¿Ciegos ante la Perspectiva de Género o Ciegos ante la Evidencia Empírica sobre la Violencia en las Relaciones de Pareja? Comentario a Ferrer-Pérez y Bosch-Fiol, 2019

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
N. Pereda, J. Tamarit
{"title":"¿Ciegos ante la Perspectiva de Género o Ciegos ante la Evidencia Empírica sobre la Violencia en las Relaciones de Pareja? Comentario a Ferrer-Pérez y Bosch-Fiol, 2019","authors":"N. Pereda, J. Tamarit","doi":"10.5093/APJ2019A6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors answers the article in which empirical studies revealing that violence in relationships is a complex and multicausal phenomenon affecting both sexes are accused of gender blindness. A review is made of fallacies that underlie a discourse based on the suppression of all evidence against the prevailing ideology, citing only reports containing data of violence committed by men against women. The main problems that this distorted vision of reality entails for the implementation of programs for the prevention and treatment of violence are also addressed. As a consequence of this evidence blindness, there is a lack of resources to help and support male victims and women who use violence in their intimate relationships.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2019A6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The authors answers the article in which empirical studies revealing that violence in relationships is a complex and multicausal phenomenon affecting both sexes are accused of gender blindness. A review is made of fallacies that underlie a discourse based on the suppression of all evidence against the prevailing ideology, citing only reports containing data of violence committed by men against women. The main problems that this distorted vision of reality entails for the implementation of programs for the prevention and treatment of violence are also addressed. As a consequence of this evidence blindness, there is a lack of resources to help and support male victims and women who use violence in their intimate relationships.
对性别观点视而不见还是对夫妻关系中暴力的经验证据视而不见?对ferrer - perez和Bosch-Fiol的评论,2019
作者回答了这篇文章,在这篇文章中,实证研究表明,关系中的暴力是一种复杂的、影响两性的多配偶现象,被指责为性别盲。对一种基于压制所有反对主流意识形态的证据的言论背后的谬论进行了审查,只引用了包含男性对女性施暴数据的报告。这一扭曲的现实愿景为实施预防和治疗暴力方案所带来的主要问题也得到了解决。由于这种证据的盲目性,缺乏资源来帮助和支持在亲密关系中使用暴力的男性受害者和女性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信