2,234 Descriptions of Democracy

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
J. Gagnon
{"title":"2,234 Descriptions of Democracy","authors":"J. Gagnon","doi":"10.3167/dt.2018.050107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2010 Milja Kurki explained that although scholars recognize\nthat democracy is described in a variety of ways, they do not typically engage\nwith its many and diverse descriptions. My aim in this agenda-setting research\nnote is to tackle this quandary by first providing a minimum empirical account\nof democracy’s descriptions (i.e., a catalogue of 2,234 adjectives that have\nbeen used to describe democracy) and secondly by suggesting what democracy\nstudies may gain by compiling this information. I argue that the catalogue\nof descriptors be applied in four ways: (1) drilling down into the meaning of\neach description, (2) making taxonomies, (3) rethinking the phenomenology\nof democracy, and (4) visualizing democracy’s big data. Each of the four applications\nand their significance is explained in turn. This research note ends by\nlooking back on the catalogue and its four applications.","PeriodicalId":42255,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/dt.2018.050107","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In 2010 Milja Kurki explained that although scholars recognize that democracy is described in a variety of ways, they do not typically engage with its many and diverse descriptions. My aim in this agenda-setting research note is to tackle this quandary by first providing a minimum empirical account of democracy’s descriptions (i.e., a catalogue of 2,234 adjectives that have been used to describe democracy) and secondly by suggesting what democracy studies may gain by compiling this information. I argue that the catalogue of descriptors be applied in four ways: (1) drilling down into the meaning of each description, (2) making taxonomies, (3) rethinking the phenomenology of democracy, and (4) visualizing democracy’s big data. Each of the four applications and their significance is explained in turn. This research note ends by looking back on the catalogue and its four applications.
2234《民主的描述
2010年,Milja Kurki解释说,尽管学者们认识到民主有各种各样的描述,但他们通常不会参与其众多和多样化的描述。我在这篇议程设置研究报告中的目的是解决这一困境,首先提供民主描述的最低限度的经验说明(即,用于描述民主的2234个形容词的目录),其次提出民主研究可以通过汇编这些信息获得什么。我认为描述符的目录可以用四种方式来应用:(1)深入研究每个描述的含义,(2)进行分类,(3)重新思考民主的现象学,(4)将民主的大数据可视化。这四种应用程序及其意义依次进行了解释。本研究报告以回顾目录及其四个应用作为结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Democratic Theory is a peer-reviewed journal published and distributed by Berghahn. It encourages philosophical and interdisciplinary contributions that critically explore democratic theory—in all its forms. Spanning a range of views, the journal offers a cross-disciplinary forum for diverse theoretical questions to be put forward and systematically examined. It advances non-Western as well as Western ideas and is actively based on the premise that there are many forms of democracies and many types of democrats. As a forum for debate, the journal challenges theorists to ask and answer the perennial questions that plague the field of democratization studies: Why is democracy so prominent in the world today? What is the meaning of democracy? Will democracy continue to expand? Are current forms of democracy sufficient to give voice to “the people” in an increasingly fragmented and divided world? Who leads in democracy? What types of non-Western democratic theories are there? Should democrats always defend democracy? Should democrats be fearful of de-democratization, post-democracies, and the rise of hybridized regimes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信