Modelos de avaliação em saúde mental: entre fatores de risco e fatores de proteção

G. Valente, E. Cortez, Carlos Sequeira
{"title":"Modelos de avaliação em saúde mental: entre fatores de risco e fatores de proteção","authors":"G. Valente, E. Cortez, Carlos Sequeira","doi":"10.11144/JAVERIANA.IE20-2.MASM","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To identify and analyze existing models of evaluation of risk factors and protective factors related to mental health. Method: An systematic review of the literature survey, conducted in: Medline, Lilacs and Pubmed. Results: 119 potential studies were selected by extracting 63 instruments that met the inclusion criteria, leaving 27 instruments available online for free access. Conclusion: It is noted that it was not always possible to obtain the original instrument available, which composes a limitation to the study. Thus, caution is recommended when comparing the individual characteristics of the instruments and it is recommended that a specific instrument is designed to assess the mental health of many human groups.","PeriodicalId":31363,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion en Enfermeria Imagen y Desarrollo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion en Enfermeria Imagen y Desarrollo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/JAVERIANA.IE20-2.MASM","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify and analyze existing models of evaluation of risk factors and protective factors related to mental health. Method: An systematic review of the literature survey, conducted in: Medline, Lilacs and Pubmed. Results: 119 potential studies were selected by extracting 63 instruments that met the inclusion criteria, leaving 27 instruments available online for free access. Conclusion: It is noted that it was not always possible to obtain the original instrument available, which composes a limitation to the study. Thus, caution is recommended when comparing the individual characteristics of the instruments and it is recommended that a specific instrument is designed to assess the mental health of many human groups.
心理健康评估模型:风险因素与保护因素之间的关系
目的:识别和分析与心理健康相关的危险因素和保护因素的现有评估模型。方法:系统回顾Medline、Lilacs和Pubmed上的文献调查。结果:通过提取符合纳入标准的63种仪器,筛选出119项潜在研究,剩余27种仪器可在线免费获取。结论:值得注意的是,并非总能获得可用的原始仪器,这构成了研究的局限性。因此,建议在比较这些工具的个别特征时要谨慎,并建议设计一种特定的工具来评估许多人类群体的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信