New Definition of the Black Death: Genetic Findings and Historical Interpretations

IF 0.2 N/A MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
De Medio Aevo Pub Date : 2022-10-17 DOI:10.5209/dmae.83788
Monica H. Green
{"title":"New Definition of the Black Death: Genetic Findings and Historical Interpretations","authors":"Monica H. Green","doi":"10.5209/dmae.83788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of infectious disease history has been transformed in the past decade in large part because of fortuitous developments in several adjacent fields, most importantly genetics. The medieval period (ca. 500 to ca. 1500) has proved particularly important for these developments, not simply because it is now the earliest period from which whole genomes of several bacterial and viral pathogens have been retrieved, but also because the narratives that can be constructed about disease emergence and dissemination are most robust for this period thanks to the amount of surviving archival evidence. This essay introduces the transformative work in molecular biology that has allowed reconstruction of the evolutionary histories of pathogens afflicting humankind. Plague, the disease caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, has been at the forefront of this new work. An extraordinarily lethal disease, plague gives a prime example of how the evolutionary narratives of genetics yield information valuable to historians, precisely because they allow us to see phenomena at a hitherto invisible microscopic level. This essay proposes a new definition of the Black Death, or more properly, the Second Plague Pandemic, which is based on a new, evolutionary understanding of the pandemic’s pathogen. However, scientific approaches are not inherently more productive of unassailable truths than are traditional humanistic or archaeological methods for the study of disease history. The complementarity of material and cultural sources is especially fruitful for work employing the perspectives of global history. Although most historiography on the late medieval pandemic has focused on Europe, whose crisis with plague did not begin until 1347, I argue that such a limited geographic definition occludes not only as much as a century and a half of plague activity, but also occludes connected events in Asia and Africa. Given the urgency of understanding pandemics in a world of rapid change, the history of plague offers us the best available model for thinking about pandemics.","PeriodicalId":40181,"journal":{"name":"De Medio Aevo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Medio Aevo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/dmae.83788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The field of infectious disease history has been transformed in the past decade in large part because of fortuitous developments in several adjacent fields, most importantly genetics. The medieval period (ca. 500 to ca. 1500) has proved particularly important for these developments, not simply because it is now the earliest period from which whole genomes of several bacterial and viral pathogens have been retrieved, but also because the narratives that can be constructed about disease emergence and dissemination are most robust for this period thanks to the amount of surviving archival evidence. This essay introduces the transformative work in molecular biology that has allowed reconstruction of the evolutionary histories of pathogens afflicting humankind. Plague, the disease caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, has been at the forefront of this new work. An extraordinarily lethal disease, plague gives a prime example of how the evolutionary narratives of genetics yield information valuable to historians, precisely because they allow us to see phenomena at a hitherto invisible microscopic level. This essay proposes a new definition of the Black Death, or more properly, the Second Plague Pandemic, which is based on a new, evolutionary understanding of the pandemic’s pathogen. However, scientific approaches are not inherently more productive of unassailable truths than are traditional humanistic or archaeological methods for the study of disease history. The complementarity of material and cultural sources is especially fruitful for work employing the perspectives of global history. Although most historiography on the late medieval pandemic has focused on Europe, whose crisis with plague did not begin until 1347, I argue that such a limited geographic definition occludes not only as much as a century and a half of plague activity, but also occludes connected events in Asia and Africa. Given the urgency of understanding pandemics in a world of rapid change, the history of plague offers us the best available model for thinking about pandemics.
黑死病的新定义:遗传学发现和历史解释
传染病领域的历史在过去十年中发生了很大的变化,这在很大程度上是由于几个相邻领域的偶然发展,最重要的是遗传学。事实证明,中世纪时期(约500年至约1500年)对这些发展尤为重要,不仅因为这是现在最早可以检索到几种细菌和病毒病原体的全基因组的时期,还因为由于幸存的档案证据的数量,可以构建关于疾病出现和传播的叙述在这一时期是最有力的。这篇文章介绍了分子生物学的变革性工作,使病原体折磨人类的进化史得以重建。鼠疫,由鼠疫耶尔森氏菌引起的疾病,一直处于这项新工作的前沿。鼠疫是一种非常致命的疾病,它提供了一个绝佳的例子,说明遗传学的进化叙事如何为历史学家提供有价值的信息,正是因为它们让我们能够在迄今为止看不见的微观层面上观察现象。本文提出了黑死病的新定义,或者更恰当地说,第二次瘟疫大流行,这是基于对大流行病原体的新的、进化的理解。然而,科学方法本身并不比传统的人文或考古方法更能产生无懈可击的真理。物质和文化资源的互补性对运用全球历史观点的工作尤其有益。虽然大多数关于中世纪晚期大流行的史学都集中在欧洲,欧洲的鼠疫危机直到1347年才开始,但我认为,这种有限的地理定义不仅掩盖了长达一个半世纪的鼠疫活动,而且还掩盖了亚洲和非洲的相关事件。鉴于在快速变化的世界中了解流行病的紧迫性,鼠疫的历史为我们提供了思考流行病的最佳模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
De Medio Aevo
De Medio Aevo MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信