Quality Improvement Project to Assess the Effect of Gum Mastic Liquid Adhesive on the Integrity and Durability of Driveline Dressings, Risk of Infection, and Patient Satisfaction
{"title":"Quality Improvement Project to Assess the Effect of Gum Mastic Liquid Adhesive on the Integrity and Durability of Driveline Dressings, Risk of Infection, and Patient Satisfaction","authors":"Abigail Vowels","doi":"10.2309/java-d-23-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n \n Background: Left ventricular assist devices are connected to an external power source via a tunneled subcutaneous driveline. The risk of infection increases each time a compromised dressing is changed. Our goal was to increase dressing durability to 7 days, reduce risk of infection, and promote greater patient satisfaction. Methods: For this quality improvement project of 20 patients with a left ventricular assist device, the control group (n = 10) used a standard dressing kit but extended changes from 2 times a week to 1 time every 7 days. For the intervention group’s kit, we added gum mastic liquid adhesive and liquid adhesive remover and had 2 days of live training. Patients reported weekly.\n Results: In our project we observed an improvement in dressing integrity at 14 weeks in the intervention group versus control group: intact dressings—96% vs. 44%; edges lifting—4% vs. 48%; detachments—0% vs. 8%. Exit site skin condition was comparable, except bleeding—0% in intervention group vs. 12% in control group. Overall, 98% of intervention group reached 7-day goal (avg dressing durability = 7.01 days) vs. 32% of control group (avg = 4.9 days). Fewer dressing changes extrapolates to potential cost savings of $599.56 per patient annually. Patient understanding of the bundled procedure improved quickly: 80% of dressings were assessed as intact week 1, rising to 96% in weeks 2 to 15. Patients also commented on improved satisfaction.\n Conclusion: In our quality improvement project with gum mastic liquid adhesive and liquid adhesive remover, we observed favorable results with improved dressing integrity, fewer dressing changes, improved patient satisfaction, and reduced costs.\n","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-23-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Left ventricular assist devices are connected to an external power source via a tunneled subcutaneous driveline. The risk of infection increases each time a compromised dressing is changed. Our goal was to increase dressing durability to 7 days, reduce risk of infection, and promote greater patient satisfaction. Methods: For this quality improvement project of 20 patients with a left ventricular assist device, the control group (n = 10) used a standard dressing kit but extended changes from 2 times a week to 1 time every 7 days. For the intervention group’s kit, we added gum mastic liquid adhesive and liquid adhesive remover and had 2 days of live training. Patients reported weekly.
Results: In our project we observed an improvement in dressing integrity at 14 weeks in the intervention group versus control group: intact dressings—96% vs. 44%; edges lifting—4% vs. 48%; detachments—0% vs. 8%. Exit site skin condition was comparable, except bleeding—0% in intervention group vs. 12% in control group. Overall, 98% of intervention group reached 7-day goal (avg dressing durability = 7.01 days) vs. 32% of control group (avg = 4.9 days). Fewer dressing changes extrapolates to potential cost savings of $599.56 per patient annually. Patient understanding of the bundled procedure improved quickly: 80% of dressings were assessed as intact week 1, rising to 96% in weeks 2 to 15. Patients also commented on improved satisfaction.
Conclusion: In our quality improvement project with gum mastic liquid adhesive and liquid adhesive remover, we observed favorable results with improved dressing integrity, fewer dressing changes, improved patient satisfaction, and reduced costs.
期刊介绍:
The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.