Interlocking, Intersecting, and Intermeshing: Critical Engagements with Black and Latina Feminist Paradigms of Identity and Oppression

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES

Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2020-02-05 DOI:10.5325/critphilrace.8.1-2.0165

Kathryn Sophia Belle

{"title":"Interlocking, Intersecting, and Intermeshing: Critical Engagements with Black and Latina Feminist Paradigms of Identity and Oppression","authors":"Kathryn Sophia Belle","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.8.1-2.0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Inspired by Mariana Ortega's invitation to reflect on diverse iterations of intersectionality, this article focuses on María Lugones's engagements with two Black feminist concepts, namely, inter-locking oppressions (as articulated by Barbara Smith, Beverley Smith, and Demita Frazier) and intersectionality (as articulated by Kimberlé Crenshaw). It explores these concepts alongside Lugones's use of her own terms such as intermeshed, curdling, multiplicity, and fusion, in several paradigm shifting essays, specifically, \"Purity, Impurity, and Separation\" (1994 and 2003), \"Tactical Strategies of the Street Walker\" (2003), \"On Complex Communication\" (2006), \"Heterosexism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System\" (2007), \"Toward a Decolonial Feminism\" (2010), \"Methodological Notes Toward a Decolonial Feminism\" (2011), and \"Radical Multiculturalism and Women of Color Feminisms\" (2014). It also underscores Ortega's important contributions bringing these Black and Latina feminist concepts together in philosophically productive ways—in a spirit of collaboration and coalition rather than zero-sum competition.","PeriodicalId":43337,"journal":{"name":"Critical Philosophy of Race","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Philosophy of Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.8.1-2.0165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract:Inspired by Mariana Ortega's invitation to reflect on diverse iterations of intersectionality, this article focuses on María Lugones's engagements with two Black feminist concepts, namely, inter-locking oppressions (as articulated by Barbara Smith, Beverley Smith, and Demita Frazier) and intersectionality (as articulated by Kimberlé Crenshaw). It explores these concepts alongside Lugones's use of her own terms such as intermeshed, curdling, multiplicity, and fusion, in several paradigm shifting essays, specifically, "Purity, Impurity, and Separation" (1994 and 2003), "Tactical Strategies of the Street Walker" (2003), "On Complex Communication" (2006), "Heterosexism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System" (2007), "Toward a Decolonial Feminism" (2010), "Methodological Notes Toward a Decolonial Feminism" (2011), and "Radical Multiculturalism and Women of Color Feminisms" (2014). It also underscores Ortega's important contributions bringing these Black and Latina feminist concepts together in philosophically productive ways—in a spirit of collaboration and coalition rather than zero-sum competition.

查看原文本刊更多论文

环环相扣，相互交织:黑人和拉丁裔女性主义的身份和压迫范式的批判性参与

摘要:受Mariana Ortega的邀请，本文关注María lugoones与两个黑人女权主义概念的接触，即互锁压迫(由Barbara Smith、Beverley Smith和Demita Frazier阐述)和交叉性(由kimberl Crenshaw阐述)。在几篇范式转换的文章中，它探讨了这些概念，以及lugoones使用她自己的术语，如交织，凝聚，多样性和融合，具体来说，“纯洁，不洁和分离”(1994年和2003年)，“街头步行者的战术策略”(2003年)，“复杂交流”(2006年)，“异性恋和殖民/现代性别系统”(2007年)，“走向非殖民化女权主义”(2010年)，“走向非殖民化女权主义的方法论笔记”(2011年)，《激进多元文化主义与有色人种女性主义》(2014)。它还强调了奥尔特加的重要贡献，她以一种合作和联盟的精神，而不是零和竞争的方式，以哲学上富有成效的方式将黑人和拉丁裔女权主义概念结合在一起。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格