{"title":"Error rate and similarity determination of latent fingerprint chemistry via 1D GC and GC × GC–MS","authors":"Jessica Kindell , Candice Bridge","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2023.100521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to the National Academy of Science’s report on Strengthening Forensic Science, many researchers have investigated ways of improving and supplementing pattern-based visual methods for latent fingerprint (LF) analysis. Gas chromatography (GC) has been used to study the initial and aged chemistry of latent fingerprints, along with attempting to statistically asses same source association with donor characteristics. Since LFs are composed of a complex mixture of oil, sweat, and other components, sections within the chromatographic profile that have poor resolution could benefit from better separation of components, thus yielding more associations to the correct source. This study investigates the potential of increased source association using comprehensive two-dimensional (GC × GC) and one-dimensional (1D) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Three LFs from a sample of thirteen volunteers were collected, derivatized with boron trifluoride–methanol (BF<sub>3</sub>-MeOH), and analyzed via 1D GC and GC × GC–MS. The statistical strength of source association was performed by evaluating the log likelihood ratios (LLRs) obtained from the intra- and inter-personal pairwise Pearson correlation comparisons (PCCs) and using the normal and kernel density <em>comparison</em> R functions. The 1D GC method provided stronger same-source association due to high intra-personal PCC values; however, lower inter-personal PCCs were acquired from GC × GC. Higher area under the curves (AUCs) and LLR calibration were computed for the 1D GC PCCs. Conversely, poor statistical calibration and discriminating power were obtained for both 1D GC and GC × GC methods when assessing the LLRs despite having high AUCs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170923000577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In response to the National Academy of Science’s report on Strengthening Forensic Science, many researchers have investigated ways of improving and supplementing pattern-based visual methods for latent fingerprint (LF) analysis. Gas chromatography (GC) has been used to study the initial and aged chemistry of latent fingerprints, along with attempting to statistically asses same source association with donor characteristics. Since LFs are composed of a complex mixture of oil, sweat, and other components, sections within the chromatographic profile that have poor resolution could benefit from better separation of components, thus yielding more associations to the correct source. This study investigates the potential of increased source association using comprehensive two-dimensional (GC × GC) and one-dimensional (1D) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Three LFs from a sample of thirteen volunteers were collected, derivatized with boron trifluoride–methanol (BF3-MeOH), and analyzed via 1D GC and GC × GC–MS. The statistical strength of source association was performed by evaluating the log likelihood ratios (LLRs) obtained from the intra- and inter-personal pairwise Pearson correlation comparisons (PCCs) and using the normal and kernel density comparison R functions. The 1D GC method provided stronger same-source association due to high intra-personal PCC values; however, lower inter-personal PCCs were acquired from GC × GC. Higher area under the curves (AUCs) and LLR calibration were computed for the 1D GC PCCs. Conversely, poor statistical calibration and discriminating power were obtained for both 1D GC and GC × GC methods when assessing the LLRs despite having high AUCs.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.