Effect of dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and recovery parameters with sevoflurane and desflurane anaesthesia in children : a double randomized study

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
R. Pandey, Jayaram A. Ankur Sharma, V. Darlong, R. Sinha, J. Punj, Sudershan Khokhar, A. Chowdhury, P. Singh
{"title":"Effect of dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and recovery parameters with sevoflurane and desflurane anaesthesia in children : a double randomized study","authors":"R. Pandey, Jayaram A. Ankur Sharma, V. Darlong, R. Sinha, J. Punj, Sudershan Khokhar, A. Chowdhury, P. Singh","doi":"10.56126/73.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Emergence delirium in pediatric patients is a significant cause of increased anxiety among parents. The incidence of emergence delirium in children varies mainly according to the anesthetic agents used.\n\nMethods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized trial, 152 children of age group 1-6 years were randomized into two groups after induction of anesthesia: Group S received Sevoflurane, and Group D received Desflurane. Children in the S group were further randomized into subgroup S- Dex (receiving dexmedetomidine 0.3 mcg/kg in 5 ml saline) and subgroup S-Saline (receiving saline 5 ml). Similarly, Group D was also randomized into two subgroups; D-Dex and D-Saline. We compared perioperative hemodynamic variables, postoperative emergence delirium, recovery profile, pain scoring, the requirement of rescue analgesics, and time to discharge.\n\nResults: At 5, 15, and 30 minutes, the incidence of emergence delirium was significantly higher in S-Saline and D-Saline groups than S-Dex and D-Dex groups. Both PAED and FLACC scores were significantly higher in the S-Saline group than the S-Dex group and the D-Saline group compared to the D-Dex group (P<0.05). Significantly more patients required analgesia in the S-Saline group than in the S-Dex group (P<0.05). No significant difference for analgesia was present between D-Saline and D-Dex groups. (p = 0.153). Discharge time was significantly longer in S-Dex and D-Dex groups as compared to S-Saline and D-saline groups.\n\nConclusions: Dexmedetomidine effectively reduced the incidence of emergence delirium and postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing surgery using Sevoflurane and Desflurane anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/73.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergence delirium in pediatric patients is a significant cause of increased anxiety among parents. The incidence of emergence delirium in children varies mainly according to the anesthetic agents used. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized trial, 152 children of age group 1-6 years were randomized into two groups after induction of anesthesia: Group S received Sevoflurane, and Group D received Desflurane. Children in the S group were further randomized into subgroup S- Dex (receiving dexmedetomidine 0.3 mcg/kg in 5 ml saline) and subgroup S-Saline (receiving saline 5 ml). Similarly, Group D was also randomized into two subgroups; D-Dex and D-Saline. We compared perioperative hemodynamic variables, postoperative emergence delirium, recovery profile, pain scoring, the requirement of rescue analgesics, and time to discharge. Results: At 5, 15, and 30 minutes, the incidence of emergence delirium was significantly higher in S-Saline and D-Saline groups than S-Dex and D-Dex groups. Both PAED and FLACC scores were significantly higher in the S-Saline group than the S-Dex group and the D-Saline group compared to the D-Dex group (P<0.05). Significantly more patients required analgesia in the S-Saline group than in the S-Dex group (P<0.05). No significant difference for analgesia was present between D-Saline and D-Dex groups. (p = 0.153). Discharge time was significantly longer in S-Dex and D-Dex groups as compared to S-Saline and D-saline groups. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine effectively reduced the incidence of emergence delirium and postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing surgery using Sevoflurane and Desflurane anesthesia.
右美托咪定对儿童七氟醚和地氟醚麻醉下出现谵妄及恢复参数的影响:一项双随机研究
背景:儿科患者突发性谵妄是家长焦虑增加的重要原因。儿童出现性谵妄的发生率主要根据所用麻醉剂的不同而不同。方法:本前瞻性、双盲、随机试验将152例1 ~ 6岁儿童在麻醉诱导后随机分为两组:S组使用七氟醚,D组使用地氟醚。S组患儿进一步随机分为S- Dex亚组(给予右美托咪定0.3 mcg/kg 5 ml生理盐水)和S- saline亚组(给予生理盐水5 ml)。同样,D组也随机分为两个亚组;D-Dex和D-Saline。我们比较围手术期血流动力学变量、术后出现谵妄、恢复情况、疼痛评分、抢救镇痛药需求和出院时间。结果:5、15、30 min时,S-Saline和D-Saline组出现谵妄的发生率明显高于S-Dex和D-Dex组。S-Saline组患者PAED、FLACC评分均显著高于S-Dex组,D-Saline组患者PAED、FLACC评分均显著高于D-Dex组(P<0.05)。S-Saline组需要镇痛的患者明显多于S-Dex组(P<0.05)。D-Saline组和D-Dex组镇痛效果无显著差异。(p = 0.153)。S-Dex组和D-Dex组出院时间明显长于S-Saline组和D-saline组。结论:右美托咪定可有效降低七氟醚和地氟醚麻醉下小儿手术患者出现谵妄和术后疼痛的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信