Global Libraries impact planning and assessment progress: part 2

IF 1.8 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
D. Streatfield, Richard Abisla, Umut Al, V. Bunescu, Yulianto Dewata, Camila Garroux, Daniela Greeb, Artiom Maister, J. Paley, Shipra Sharma, Tripti Sharma, Irem Soydal, T. Trần
{"title":"Global Libraries impact planning and assessment progress: part 2","authors":"D. Streatfield, Richard Abisla, Umut Al, V. Bunescu, Yulianto Dewata, Camila Garroux, Daniela Greeb, Artiom Maister, J. Paley, Shipra Sharma, Tripti Sharma, Irem Soydal, T. Trần","doi":"10.1108/PMM-03-2019-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to report on recent performance measurement and impact evaluation progress made in Brazil, India, Indonesia, Moldova, Turkey and Vietnam as part of the last phase of the Global Libraries Initiative.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe country reports are presented as a series of case studies, in some cases supplementing those reported earlier in this journal.\n\n\nFindings\nRecent country-specific survey findings are reported and some conclusions are offered.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper demonstrates how the adoption of a common approach to library service evaluation across several countries can strengthen research practice at country level beyond the Global Libraries Initiative itself.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper shares Global Libraries IPA learning at country level with people in other countries who may be contemplating public library evaluation at regional, national or local levels or who are interested in performance measurement and impact evaluation.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe paper shows how focusing on the impact of public library services on users can enhance the understanding of community requirements and inform the development of more effective services to library users and communities.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThese case studies reflect concentrated impact evaluation and performance measurement work at country level across a range of countries over more than 18 years.\n","PeriodicalId":44583,"journal":{"name":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/PMM-03-2019-0007","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-03-2019-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report on recent performance measurement and impact evaluation progress made in Brazil, India, Indonesia, Moldova, Turkey and Vietnam as part of the last phase of the Global Libraries Initiative. Design/methodology/approach The country reports are presented as a series of case studies, in some cases supplementing those reported earlier in this journal. Findings Recent country-specific survey findings are reported and some conclusions are offered. Research limitations/implications This paper demonstrates how the adoption of a common approach to library service evaluation across several countries can strengthen research practice at country level beyond the Global Libraries Initiative itself. Practical implications This paper shares Global Libraries IPA learning at country level with people in other countries who may be contemplating public library evaluation at regional, national or local levels or who are interested in performance measurement and impact evaluation. Social implications The paper shows how focusing on the impact of public library services on users can enhance the understanding of community requirements and inform the development of more effective services to library users and communities. Originality/value These case studies reflect concentrated impact evaluation and performance measurement work at country level across a range of countries over more than 18 years.
全球图书馆影响规划和评估进展:第2部分
目的本文旨在报告作为全球图书馆倡议最后阶段的一部分,巴西、印度、印度尼西亚、摩尔多瓦、土耳其和越南最近在绩效衡量和影响评估方面取得的进展。设计/方法/方法国别报告是以一系列案例研究的形式提出的,在某些情况下是对本期刊早些时候报告的补充。调查结果报告了最近针对具体国家的调查结果,并给出了一些结论。研究局限性/含义本文展示了在几个国家采用一种共同的图书馆服务评估方法如何在全球图书馆倡议本身之外加强国家一级的研究实践。实际意义本文与其他国家的人分享了全球图书馆IPA在国家层面的学习,这些人可能正在考虑在地区、国家或地方层面对公共图书馆进行评估,或者对绩效衡量和影响评估感兴趣。社会含义本文展示了关注公共图书馆服务对用户的影响如何增强对社区需求的理解,并为图书馆用户和社区开发更有效的服务提供信息。原创性/价值这些案例研究反映了18年来一系列国家在国家一级进行的集中影响评估和绩效衡量工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Performance Measurement and Metrics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: ■Quantitative and qualitative analysis ■Benchmarking ■The measurement and role of information in enhancing organizational effectiveness ■Quality techniques and quality improvement ■Training and education ■Methods for performance measurement and metrics ■Standard assessment tools ■Using emerging technologies ■Setting standards or service quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信