{"title":"2,234 Descriptions of Democracy","authors":"J. Gagnon","doi":"10.3167/dt.2018.050107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2010 Milja Kurki explained that although scholars recognize\nthat democracy is described in a variety of ways, they do not typically engage\nwith its many and diverse descriptions. My aim in this agenda-setting research\nnote is to tackle this quandary by first providing a minimum empirical account\nof democracy’s descriptions (i.e., a catalogue of 2,234 adjectives that have\nbeen used to describe democracy) and secondly by suggesting what democracy\nstudies may gain by compiling this information. I argue that the catalogue\nof descriptors be applied in four ways: (1) drilling down into the meaning of\neach description, (2) making taxonomies, (3) rethinking the phenomenology\nof democracy, and (4) visualizing democracy’s big data. Each of the four applications\nand their significance is explained in turn. This research note ends by\nlooking back on the catalogue and its four applications.","PeriodicalId":42255,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/dt.2018.050107","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
In 2010 Milja Kurki explained that although scholars recognize
that democracy is described in a variety of ways, they do not typically engage
with its many and diverse descriptions. My aim in this agenda-setting research
note is to tackle this quandary by first providing a minimum empirical account
of democracy’s descriptions (i.e., a catalogue of 2,234 adjectives that have
been used to describe democracy) and secondly by suggesting what democracy
studies may gain by compiling this information. I argue that the catalogue
of descriptors be applied in four ways: (1) drilling down into the meaning of
each description, (2) making taxonomies, (3) rethinking the phenomenology
of democracy, and (4) visualizing democracy’s big data. Each of the four applications
and their significance is explained in turn. This research note ends by
looking back on the catalogue and its four applications.
期刊介绍:
Democratic Theory is a peer-reviewed journal published and distributed by Berghahn. It encourages philosophical and interdisciplinary contributions that critically explore democratic theory—in all its forms. Spanning a range of views, the journal offers a cross-disciplinary forum for diverse theoretical questions to be put forward and systematically examined. It advances non-Western as well as Western ideas and is actively based on the premise that there are many forms of democracies and many types of democrats. As a forum for debate, the journal challenges theorists to ask and answer the perennial questions that plague the field of democratization studies: Why is democracy so prominent in the world today? What is the meaning of democracy? Will democracy continue to expand? Are current forms of democracy sufficient to give voice to “the people” in an increasingly fragmented and divided world? Who leads in democracy? What types of non-Western democratic theories are there? Should democrats always defend democracy? Should democrats be fearful of de-democratization, post-democracies, and the rise of hybridized regimes?