Erratum to “The ‘placebo’ paradox and the emotion paradox: Challenges to psychological explanation”

IF 1.1 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Theory & Psychology Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI:10.1177/09593543221103822

引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fundamental emotion paradox: People are compelltements that we might together label “the dilemma of adequate explanation.” by their own experiences to believe that emotions exist as natural-kind entities, yet a century of research has not produced a strong evidentiary basis for this belief. To date, there is no clear, unambiguous criterion for indicating the presence of anger or sadness or fear. (Barrett, 2006, p. 27)

查看原文本刊更多论文

“安慰剂悖论和情绪悖论：对心理学解释的挑战”勘误表

一个基本的情感悖论:人是一种强迫，我们可以把它统称为“充分解释的困境”。，相信情感是自然存在的实体，然而一个世纪的研究并没有为这一信念提供强有力的证据基础。到目前为止，还没有明确、明确的标准来表明愤怒、悲伤或恐惧的存在。(巴雷特，2006年，第27页)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Theory & Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Theory & Psychology is a fully peer reviewed forum for theoretical and meta-theoretical analysis in psychology. It focuses on the emergent themes at the centre of contemporary psychological debate. Its principal aim is to foster theoretical dialogue and innovation within the discipline, serving an integrative role for a wide psychological audience. Theory & Psychology publishes scholarly and expository papers which explore significant theoretical developments within and across such specific sub-areas as: cognitive, social, personality, developmental, clinical, perceptual or biological psychology.