The comparison of the coping styles between patients in ultra- high risk for psychosis state, first episode of psychosis and chronic schizophrenia.

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Katarzyna Rek-Owodziń, E. Tyburski, P. Plichta, K. Waszczuk, M. Bielecki, Krzysztof Wietrzyński, P. Podwalski, Krzysztof Rudkowski, A. Michalczyk, M. Mak
{"title":"The comparison of the coping styles between patients in ultra- high risk for psychosis state, first episode of psychosis and chronic schizophrenia.","authors":"Katarzyna Rek-Owodziń, E. Tyburski, P. Plichta, K. Waszczuk, M. Bielecki, Krzysztof Wietrzyński, P. Podwalski, Krzysztof Rudkowski, A. Michalczyk, M. Mak","doi":"10.12740/app/162950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to investigate differences in coping styles between individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis, with first episode psychosis, chronic schizophrenia and healthy controls.A total of 167 individuals with chronic schizophrenia (CHS; n=66), first episode psychosis (FEP; n=31), at ultra high risk for psychosis (UHR; n=16) and healthy controls (HC; n=54) were recruited to complete the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) to investigate their preferred coping styles. Demographic data were collected using a short self-designed questionnaire.Our results demonstrated all participants’ preference for mixed coping (i.e. a strategy in which two or three styles are applied with similar frequency). The second choice across the control group was task-oriented, and in the clinical groups - emotion-oriented coping. Interestingly, task-oriented coping was significantly more frequent in controls relative to the clinical groups, while the frequency of emotion-oriented coping did not differ significantly across our sample. Avoidance-oriented coping was reported significantly more frequently in the CHS compared to both HC and UHR.This study demonstrates differences in coping with stressful situations between patients at various stages of psychosis and healthy individuals.Therapeutic interventions for patients from the psychosis spectrum should include education on coping with stress and practical training of coping skills.","PeriodicalId":44856,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12740/app/162950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate differences in coping styles between individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis, with first episode psychosis, chronic schizophrenia and healthy controls.A total of 167 individuals with chronic schizophrenia (CHS; n=66), first episode psychosis (FEP; n=31), at ultra high risk for psychosis (UHR; n=16) and healthy controls (HC; n=54) were recruited to complete the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) to investigate their preferred coping styles. Demographic data were collected using a short self-designed questionnaire.Our results demonstrated all participants’ preference for mixed coping (i.e. a strategy in which two or three styles are applied with similar frequency). The second choice across the control group was task-oriented, and in the clinical groups - emotion-oriented coping. Interestingly, task-oriented coping was significantly more frequent in controls relative to the clinical groups, while the frequency of emotion-oriented coping did not differ significantly across our sample. Avoidance-oriented coping was reported significantly more frequently in the CHS compared to both HC and UHR.This study demonstrates differences in coping with stressful situations between patients at various stages of psychosis and healthy individuals.Therapeutic interventions for patients from the psychosis spectrum should include education on coping with stress and practical training of coping skills.
精神病状态、首发精神病和慢性精神分裂症患者应对方式的比较。
本研究的目的是调查超高精神病风险个体,首发精神病,慢性精神分裂症和健康对照者之间应对方式的差异。167名慢性精神分裂症患者(CHS;n=66),首发精神病(FEP;n=31),精神病超高风险(UHR;n=16)和健康对照(HC;(n=54)的被试完成了应激情境应对量表(CISS),以了解他们的首选应对方式。人口统计数据是用一份自行设计的简短问卷收集的。我们的结果表明,所有参与者都倾向于混合应对(即两种或三种风格以相似的频率应用的策略)。控制组的第二选择是任务导向,而临床组的第二选择是情绪导向。有趣的是,相对于临床组,任务导向的应对在对照组中明显更频繁,而情绪导向的应对频率在我们的样本中没有显著差异。逃避型应对在CHS中比在HC和UHR中更为常见。本研究展示了不同阶段精神病患者与健康个体在应对压力情境方面的差异。对精神病患者的治疗干预应包括应对压力的教育和应对技能的实践培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信