The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Trust in the Relationship between Formality of Performance Evaluation and Managerial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Zarinah Abdul Rasit, Nurul Nadiah Kamalolzaman, Sharina Tajul Urus, Nadiah Abd Hamid
{"title":"The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Trust in the Relationship between Formality of Performance Evaluation and Managerial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia","authors":"Zarinah Abdul Rasit, Nurul Nadiah Kamalolzaman, Sharina Tajul Urus, Nadiah Abd Hamid","doi":"10.24191/apmaj.v17i2-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Performance Measurement System (PMS) for performance evaluation is used primarily for motivation and evaluating employee performance. The mixed findings on behavioural consequences of performance evaluation from previous research suggest further research to examine its effect on individual performance. This research examined the role of interpersonal trust in the design and function of a control system, specifically the formality of a performance evaluation system in emerging economies. Data was gathered using survey questionnaires that were distributed to higher-level executives and managers of Malaysian Government-Linked Companies (GLCs). The research proposed that subordinates’ interpersonal trust may influence the relationship between the formality of a performance evaluationsystem and managerial performance. Using regression analysis, the research revealed that the use of PMS for performance evaluation may influence individual behaviour. The findings confirm the researchers’ expectation that the formality of performance evaluation has a significant influence on interpersonal trust, leading to enhanced managerial performance. There is also evidence of interpersonal trust having a mediating effect between the formality of performance evaluation and managerial performance when tested using the Sobel Test. These findings provide evidence that PMS as a formal performance evaluation may enhance trust, which is significant for improving individual performance. Keywords: formality of performance evaluation, interpersonal trust, managerial performance","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v17i2-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Performance Measurement System (PMS) for performance evaluation is used primarily for motivation and evaluating employee performance. The mixed findings on behavioural consequences of performance evaluation from previous research suggest further research to examine its effect on individual performance. This research examined the role of interpersonal trust in the design and function of a control system, specifically the formality of a performance evaluation system in emerging economies. Data was gathered using survey questionnaires that were distributed to higher-level executives and managers of Malaysian Government-Linked Companies (GLCs). The research proposed that subordinates’ interpersonal trust may influence the relationship between the formality of a performance evaluationsystem and managerial performance. Using regression analysis, the research revealed that the use of PMS for performance evaluation may influence individual behaviour. The findings confirm the researchers’ expectation that the formality of performance evaluation has a significant influence on interpersonal trust, leading to enhanced managerial performance. There is also evidence of interpersonal trust having a mediating effect between the formality of performance evaluation and managerial performance when tested using the Sobel Test. These findings provide evidence that PMS as a formal performance evaluation may enhance trust, which is significant for improving individual performance. Keywords: formality of performance evaluation, interpersonal trust, managerial performance
人际信任在绩效评估形式性与管理绩效关系中的中介作用——来自马来西亚的经验证据
用于绩效评估的绩效衡量系统(PMS)主要用于激励和评估员工绩效。先前研究对绩效评估的行为后果的研究结果喜忧参半,这表明需要进一步研究其对个人绩效的影响。本研究考察了人际信任在控制系统设计和功能中的作用,特别是新兴经济体绩效评估系统的形式。数据是通过发放给马来西亚政府关联公司(GLCs)高级管理人员和经理的调查问卷收集的。研究表明,下属的人际信任可能会影响绩效评估系统的形式与管理绩效之间的关系。通过回归分析,研究表明,使用PMS进行绩效评估可能会影响个人行为。研究结果证实了研究人员的预期,即绩效评估的形式对人际信任有显著影响,从而提高管理绩效。当使用索贝尔测试进行测试时,也有证据表明人际信任在绩效评估的形式和管理绩效之间具有中介作用。这些发现提供了证据,表明PMS作为一种正式的绩效评估可以增强信任,这对提高个人绩效具有重要意义。关键词:绩效评估形式、人际信任、管理绩效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信