The Use of the Preliminary Ruling Procedure by Czech Courts: Historical Retrospective and Beyond

Baltic Journal of European Studies Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1515/bjes-2019-0041

V. Stehlík, David Sehnálek

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The article analyses the use of the preliminary ruling procedure by the Czech courts in the 15 years of the Czech membership in the European Union. It presents statistics of cases lodged to the EU Court of Justice and refers to the most important decisions. The article compares the practise of both lower courts as well as courts of last instance, namely the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court. It also outlines the attitude of the Czech Constitutional Court towards this procedure.

查看原文本刊更多论文

捷克法院对初步裁定程序的使用:历史回顾及以后

摘要本文分析了捷克加入欧盟15年来法院对初步裁决程序的使用情况。它提供了提交给欧盟法院的案件统计数据，并提到了最重要的裁决。文章比较了下级法院和终审法院，即最高法院和最高行政法院的做法。它还概述了捷克宪法法院对这一程序的态度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Baltic Journal of European Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Baltic Journal of European Studies (abbreviation BJES) is a semiannual double blind peer-reviewed international research journal (formerly known as Proceedings of the Institute for European Studies) with an international editorial office and extensive international editorial board, abstracted in EBSCO and other relevant databases.The scope of the journal comprises a wide spectrum of social, political, economic and cultural issues related to recent developments in the European Union and its member states.