Effect of partial replacement of aggregate with granulated polyethylene terephthalate (pet) on compressive strength of concrete

O. Orie, O.J. Olusesi
{"title":"Effect of partial replacement of aggregate with granulated polyethylene terephthalate (pet) on compressive strength of concrete","authors":"O. Orie, O.J. Olusesi","doi":"10.4314/njt.v42i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is aimed at the development of appropriate combination of composite materials such as cement, aggregates and inclusion of Polyethylene  Terephthalate (PET) in varying proportion in order to determine the optimal measure for the optimal strength. The study also, investigated the effect of  PET aggregate on the compressive strength of concrete. Mix design targeting grade 25 concrete strength, using the Department of Environment (DOE)  approach was adopted. Five different concrete samples were prepared accordingly, using natural aggregate as control mix and four others which consist  of PET aggregate as partial replacement of fine aggregate at 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% ratios respectively. The recycled fine aggregate (PET) was processed  from bottle water waste, it was crushed, pressed and processed into finely material having river sand resemblance i.e., well distributed within sieve sizes  of 0.075 and 2.00. The batching was done by weight. Cubes specimens were prepared, cured for 7, 14, and 28days and tested for compression. The  results of the tests were analyzed statistically using regression method (Mintab) to establish optimal strength require mixture. The results and analysis  established that there were reduction in compressive strength of the concrete containing PET aggregate and reduction rates increased with increase in  the amount of PET inclusion in the concrete. The compressive strength values for 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% replacement of sand with PET at 28-day were 29.70N/mm2 , 25.95N/mm2 , 24.28N/mm2 and 23.23N/mm2 respectively. When compared with the control concrete specimens with an average value of  33.08N/mm2 gave 11.38%, 27.48%, 36.24% and 42.40% reduction in strength respectively. It was recommended that, though, the use of PET aggregate in  the production of concrete does not have significant appreciable effect on the concrete strength, its use will protect the environment and as well help  to conserve natural resources used as materials in production of concrete elements which currently undergo excessive depletion. ","PeriodicalId":33360,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v42i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is aimed at the development of appropriate combination of composite materials such as cement, aggregates and inclusion of Polyethylene  Terephthalate (PET) in varying proportion in order to determine the optimal measure for the optimal strength. The study also, investigated the effect of  PET aggregate on the compressive strength of concrete. Mix design targeting grade 25 concrete strength, using the Department of Environment (DOE)  approach was adopted. Five different concrete samples were prepared accordingly, using natural aggregate as control mix and four others which consist  of PET aggregate as partial replacement of fine aggregate at 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% ratios respectively. The recycled fine aggregate (PET) was processed  from bottle water waste, it was crushed, pressed and processed into finely material having river sand resemblance i.e., well distributed within sieve sizes  of 0.075 and 2.00. The batching was done by weight. Cubes specimens were prepared, cured for 7, 14, and 28days and tested for compression. The  results of the tests were analyzed statistically using regression method (Mintab) to establish optimal strength require mixture. The results and analysis  established that there were reduction in compressive strength of the concrete containing PET aggregate and reduction rates increased with increase in  the amount of PET inclusion in the concrete. The compressive strength values for 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% replacement of sand with PET at 28-day were 29.70N/mm2 , 25.95N/mm2 , 24.28N/mm2 and 23.23N/mm2 respectively. When compared with the control concrete specimens with an average value of  33.08N/mm2 gave 11.38%, 27.48%, 36.24% and 42.40% reduction in strength respectively. It was recommended that, though, the use of PET aggregate in  the production of concrete does not have significant appreciable effect on the concrete strength, its use will protect the environment and as well help  to conserve natural resources used as materials in production of concrete elements which currently undergo excessive depletion. 
聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯颗粒部分替代骨料对混凝土抗压强度的影响
本文旨在开发水泥、骨料和不同比例的聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)包合物等复合材料的适当组合,以确定最佳强度的最佳措施。研究了PET骨料对混凝土抗压强度的影响。配合比设计以25级混凝土强度为目标,采用美国环境部(DOE)的方法。以天然骨料为对照配合比,以PET骨料为部分替代细骨料的配合比分别为5%、10%、15%和20%,配制了5种不同的混凝土试样。以瓶水废料为原料,经粉碎、压制、加工成类似河砂的细碎物料,在0.075和2.00筛粒范围内均匀分布。配料是按重量计量的。制备立方体标本,分别固化7、14和28天,并进行压缩测试。采用回归方法(Mintab)对试验结果进行统计分析,以确定最佳强度要求混合物。结果与分析表明,含PET骨料的混凝土抗压强度降低,且降低率随混凝土中PET掺入量的增加而增加。PET置换5%、10%、15%和20%砂的28天抗压强度值分别为29.70N/mm2、25.95N/mm2、24.28N/mm2和23.23N/mm2。与平均值为33.08N/mm2的对照混凝土试件相比,强度分别降低11.38%、27.48%、36.24%和42.40%。有人建议,虽然在混凝土生产中使用PET骨料对混凝土强度没有明显的影响,但它的使用将保护环境,并有助于保存用作生产混凝土元素的材料的自然资源,这些资源目前正在过度枯竭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信