Reliability and Validity Testing of the Assessment of the Environment for Person-Centered Management of BPSD and Assessment of Policies for Person-Centered Management of BPSD Measures.

IF 1.1 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
B. Resnick, A. Kolanowski, K. Van Haitsma, E. Galik, M. Boltz, Shijun Zhu, Jeanette Ellis, Liza L. Behrens, Karen Eshraghi, Nicole Viviano, Y. Jao
{"title":"Reliability and Validity Testing of the Assessment of the Environment for Person-Centered Management of BPSD and Assessment of Policies for Person-Centered Management of BPSD Measures.","authors":"B. Resnick, A. Kolanowski, K. Van Haitsma, E. Galik, M. Boltz, Shijun Zhu, Jeanette Ellis, Liza L. Behrens, Karen Eshraghi, Nicole Viviano, Y. Jao","doi":"10.1080/02763893.2019.1683670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Assessment of the Environment for Person-Centered Management of BPSD and the Assessment of Policies for Person-Centered Management of BPSD. The sample included 35 long term care facilities. There was evidence of reliability based on internal consistency and test-retest reliability of both measures. There was some evidence of validity based on Rasch model testing and INFIT and OUTFIT statistics. Across both measures there were six items with that were endorsed as present by all facilities. The INFIT and OUTFIT statistics were all within the expected range of .5 to 1.5 with the exception of four high OUTFIT statistics for the Assessment of the Environment for Person-Centered Management of BPSD. For the Assessment of Policies for Person-Centered Management of BPSD there were two items that had high INFIT statistics and six with low OUTFIT statistics and one with high OUTFIT statistics. Measure revisions are suggested including removal of some poor fitting items, items with no variance, and adding items to differentiate those very high in evidence of environments and policies that manage BPSD.","PeriodicalId":36333,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Environment","volume":"34 3 1","pages":"310-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02763893.2019.1683670","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2019.1683670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Assessment of the Environment for Person-Centered Management of BPSD and the Assessment of Policies for Person-Centered Management of BPSD. The sample included 35 long term care facilities. There was evidence of reliability based on internal consistency and test-retest reliability of both measures. There was some evidence of validity based on Rasch model testing and INFIT and OUTFIT statistics. Across both measures there were six items with that were endorsed as present by all facilities. The INFIT and OUTFIT statistics were all within the expected range of .5 to 1.5 with the exception of four high OUTFIT statistics for the Assessment of the Environment for Person-Centered Management of BPSD. For the Assessment of Policies for Person-Centered Management of BPSD there were two items that had high INFIT statistics and six with low OUTFIT statistics and one with high OUTFIT statistics. Measure revisions are suggested including removal of some poor fitting items, items with no variance, and adding items to differentiate those very high in evidence of environments and policies that manage BPSD.
BPSD以人为本管理环境评估和BPSD措施以人为本管理政策评估的信度和有效性测试。
本研究的目的是检验《以人为本的心理疾病管理环境评估》和《以人为本的心理疾病管理政策评估》的信度和效度。样本包括35家长期护理机构。基于内部一致性和两种测量的重测信度,有信度的证据。基于Rasch模型检验和INFIT和OUTFIT统计,有一些有效性的证据。在这两项措施中,有六个项目得到所有设施的认可。INFIT和OUTFIT统计数据均在0.5至1.5的预期范围内,除了以人为本的BPSD管理环境评估的四个高OUTFIT统计数据。在“以人为本的BPSD管理政策评估”中,有2个项目的INFIT统计值高,6个项目的OUTFIT统计值低,1个项目的OUTFIT统计值高。建议对测量进行修订,包括删除一些不合适的项目,没有差异的项目,并增加项目来区分那些非常高的环境证据和管理BPSD的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging and Environment
Journal of Aging and Environment Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信