Justified Discrimination in a Liberal Society

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Carlos Manuel Rosales, Oscar Ruiz Vargas
{"title":"Justified Discrimination in a Liberal Society","authors":"Carlos Manuel Rosales, Oscar Ruiz Vargas","doi":"10.46282/blr.2022.6.2.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The act of discrimination is a decision that affects the rights of third parties. Undoubtedly, its exercise and materialisation are disastrous. However, would it be possible to discriminate against a person without facing legal consequences? This work opens a space to explain that there are situations in which discrimination is carried out and validated, in which it is justified its usefulness to preserve a titled property considered as a fundamental right or safeguarding public order as a fundamental structure of the teleology of the state.","PeriodicalId":33796,"journal":{"name":"Bratislava Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bratislava Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2022.6.2.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The act of discrimination is a decision that affects the rights of third parties. Undoubtedly, its exercise and materialisation are disastrous. However, would it be possible to discriminate against a person without facing legal consequences? This work opens a space to explain that there are situations in which discrimination is carried out and validated, in which it is justified its usefulness to preserve a titled property considered as a fundamental right or safeguarding public order as a fundamental structure of the teleology of the state.
自由社会中的正当歧视
歧视行为是影响第三方权利的决定。毫无疑问,它的实施和具体化是灾难性的。然而,歧视一个人而不面临法律后果可能吗?这项工作为解释歧视在某些情况下被实施和验证提供了空间,在这些情况下,保护被视为基本权利的有产权财产或维护公共秩序作为国家目的论的基本结构是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信