Reliability and Validity of the Mongolian version of affective touch questionnaire

Q4 Neuroscience
Enkhnaran Tumurbaatar, Oyunsuren Jargalsaikhan, Gantsetseg Tumur-Ochir, E. Belovol
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of the Mongolian version of affective touch questionnaire","authors":"Enkhnaran Tumurbaatar, Oyunsuren Jargalsaikhan, Gantsetseg Tumur-Ochir, E. Belovol","doi":"10.31117/neuroscirn.v5i2.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Communication via the sense of touch has long been perceived as an important aspect of human development, social comfort, and well-being. Human somatosensory system has in fact two tactile sub-modalities, one providing the well-recognized discriminative touch input to the brain, and the second–the affective or emotional input. C-tactile system is hypothesized to represent the neurobiological substrate for affective and rewarding properties of touch. Lower relationship quality is associated with lower resilience to stressors and can lead to increased vulnerability to mental health disorders. Based on the existing work, we know that social touch can increase well-being and lower state-anxiety. Our goal was to prove content validity for the Mongolian version with the factor structure of the original English version of the TEAQ. We translated, and adapted TEAQ for Mongolian language version. Original TEAQ-117 items were used in the pilot study. In the present study, enrolled 204 participants, age varied between 18 and 57 years (26.9±8.8), 57.8% were female. Validated TEAQ-57 items English version was used, and Exploratory factor analysis confirmed 55 items with 6 component structure. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good consistency and homogeneity of the 6 factor structure of the TEAQ, and satisfactory model fit. Several subscales of the TEAQ revealed positive correlations on quality of life domains, in contrast negative correlations with anxiety and depression. In conclusion, analysed Mongolian version of the TEAQ-55 is a reliable and valid assessment tool of experiences and attitudes towards touch, and similar to component structure for different cultures (Validated British TEAQ-57, and TEAQ-37 RUS). We expected that Mongolian version of the TEAQ might be a helpful tool for screening mental health issues and researchers.","PeriodicalId":36108,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research Notes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v5i2.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Communication via the sense of touch has long been perceived as an important aspect of human development, social comfort, and well-being. Human somatosensory system has in fact two tactile sub-modalities, one providing the well-recognized discriminative touch input to the brain, and the second–the affective or emotional input. C-tactile system is hypothesized to represent the neurobiological substrate for affective and rewarding properties of touch. Lower relationship quality is associated with lower resilience to stressors and can lead to increased vulnerability to mental health disorders. Based on the existing work, we know that social touch can increase well-being and lower state-anxiety. Our goal was to prove content validity for the Mongolian version with the factor structure of the original English version of the TEAQ. We translated, and adapted TEAQ for Mongolian language version. Original TEAQ-117 items were used in the pilot study. In the present study, enrolled 204 participants, age varied between 18 and 57 years (26.9±8.8), 57.8% were female. Validated TEAQ-57 items English version was used, and Exploratory factor analysis confirmed 55 items with 6 component structure. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good consistency and homogeneity of the 6 factor structure of the TEAQ, and satisfactory model fit. Several subscales of the TEAQ revealed positive correlations on quality of life domains, in contrast negative correlations with anxiety and depression. In conclusion, analysed Mongolian version of the TEAQ-55 is a reliable and valid assessment tool of experiences and attitudes towards touch, and similar to component structure for different cultures (Validated British TEAQ-57, and TEAQ-37 RUS). We expected that Mongolian version of the TEAQ might be a helpful tool for screening mental health issues and researchers.
蒙古族情感触摸问卷的信度和有效性
通过触觉进行交流一直被认为是人类发展、社会舒适和幸福的一个重要方面。人体体感系统实际上有两种触觉亚模态,一种是向大脑提供可识别的鉴别触觉输入,另一种是情感或情绪输入。c -触觉系统被假设代表了触觉的情感和奖励特性的神经生物学基础。较低的人际关系质量与较低的抗压力能力有关,并可能导致更容易患上精神疾病。根据现有的工作,我们知道社交接触可以增加幸福感,降低状态焦虑。我们的目标是用英语原版TEAQ的因子结构来证明蒙古语版本的内容效度。我们将TEAQ翻译成蒙古语版本。先导研究采用原始TEAQ-117项目。本研究共纳入204例受试者,年龄在18 ~ 57岁之间(26.9±8.8),其中57.8%为女性。采用经验证的TEAQ-57题项英文版,探索性因子分析确定了55个题项,共6个成分结构。验证性因子分析表明,TEAQ的6个因子结构具有良好的一致性和均匀性,模型拟合良好。TEAQ的几个分量表显示生活质量与生活质量领域呈正相关,与焦虑和抑郁呈负相关。综上所述,蒙古语版TEAQ-55是一种可靠有效的触摸体验和态度评估工具,与不同文化的成分结构相似(验证过的英国TEAQ-57和TEAQ-37 RUS)。我们期望蒙古语版的TEAQ可以成为筛选心理健康问题和研究人员的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience Research Notes
Neuroscience Research Notes Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信