients, staff, administrators) is made even more challenging by inherent uncertainty. Decisions about clinician scheduling, shift preferences, operating room planning, and patient assignment also often are decentralized or made separately. We develop a robust optimization model that combines staffing and scheduling decisions to minimize the impact of foreseeable variation in surgery durations, staff availability, and urgent or emergency arrivals. Model performance is tested with data from a major academic medical center, resulting in improved service level (% patients served), overtime, utilization, and shift preferences. Although robustness to staffing, duration, and urgent or emergency uncertainty increases operating costs by 6% on average, overtime is reduced by 68% while utilization decreases by only 6%. The number of necessary schedule adjustments on the day of surgery also is reduced by 13% on average in the robust model compared to the nominal model.

不确定条件下的鲁棒联合手术室规划与人员调度
由于固有的不确定性,以平衡多个利益攸关方(患者、工作人员和管理人员)需求的方式及时提供昂贵的手术服务变得更具挑战性。关于临床医生安排、轮班偏好、手术室计划和病人分配的决定也经常是分散的或单独制定的。我们开发了一个强大的优化模型,该模型结合了人员配备和调度决策,以最大限度地减少手术持续时间、人员可用性和紧急或紧急到达的可预见变化的影响。使用来自主要学术医疗中心的数据对模型性能进行了测试,结果提高了服务水平(服务患者百分比)、加班时间、利用率和轮班偏好。尽管对人员配置、工期和紧急或紧急不确定性的稳健性平均增加了6%的运营成本,但加班时间减少了68%,利用率仅下降了6%。与名义模型相比,在稳健模型中,手术当天必要的时间表调整次数平均减少了13%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信