Reconceptualizing opportunity construct: An answer to a theoretical dilemma through a systematic literature review

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS
Jahangir Yadolahi farsi, A. Arabiun
{"title":"Reconceptualizing opportunity construct: An answer to a theoretical dilemma through a systematic literature review","authors":"Jahangir Yadolahi farsi, A. Arabiun","doi":"10.17230/ad-minister.39.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After Shane’s seminal work in 2000 which highlighted the importance of entrepreneurial opportunities, the number of studies focusing on entrepreneurial opportunity increased rapidly. Different definitions of this concept were provided in the field, ranging from subjective to objective ones, which gave rise to a lack of consensus among researchers and this, in turn, was an obstacle that slowed down theorizing in entrepreneurship. Taking into account the past trends in management sciences, it seems to be the right moment to re-conceptualize the core construct of opportunity. The major critique of existing definitions is their operationalization. To provide a better operationalization, the present study aimed to offer a more accurate conceptual definition. To this end, the study first examined current debates on opportunity, which revealed the major problem causing the debates. Then, through a systematic literature review, from among more than seven thousand documents in the Scopus database containing opportunity keywords, 74 papers were selected following different phases of filtration. The papers were analyzed in detail to extract different constructs. Then, using the framework of Hansen et al, they were classified along six dimensions. The concepts under each dimension were examined to finally provide a bigger picture of the construct of opportunity and offer a re-conceptualization. The results of this study highlight the gaps for future research and pave the ground for other systematic literature reviews in the field.","PeriodicalId":42371,"journal":{"name":"AD-minister","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AD-minister","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.39.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After Shane’s seminal work in 2000 which highlighted the importance of entrepreneurial opportunities, the number of studies focusing on entrepreneurial opportunity increased rapidly. Different definitions of this concept were provided in the field, ranging from subjective to objective ones, which gave rise to a lack of consensus among researchers and this, in turn, was an obstacle that slowed down theorizing in entrepreneurship. Taking into account the past trends in management sciences, it seems to be the right moment to re-conceptualize the core construct of opportunity. The major critique of existing definitions is their operationalization. To provide a better operationalization, the present study aimed to offer a more accurate conceptual definition. To this end, the study first examined current debates on opportunity, which revealed the major problem causing the debates. Then, through a systematic literature review, from among more than seven thousand documents in the Scopus database containing opportunity keywords, 74 papers were selected following different phases of filtration. The papers were analyzed in detail to extract different constructs. Then, using the framework of Hansen et al, they were classified along six dimensions. The concepts under each dimension were examined to finally provide a bigger picture of the construct of opportunity and offer a re-conceptualization. The results of this study highlight the gaps for future research and pave the ground for other systematic literature reviews in the field.
重新定义机会结构:通过系统的文献综述回答一个理论困境
在Shane在2000年的开创性工作强调了创业机会的重要性之后,专注于创业机会的研究数量迅速增加。该领域对这一概念的定义有主观的,也有客观的,不一而足,导致研究者之间缺乏共识,这反过来又阻碍了创业理论的形成。考虑到管理科学过去的趋势,现在似乎是重新定义机会这一核心概念的恰当时机。对现有定义的主要批评是它们的操作化。为了提供一个更好的操作,本研究旨在提供一个更准确的概念定义。为此目的,该研究首先审查了目前关于机会的辩论,揭示了引起辩论的主要问题。然后,通过系统的文献综述,从Scopus数据库中包含机会关键词的7000多篇文献中,经过不同阶段的筛选,筛选出74篇论文。对论文进行了详细的分析,以提取不同的结构。然后,使用Hansen等人的框架,沿着六个维度对它们进行分类。对每个维度下的概念进行了检查,最终提供了机会结构的更大图景,并提供了重新概念化。本研究的结果突出了未来研究的空白,并为该领域的其他系统文献综述奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AD-minister
AD-minister BUSINESS-
自引率
55.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信