Table, Graphic, and Diagram Interpretation and Preparation Skills: Social Studies and Geography Teachers’ Practice and Beliefs

Q3 Social Sciences
Fitnat Gürgil
{"title":"Table, Graphic, and Diagram Interpretation and Preparation Skills: Social Studies and Geography Teachers’ Practice and Beliefs","authors":"Fitnat Gürgil","doi":"10.33403/RIGEO.505266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the views of social studies and geography teachers on their table, graphic, diagram interpretation and preparation skill (TGDI-PS). In according with this study, the research was designed in the mixed method, in which both quantitative and qualitative data collection instruments were used together. The research was conducted with the participation of teachers working in Eskis ehir, I stanbul and Ankara (in Turkey) during the 2017-2018 Fall Semester. The quantitative side of the research was made with the participation of 207 teachers from the fields of geography and social studies. The qualitative side of the research was made with the participation of 5 geography and 5 social studies teachers. The data were gathered with the questionnaire and interview forms that were prepared by the researcher. As the result of the analysis of the gathered data, although the views of the teachers on their TGDI-PS were found to be positive, it was found that this did not reflect an implementation. It was concluded that the most important reference for the relevant skills is the textbooks. Furthermore, it was found that tables were given the place in the lessons of the teachers the most and it was followed by graphics, whereas diagram visuals were not given any place in their lessons. In the lessons of social studies and geography, it was found that only the level of ‘interpretation/reading’ level of TGDI-PS was performed and problems were experienced at the level of ‘preperation/drawing’. Under the light of the gathered findings, recommendations were made.","PeriodicalId":52147,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Geographical Education Online","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Geographical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33403/RIGEO.505266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to determine the views of social studies and geography teachers on their table, graphic, diagram interpretation and preparation skill (TGDI-PS). In according with this study, the research was designed in the mixed method, in which both quantitative and qualitative data collection instruments were used together. The research was conducted with the participation of teachers working in Eskis ehir, I stanbul and Ankara (in Turkey) during the 2017-2018 Fall Semester. The quantitative side of the research was made with the participation of 207 teachers from the fields of geography and social studies. The qualitative side of the research was made with the participation of 5 geography and 5 social studies teachers. The data were gathered with the questionnaire and interview forms that were prepared by the researcher. As the result of the analysis of the gathered data, although the views of the teachers on their TGDI-PS were found to be positive, it was found that this did not reflect an implementation. It was concluded that the most important reference for the relevant skills is the textbooks. Furthermore, it was found that tables were given the place in the lessons of the teachers the most and it was followed by graphics, whereas diagram visuals were not given any place in their lessons. In the lessons of social studies and geography, it was found that only the level of ‘interpretation/reading’ level of TGDI-PS was performed and problems were experienced at the level of ‘preperation/drawing’. Under the light of the gathered findings, recommendations were made.
表、图、图解读与准备技巧:社会学与地理教师的实践与信念
本研究旨在确定社会科学与地理教师对其表格、图形、图表解释与准备技能(TGDI-PS)的看法。根据本研究,本研究采用混合方法进行设计,同时使用定量和定性数据收集工具。该研究是在2017-2018年秋季学期在埃斯基斯希尔、伊斯坦布尔和安卡拉(土耳其)工作的教师的参与下进行的。定量方面的研究是由207名来自地理和社会研究领域的教师参与的。质性方面的研究由5名地理和5名社会研究教师参与。数据收集与问卷调查和访谈表格,由研究人员准备。对收集到的数据进行分析的结果是,虽然发现教师对他们的TGDI-PS的看法是积极的,但发现这并没有反映实施情况。得出的结论是,相关技能的最重要的参考是教科书。此外,我们还发现,表格在教师的课程中占据的位置最多,其次是图形,而图表视觉在他们的课程中没有任何位置。在社会研究和地理课程中,我们发现只有TGDI-PS的“解释/阅读”水平出现了问题,而“准备/绘图”水平出现了问题。根据收集到的调查结果,提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: RIGEO aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice in geography education and social studies education. It is open for rigorous research papers as well as all level teachers’ experience about good practice for geography lessons and discussion papers. RIGEO would like to lie both in theory or on research papers and practice of geography teachers’ in geography education and in addition to social studies education. RIGEO is eager to publish original papers in all aspects of geography education and social studies education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信