DIVERSITY PATTERNS OF RODENT ASSEMBLAGES IN THE NORTH OF FAZAO-MALFAKASSA NATIONAL PARK (TOGO)

Q3 Environmental Science
L. Luiselli, Amétépé Hounmavo, Délagnon Assou, Abré Sonhaye-Ouyé, Mawunya Komi Gbemou, Florence Afi Konko, Abdou-Rachad Ayewa, G. Segniagbeto, G. Ketoh, D. Dendi, G. Amori
{"title":"DIVERSITY PATTERNS OF RODENT ASSEMBLAGES IN THE NORTH OF FAZAO-MALFAKASSA NATIONAL PARK (TOGO)","authors":"L. Luiselli, Amétépé Hounmavo, Délagnon Assou, Abré Sonhaye-Ouyé, Mawunya Komi Gbemou, Florence Afi Konko, Abdou-Rachad Ayewa, G. Segniagbeto, G. Ketoh, D. Dendi, G. Amori","doi":"10.17161/eurojecol.v9i1.17947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rodent assemblages were studied in different habitat types in the northern part of the Fazao-Malfakassa National Park located in central-western Togo, West Africa. A suite of different methods was applied, including face-by-face interviews with local hunters, live trapping along standardized transects and opportunistic observations. A total of 20 rodent species were recorded based on the surveys carried out in villages, including 6 families and 17 genera. There was a clear gradient pattern in the univariate diversity indices by habitat type: Dominance index was remarkably higher in Urban/plantation than in the other habitat types whereas Evenness index was remarkably higher in gallery forest than in the other habitat types. According to a Canonical Correspondence Analysis, three “ecological groups” (= guilds) of species were formed: a group from wooded habitats (savannahs and semiforests), a group from grassy savannah and a group from urban/plantation habitats. Null model analyses revealed that species tend to non-randomly congregate in some habitat types and/or localities. The ecological implications of these data were presented.","PeriodicalId":37280,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ecology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/eurojecol.v9i1.17947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The rodent assemblages were studied in different habitat types in the northern part of the Fazao-Malfakassa National Park located in central-western Togo, West Africa. A suite of different methods was applied, including face-by-face interviews with local hunters, live trapping along standardized transects and opportunistic observations. A total of 20 rodent species were recorded based on the surveys carried out in villages, including 6 families and 17 genera. There was a clear gradient pattern in the univariate diversity indices by habitat type: Dominance index was remarkably higher in Urban/plantation than in the other habitat types whereas Evenness index was remarkably higher in gallery forest than in the other habitat types. According to a Canonical Correspondence Analysis, three “ecological groups” (= guilds) of species were formed: a group from wooded habitats (savannahs and semiforests), a group from grassy savannah and a group from urban/plantation habitats. Null model analyses revealed that species tend to non-randomly congregate in some habitat types and/or localities. The ecological implications of these data were presented.
多哥fazao-malfakassa国家公园北部鼠类群落多样性格局
对西非多哥中西部法扎奥-马尔法卡萨国家公园北部不同生境类型的啮齿动物种群进行了研究。采用了一套不同的方法,包括与当地猎人面对面访谈,沿着标准化样带进行现场诱捕和机会观察。调查共记录鼠类20种,隶属6科17属。不同生境类型的单变量多样性指数存在明显的梯度格局:城市/人工林的优势度指数显著高于其他生境类型,廊道林的均匀度指数显著高于其他生境类型。根据规范对应分析,物种形成了三个“生态群体”(=公会):一个来自树木繁茂的栖息地(稀树草原和半森林),一个来自草原的群体和一个来自城市/人工林栖息地的群体。零模型分析表明,在某些生境类型和/或地点,物种倾向于非随机聚集。提出了这些数据的生态学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Ecology
European Journal of Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信