Railway communication system; Reliability; Mean time to failure; Markov process; Sensitivity

Q1 Engineering
S. Zolfani, Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, Ramin Bazrafshan
{"title":"Railway communication system; Reliability; Mean time to failure; Markov process; Sensitivity","authors":"S. Zolfani, Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, Ramin Bazrafshan","doi":"10.31181/oresta20402140z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy-making is an undeniable decision-making process in every company where different kinds of decisions are taken based on different goals and preferences in each vision. “Prospective Multiple Attribute Decision Making (PMADM)” is one of the well-known decision-making frameworks that have been used as a flexible decision-making tool for developing policies and making future decisions over different periods. This study presents a multi attribute problem with three different visions where a decision-making process is required for each vision in order to prioritize the potential set of alternatives. Evaluation Based on the Distance from the Average Solution (EDAS) is used as a MADM model to show the applicability and feasibility of the PMADM framework. A vision-based weighting system (ViWeS) prepares a new opportunity to take proper decisions in different visions and time requirements. This research is analyzed three-time vision (Current, 2025, and 2030) and showed by changing the time, the rank of the alternatives also is changed. In numerical example is indicated in the current vision, Alternative 5 gets rank one and alternative six get rank 2, for 2025 vision, the rank one and two don’t change, and in vision 2030, the rank of one does not change, but the rank of second change from Alternative 6 to 3.","PeriodicalId":36055,"journal":{"name":"Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta20402140z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Policy-making is an undeniable decision-making process in every company where different kinds of decisions are taken based on different goals and preferences in each vision. “Prospective Multiple Attribute Decision Making (PMADM)” is one of the well-known decision-making frameworks that have been used as a flexible decision-making tool for developing policies and making future decisions over different periods. This study presents a multi attribute problem with three different visions where a decision-making process is required for each vision in order to prioritize the potential set of alternatives. Evaluation Based on the Distance from the Average Solution (EDAS) is used as a MADM model to show the applicability and feasibility of the PMADM framework. A vision-based weighting system (ViWeS) prepares a new opportunity to take proper decisions in different visions and time requirements. This research is analyzed three-time vision (Current, 2025, and 2030) and showed by changing the time, the rank of the alternatives also is changed. In numerical example is indicated in the current vision, Alternative 5 gets rank one and alternative six get rank 2, for 2025 vision, the rank one and two don’t change, and in vision 2030, the rank of one does not change, but the rank of second change from Alternative 6 to 3.
铁路通信系统;可靠性;平均失效时间;马尔可夫过程;灵敏度
政策制定是每个公司不可否认的决策过程,每个公司都会根据每个愿景中的不同目标和偏好做出不同类型的决策。“前瞻性多属性决策(PMADM)”是众所周知的决策框架之一,已被用作制定政策和在不同时期做出未来决策的灵活决策工具。这项研究提出了一个具有三种不同愿景的多属性问题,其中每个愿景都需要一个决策过程,以确定潜在备选方案的优先级。基于平均解距离的评估(EDAS)被用作MADM模型,以表明PMADM框架的适用性和可行性。基于视觉的加权系统(ViWeS)为在不同的视觉和时间要求下做出正确决策提供了新的机会。这项研究分析了三个时间愿景(当前、2025和2030),并表明通过改变时间,备选方案的排名也会发生变化。在当前愿景中的数字示例中,备选方案5排名第一,备选方案6排名第二,对于2025愿景,排名第一和第二没有变化,而在2030愿景中,排名第一没有变化,但排名第二从备选方案6变为第三。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信