The approach to undergraduate research projects at Namibia’s first School of Medicine

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
MA Kandingo, Q. Wessels, Lnn Shipingana, Okh Katali
{"title":"The approach to undergraduate research projects at Namibia’s first School of Medicine","authors":"MA Kandingo, Q. Wessels, Lnn Shipingana, Okh Katali","doi":"10.7196/ajhpe.2023.v15i2.1690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The integration of undergraduate research (UR) in biomedical curricula has gained much interest.Objective. To investigate the research focus of compulsory UR in the medical curriculum of the University of Namibia’s School of Medicine.Methods. A retrospective mixed-methods document review was performed on 42 research projects using the 5C framework that assessed students’ abilityto Cite, Compare, Contrast, Critique and Connect in their research reports.Results. Students’ research projects focused on internal medicine (29%; n=12), paediatrics (26%; n=11), obstetrics and gynaecology (19%; n=8), surgery(10%; n=4), psychiatry (5%; n=2) and oncology (2%; n=1). A final category is other, which included health professions education and anatomy (10%; n=4).Students’ reports had aims, objectives or goals that were correctly done. Students’ review of the literature reflected their ability to cite relevant scholarlyworks and to compare these by highlighting agreements or disagreements. Contrasting and critiquing research findings proved to be challenging.Conclusion. Findings from the current study indicate variability in the degree of students’ research competence. It appears that the elements of criticalthinking and appraisal require further strengthening within the existing curriculum","PeriodicalId":43683,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/ajhpe.2023.v15i2.1690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The integration of undergraduate research (UR) in biomedical curricula has gained much interest.Objective. To investigate the research focus of compulsory UR in the medical curriculum of the University of Namibia’s School of Medicine.Methods. A retrospective mixed-methods document review was performed on 42 research projects using the 5C framework that assessed students’ abilityto Cite, Compare, Contrast, Critique and Connect in their research reports.Results. Students’ research projects focused on internal medicine (29%; n=12), paediatrics (26%; n=11), obstetrics and gynaecology (19%; n=8), surgery(10%; n=4), psychiatry (5%; n=2) and oncology (2%; n=1). A final category is other, which included health professions education and anatomy (10%; n=4).Students’ reports had aims, objectives or goals that were correctly done. Students’ review of the literature reflected their ability to cite relevant scholarlyworks and to compare these by highlighting agreements or disagreements. Contrasting and critiquing research findings proved to be challenging.Conclusion. Findings from the current study indicate variability in the degree of students’ research competence. It appears that the elements of criticalthinking and appraisal require further strengthening within the existing curriculum
纳米比亚第一医学院本科生研究项目的方法
背景。在生物医学课程中整合本科研究已引起广泛关注。探讨纳米比亚大学医学院医学课程必修UR的研究重点。使用5C框架对42个研究项目进行了回顾性混合方法的文件审查,评估了学生在研究报告中引用、比较、对比、批评和联系的能力。学生的研究项目集中在内科(29%);N =12),儿科(26%;N =11),妇产科(19%;n = 8),手术(10%;N =4),精神病学(5%;N =2)和肿瘤学(2%;n = 1)。最后一个类别是其他,包括卫生专业教育和解剖学(10%;n = 4)。学生的报告有正确完成的目的、目的或目标。学生对文献的回顾反映了他们引用相关学术著作的能力,并通过强调同意或不同意来比较这些著作的能力。对比和批判研究结果被证明是具有挑战性的。本研究结果显示,学生的研究能力程度存在差异。看来,批判性思维和评价的要素需要在现有课程中进一步加强
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Health Professions Education
African Journal of Health Professions Education HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信