On the role of the US in EU-Japan relations: Is trilateralism still on agenda?

IF 0.1 Q4 AREA STUDIES
M. P. Chizhevskaya
{"title":"On the role of the US in EU-Japan relations: Is trilateralism still on agenda?","authors":"M. P. Chizhevskaya","doi":"10.55105/2500-2872-2022-2-80-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to analyzing the contemporary configuration of relations inside the triad of the US, the European Union, and Japan, often addressed to as trilateral relations. The ‘three pillars’ theory, which is acknowledged to be a root of the trilateralism concept, was originally introduced by the Japanese Prime Minister Ikeda Hayato during his visit to Paris in 1962. Later, in the 1980s, it was developed by the Japanese diplomat Owada Hisashi, known for his active participation in the Hague declaration preparatory process. This concept was widely used by researchers in the 1990–2000s to explain current EU-Japan relations and their place in world politics. Indeed, it seems natural to develop cooperation between the participants of the so-called ‘triangle’, which dominated the world economically and shared common values of democracy, human rights, and free trade. Meanwhile, although the Transatlantic and Transpacific relations were highly developed due to security cooperation, the Japan-EU relations during the whole post-war period were far less advanced and thus were often called a ‘weak side’ of the triangle. Today, when the US is actively promoting new alliances in the Indo-Pacific region, engaging Australia and India, and the economic predominance of the three economies is challenged by China, addressing this triangle scheme as a working political relations model can be put in doubt.The article argues that, presently, it is difficult to interpret the triangle as a working political model, which is characterized by mutual interdependence of the three engaging actors. The author looks at the roots of this concept, analyzes the reasons why it was the Japanese side who offered such a vision of the US-EC-Japan relations, the role of the US in Japan-Western Europe relations. After considering the decisions of the D. Trump and J. Biden administrations towards their ‘junior partners’, the author concludes that inconsistent, difficult to forecast policy of the Trump administration led to the strengthening of the EU-Japan relationship, which gives reason to point to a certain extent of interdependence between the participants of the triangle. However, the Biden administration’s policy, which seems to be more consistent, but short of idealism towards its allies, has not significantly influenced the EU-Japan relations so far. Rather, it opened the way to search for new partnerships. The conclusion of a defense pact between Japan and Australia in January 2022 is a good example of this process, showing that the partners’ choice is dictated not by a necessity to develop ‘trilateral’ relations, but by pragmatic assessment of effectiveness of this or that partnership.","PeriodicalId":53811,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Studies in Russia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Studies in Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55105/2500-2872-2022-2-80-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is devoted to analyzing the contemporary configuration of relations inside the triad of the US, the European Union, and Japan, often addressed to as trilateral relations. The ‘three pillars’ theory, which is acknowledged to be a root of the trilateralism concept, was originally introduced by the Japanese Prime Minister Ikeda Hayato during his visit to Paris in 1962. Later, in the 1980s, it was developed by the Japanese diplomat Owada Hisashi, known for his active participation in the Hague declaration preparatory process. This concept was widely used by researchers in the 1990–2000s to explain current EU-Japan relations and their place in world politics. Indeed, it seems natural to develop cooperation between the participants of the so-called ‘triangle’, which dominated the world economically and shared common values of democracy, human rights, and free trade. Meanwhile, although the Transatlantic and Transpacific relations were highly developed due to security cooperation, the Japan-EU relations during the whole post-war period were far less advanced and thus were often called a ‘weak side’ of the triangle. Today, when the US is actively promoting new alliances in the Indo-Pacific region, engaging Australia and India, and the economic predominance of the three economies is challenged by China, addressing this triangle scheme as a working political relations model can be put in doubt.The article argues that, presently, it is difficult to interpret the triangle as a working political model, which is characterized by mutual interdependence of the three engaging actors. The author looks at the roots of this concept, analyzes the reasons why it was the Japanese side who offered such a vision of the US-EC-Japan relations, the role of the US in Japan-Western Europe relations. After considering the decisions of the D. Trump and J. Biden administrations towards their ‘junior partners’, the author concludes that inconsistent, difficult to forecast policy of the Trump administration led to the strengthening of the EU-Japan relationship, which gives reason to point to a certain extent of interdependence between the participants of the triangle. However, the Biden administration’s policy, which seems to be more consistent, but short of idealism towards its allies, has not significantly influenced the EU-Japan relations so far. Rather, it opened the way to search for new partnerships. The conclusion of a defense pact between Japan and Australia in January 2022 is a good example of this process, showing that the partners’ choice is dictated not by a necessity to develop ‘trilateral’ relations, but by pragmatic assessment of effectiveness of this or that partnership.
关于美国在欧日关系中的作用:三边主义仍在议程上吗?
本文致力于分析美国、欧盟和日本三边关系的当代格局,这些关系通常被称为三边关系。被认为是三边主义概念基础的“三支柱”理论最初是由日本首相池田大作在1962年访问巴黎时提出的。后来,在20世纪80年代,以积极参与海牙宣言筹备进程而闻名的日本外交官小和田久史(Owada Hisashi)发展了这一概念。这一概念在20世纪90年代至21世纪初被研究人员广泛用于解释当前欧盟与日本的关系及其在世界政治中的地位。事实上,在所谓“三角”的参与者之间发展合作似乎是很自然的,这一三角在经济上主导着世界,并拥有民主、人权和自由贸易的共同价值观。与此同时,尽管由于安全合作,跨大西洋和跨太平洋关系得到了高度发展,但在整个战后时期,日欧关系远未发展,因此经常被称为三角关系的“弱势一方”。今天,当美国积极推动在印太地区的新联盟,与澳大利亚和印度接触,以及三个经济体的经济优势受到中国的挑战时,将这一三角计划作为一种有效的政治关系模式可能会受到质疑。本文认为,目前很难将三角关系解释为一种有效的政治模式,其特点是三个参与方相互依存。本文探讨了这一概念产生的根源,分析了为什么是日本方面提出了这样一种美、欧、日关系愿景,以及美国在日本-西欧关系中的作用。在考虑了特朗普政府和拜登政府对其“初级伙伴”的决定后,作者得出结论,特朗普政府不一致的、难以预测的政策导致了欧盟与日本关系的加强,这就有理由指出三角关系参与者之间存在一定程度的相互依存关系。然而,拜登政府的政策似乎更加一致,但对盟友缺乏理想主义,迄今为止并未对欧日关系产生重大影响。相反,它为寻求新的合作伙伴关系开辟了道路。日本和澳大利亚于2022年1月签署的防务协议就是这一进程的一个很好的例子,表明合作伙伴的选择不是由发展“三边”关系的必要性决定的,而是由对这种或那种伙伴关系有效性的务实评估决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信