Listening Strategies and L2 Listening Comprehension: Does the Test Method Matter?

Q2 Social Sciences
B. Mahdavy, Masoomeh Mousavi Namavar
{"title":"Listening Strategies and L2 Listening Comprehension: Does the Test Method Matter?","authors":"B. Mahdavy, Masoomeh Mousavi Namavar","doi":"10.31261/tapsla.12097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many studies have so far tried to examine the relationship between listening strategies and listening comprehension. However, it seems that none of them have focused on the effect of the test method on the findings. The present study has investigated the issue by having 55 English language learners respond to pictorial and non-pictorial listening test items with different response formats. The listening section of the Preliminary English Test (PET) and a 36-item listening strategies questionnaire were administered in the first session and after a week’s interval, the participants took a modified version of PET listening. The data were collected in a language laboratory. Several correlation and regression tests were run to investigate the relationships between listening comprehension as measured by the original and modified PET listening tests and metacognitive, cognitive and socio-affective listening strategies. The results showed that L2 learners’ use of metacognitive listening strategies is the strongest predictor of listening performance. In addition, the findings indicated that the relationship between the use of listening strategies and listening performance is mediated by the kind of test method which is used for measuring L2 listening. Directions for future research and implications for practice are presented.","PeriodicalId":37040,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/tapsla.12097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies have so far tried to examine the relationship between listening strategies and listening comprehension. However, it seems that none of them have focused on the effect of the test method on the findings. The present study has investigated the issue by having 55 English language learners respond to pictorial and non-pictorial listening test items with different response formats. The listening section of the Preliminary English Test (PET) and a 36-item listening strategies questionnaire were administered in the first session and after a week’s interval, the participants took a modified version of PET listening. The data were collected in a language laboratory. Several correlation and regression tests were run to investigate the relationships between listening comprehension as measured by the original and modified PET listening tests and metacognitive, cognitive and socio-affective listening strategies. The results showed that L2 learners’ use of metacognitive listening strategies is the strongest predictor of listening performance. In addition, the findings indicated that the relationship between the use of listening strategies and listening performance is mediated by the kind of test method which is used for measuring L2 listening. Directions for future research and implications for practice are presented.
听力策略与二语听力理解:测试方法重要吗?
到目前为止,许多研究试图考察听力策略与听力理解之间的关系。然而,他们似乎都没有关注测试方法对结果的影响。本研究通过让55名英语学习者用不同的回答形式对图示和非图示听力测试项目进行回答来调查这一问题。在第一节课上进行了英语初步测试(PET)的听力部分和36项听力策略问卷,间隔一周后,参与者进行了PET听力的修改版。这些数据是在语言实验室收集的。进行了几个相关和回归测试,以调查通过原始和修改的PET听力测试测量的听力理解与元认知、认知和社会情感听力策略之间的关系。结果表明,二语学习者元认知听力策略的使用是听力表现的最强预测因子。此外,研究结果表明,听力策略的使用与听力表现之间的关系是由用于测量二语听力的测试方法介导的。提出了未来研究的方向和对实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition
Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信