On Aeschylus’ Fragment 429a Radt (= 599a Mette)

IF 0.7 2区历史学 0 CLASSICS

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1086/718646

M. Sandri

引用次数: 0

Abstract

New evidence provided by MS Barocci 68 proves that Aeschylus’ fragment 429a Radt is to be excluded from future editions. The deletion of frag. 429a Radt is not without consequences for a textual issue in Aeschylus’ frag. 164 Radt.

查看原文本刊更多论文

论埃斯库罗斯的片段429a Radt（=599a Mette）

Barocci女士68提供的新证据证明，埃斯库罗斯的片段429a Radt将被排除在未来的版本之外。frag。429a Radt对埃斯库罗斯的frag中的文本问题并非没有后果。164 Radt。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.