Error rate and similarity determination of latent fingerprint chemistry via 1D GC and GC × GC–MS

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jessica Kindell , Candice Bridge
{"title":"Error rate and similarity determination of latent fingerprint chemistry via 1D GC and GC × GC–MS","authors":"Jessica Kindell ,&nbsp;Candice Bridge","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2023.100521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to the National Academy of Science’s report on Strengthening Forensic Science, many researchers have investigated ways of improving and supplementing pattern-based visual methods for latent fingerprint (LF) analysis. Gas chromatography (GC) has been used to study the initial and aged chemistry of latent fingerprints, along with attempting to statistically asses same source association with donor characteristics. Since LFs are composed of a complex mixture of oil, sweat, and other components, sections within the chromatographic profile that have poor resolution could benefit from better separation of components, thus yielding more associations to the correct source. This study investigates the potential of increased source association using comprehensive two-dimensional (GC × GC) and one-dimensional (1D) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Three LFs from a sample of thirteen volunteers were collected, derivatized with boron trifluoride–methanol (BF<sub>3</sub>-MeOH), and analyzed via 1D GC and GC × GC–MS. The statistical strength of source association was performed by evaluating the log likelihood ratios (LLRs) obtained from the intra- and inter-personal pairwise Pearson correlation comparisons (PCCs) and using the normal and kernel density <em>comparison</em> R functions. The 1D GC method provided stronger same-source association due to high intra-personal PCC values; however, lower inter-personal PCCs were acquired from GC × GC. Higher area under the curves (AUCs) and LLR calibration were computed for the 1D GC PCCs. Conversely, poor statistical calibration and discriminating power were obtained for both 1D GC and GC × GC methods when assessing the LLRs despite having high AUCs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170923000577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the National Academy of Science’s report on Strengthening Forensic Science, many researchers have investigated ways of improving and supplementing pattern-based visual methods for latent fingerprint (LF) analysis. Gas chromatography (GC) has been used to study the initial and aged chemistry of latent fingerprints, along with attempting to statistically asses same source association with donor characteristics. Since LFs are composed of a complex mixture of oil, sweat, and other components, sections within the chromatographic profile that have poor resolution could benefit from better separation of components, thus yielding more associations to the correct source. This study investigates the potential of increased source association using comprehensive two-dimensional (GC × GC) and one-dimensional (1D) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Three LFs from a sample of thirteen volunteers were collected, derivatized with boron trifluoride–methanol (BF3-MeOH), and analyzed via 1D GC and GC × GC–MS. The statistical strength of source association was performed by evaluating the log likelihood ratios (LLRs) obtained from the intra- and inter-personal pairwise Pearson correlation comparisons (PCCs) and using the normal and kernel density comparison R functions. The 1D GC method provided stronger same-source association due to high intra-personal PCC values; however, lower inter-personal PCCs were acquired from GC × GC. Higher area under the curves (AUCs) and LLR calibration were computed for the 1D GC PCCs. Conversely, poor statistical calibration and discriminating power were obtained for both 1D GC and GC × GC methods when assessing the LLRs despite having high AUCs.

Abstract Image

用1D GC和GC×GC-MS测定潜在指纹化学的错误率和相似度
针对美国国家科学院发布的《加强法医科学》报告,许多研究者研究了基于模式的视觉方法在潜在指纹分析中的改进和补充。气相色谱(GC)已被用于研究潜在指纹的初始化学和老化化学,并试图统计评估同一来源与供体特征的关联。由于LFs是由油、汗液和其他组分的复杂混合物组成的,因此色谱剖面中分辨率较差的部分可以从组分的更好分离中受益,从而产生更多与正确来源的关联。本研究利用综合二维(GC × GC)和一维(1D)气相色谱-质谱(GC - ms)研究了增加源关联的可能性。采用三氟化硼-甲醇(BF3-MeOH)衍生化,通过1D GC和GC × GC - ms进行分析。源关联的统计强度通过评估从个人内部和个人之间的成对Pearson相关比较(PCCs)获得的对数似然比(llr)以及使用正态和核密度比较R函数来进行。由于个人内部PCC值较高,1D GC方法提供了更强的同源关联;然而,从GC × GC中获得了较低的人际PCCs。计算了1D GC色谱柱的较高曲线下面积(auc)和LLR定标。相反,1D GC和GC × GC方法在评估llr时,尽管具有较高的auc,但其统计校准和判别能力较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信