An Option-Revenue Sharing Coordination Contract with Price and Sales Effort Dependent Demand

IF 0.8 Q4 MANAGEMENT
M. Rabbani, N. Manavizadeh, H. V. Arani, S. Aghamohamadi-Bosjin
{"title":"An Option-Revenue Sharing Coordination Contract with Price and Sales Effort Dependent Demand","authors":"M. Rabbani, N. Manavizadeh, H. V. Arani, S. Aghamohamadi-Bosjin","doi":"10.22059/IJMS.2019.275192.673500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study proposes a novel option-revenue sharing coordination contract framework. In the proposed model, the retailer determines the number of order sales effort. The manufacturer sets the price of products for the wholesale strategy. The investigated supply chain problem analyzes the results of different strategies. In the proposed coordination contract problem, two types of games including retailer-based game and manufacturer-based Stackelberg game are considered. In both cases the retailer adopts the value of order and the sales effort and the manufacturer determines the wholesale price. To assess the performance of the proposed contract, a wholesale and a basic selection contract are considered in the model. To obtain the Nash equilibrium in the retailer-based state of the proposed option-revenue sharing coordination contract problem, a hybrid algorithm consisting of a heuristic and a genetic algorithm is proposed by considering the computational complexities of the proposed model. A numerical comparison between the proposed contract and other cases demonstrates that the option-revenue sharing contract significantly dominates the basic option and the wholesale price contract. Finally, we implemented some numerical experiments on the critical parameters of the contract. Based on the results, increasing the price-dependency of demand results in less number of products ordered by the retailer.","PeriodicalId":51913,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Management Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"221-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMS.2019.275192.673500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a novel option-revenue sharing coordination contract framework. In the proposed model, the retailer determines the number of order sales effort. The manufacturer sets the price of products for the wholesale strategy. The investigated supply chain problem analyzes the results of different strategies. In the proposed coordination contract problem, two types of games including retailer-based game and manufacturer-based Stackelberg game are considered. In both cases the retailer adopts the value of order and the sales effort and the manufacturer determines the wholesale price. To assess the performance of the proposed contract, a wholesale and a basic selection contract are considered in the model. To obtain the Nash equilibrium in the retailer-based state of the proposed option-revenue sharing coordination contract problem, a hybrid algorithm consisting of a heuristic and a genetic algorithm is proposed by considering the computational complexities of the proposed model. A numerical comparison between the proposed contract and other cases demonstrates that the option-revenue sharing contract significantly dominates the basic option and the wholesale price contract. Finally, we implemented some numerical experiments on the critical parameters of the contract. Based on the results, increasing the price-dependency of demand results in less number of products ordered by the retailer.
基于价格和销售努力需求的期权收益共享协调契约
本研究提出了一个新的期权收益分享协调契约框架。在所提出的模型中,零售商确定订单销售努力的数量。制造商为批发策略制定产品价格。所研究的供应链问题分析了不同策略的结果。在所提出的协调契约问题中,考虑了两种类型的博弈,包括基于零售商的博弈和基于制造商的Stackelberg博弈。在这两种情况下,零售商采用订单价值和销售努力,制造商确定批发价格。为了评估拟议合同的绩效,模型中考虑了批发合同和基本选择合同。为了获得所提出的期权收益共享协调合同问题在基于零售商状态下的纳什均衡,考虑到所提出模型的计算复杂性,提出了一种由启发式算法和遗传算法组成的混合算法。将所提出的合同与其他情况进行数值比较表明,期权收益分享合同显著主导基本期权和批发价格合同。最后,我们对合同的关键参数进行了一些数值实验。根据结果,增加需求的价格依赖性会导致零售商订购的产品数量减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信