Artists Running: Fifty Years of Scottish Cultural Devolution

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Dan Brown, D. Jackson, N. Mulholland
{"title":"Artists Running: Fifty Years of Scottish Cultural Devolution","authors":"Dan Brown, D. Jackson, N. Mulholland","doi":"10.1080/14714787.2018.1474131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is just over fifty years since the Arts Council of Great Britain (ACGB) devolved the governance and subsidy of Scotland’s arts from London to Edinburgh. Dan Brown, Deborah Jackson and Neil Mulholland discuss how artists, curators, arts administrators and the Scottish Arts Council (SAC) learned to cohabit. They examine the tensions between the SAC’s Keynesian values, Scotland’s emerging artist-run organizational culture and its long-established Unionist-nationalist arts institutions. What changes and challenges did the cultural devolution of the late 1960s precipitate in Scotland’s contemporary art and what impact did this have upon the political devolution that followed in 1999?","PeriodicalId":35078,"journal":{"name":"Visual Culture in Britain","volume":"19 1","pages":"139 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14714787.2018.1474131","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Culture in Britain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14714787.2018.1474131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

It is just over fifty years since the Arts Council of Great Britain (ACGB) devolved the governance and subsidy of Scotland’s arts from London to Edinburgh. Dan Brown, Deborah Jackson and Neil Mulholland discuss how artists, curators, arts administrators and the Scottish Arts Council (SAC) learned to cohabit. They examine the tensions between the SAC’s Keynesian values, Scotland’s emerging artist-run organizational culture and its long-established Unionist-nationalist arts institutions. What changes and challenges did the cultural devolution of the late 1960s precipitate in Scotland’s contemporary art and what impact did this have upon the political devolution that followed in 1999?
艺术家奔跑:苏格兰文化权力下放五十年
50多年前,英国艺术委员会(ACGB)将苏格兰艺术的管理和补贴从伦敦移交给爱丁堡。丹·布朗、黛博拉·杰克逊和尼尔·穆赫兰讨论了艺术家、策展人、艺术管理者和苏格兰艺术委员会(SAC)是如何学会同居的。他们研究了SAC的凯恩斯主义价值观、苏格兰新兴的艺术家经营的组织文化和历史悠久的联合主义民族主义艺术机构之间的紧张关系。20世纪60年代末的文化权力下放给苏格兰当代艺术带来了哪些变化和挑战?这对随后1999年的政治权力下放产生了什么影响?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Visual Culture in Britain
Visual Culture in Britain Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信