Droit et soft ethics dans l’encadrement normatif de l’IA : une perspective pragmatiste

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Communitas Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.7202/1098935ar
Andréane Sabourin Laflamme, Frédérick Bruneault
{"title":"Droit et soft ethics dans l’encadrement normatif de l’IA : une perspective pragmatiste","authors":"Andréane Sabourin Laflamme, Frédérick Bruneault","doi":"10.7202/1098935ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to discuss the issues associated with artificial intelligence systems (AIS), publications in AI ethics have multiplied recently. While law and ethics work toward a common goal of fostering beneficial and responsible use of AI, these normative initiatives are distinct and must be appropriately situated in relation to each other. In this article, starting from a pragmatist perspective, we propose a reflection on the normative role of what Luciano Floridi calls “soft ethics” in relation to law. We will reflect on the characteristics it should have to play an effective normative role that is complementary to law, as well as on the internormative relations between ethics and law in the perspective of normative pluralism.","PeriodicalId":41956,"journal":{"name":"Communitas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1098935ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to discuss the issues associated with artificial intelligence systems (AIS), publications in AI ethics have multiplied recently. While law and ethics work toward a common goal of fostering beneficial and responsible use of AI, these normative initiatives are distinct and must be appropriately situated in relation to each other. In this article, starting from a pragmatist perspective, we propose a reflection on the normative role of what Luciano Floridi calls “soft ethics” in relation to law. We will reflect on the characteristics it should have to play an effective normative role that is complementary to law, as well as on the internormative relations between ethics and law in the perspective of normative pluralism.
人工智能规范框架中的法律与软伦理:实用主义视角
为了讨论与人工智能系统(AIS)相关的问题,最近关于人工智能伦理的出版物成倍增加。虽然法律和道德的共同目标是促进对人工智能的有益和负责任的使用,但这些规范性举措是不同的,必须适当地置于彼此之间。在本文中,我们从实用主义的角度出发,对卢西亚诺·弗洛里迪(Luciano Floridi)所称的“软伦理”在法律方面的规范性作用进行反思。我们将从规范多元主义的角度思考道德与法律之间的相互规范关系,以及道德在发挥与法律互补的有效规范作用所应具备的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communitas
Communitas COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信