Invasive alien species and biodiversity: impacts and management

Q3 Environmental Science
R. Gentili, U. Schaffner, A. Martinoli, S. Citterio
{"title":"Invasive alien species and biodiversity: impacts and management","authors":"R. Gentili, U. Schaffner, A. Martinoli, S. Citterio","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2021.1929484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As far back as the 18th century, many naturalists including Augustin Pyramus De Candolle and Charles Darwin, observed the phenomenon of non-native species. These were defined as ‘species outside of their bioregion which can possibly threaten native ones (De Candolle 1855; Darwin 1859; Pyšek et al. 2004). It was however only after the 1950s that scientists became aware that biological invasions can have a deleterious effect on habitats and ecosystems (Elton 1958; Macdonald and Jarman 1984; Davis 2009). The ‘father’ of invasion biology, Charles Elton, defined biological invasions as ‘ecological explosions’ meaning ‘the enormous increase in number of some organism’ in newly invaded ranges (Elton 1958). A combination of colonial rule, rapid economic development and increasing global trade exchanges across continents and borders have had a key role in human-mediated movement of propagules and species and have led to the subsequent establishment of non-native species in new regions outside their natural range (Turbelin et al. 2017). Indeed, the number of new recordings of invasive alien species (IAS) have incessantly increased worldwide during the last 200 years, but more than a third of all first introductions were recorded between 1970 and 2014 (Seebens et al. 2017). Over the last 30 years, numerous studies have demonstrated the negative effect of IAS on native biodiversity from the genetic (e.g. interspecific hybridization) to the ecosystem and landscape level (Largiadèr 2008; Kumschick et al. 2015; Lazzaro et al. 2020; Viciani et al. 2020). Today, biological invasions are considered among the main drivers causing biodiversity loss and species extinctions in the major plant and animal taxa across the world (IUCN 2017; Dueñas et al. 2021). Particularly, according to Bellard et al. (2016), IAS are the second most frequent threat connected with species’ extinction events since 1500. Besides biodiversity loss, the most recent literature on IAS has pointed out that these species have negative impacts on agriculture, ecosystem services and human well-being (including human health), ultimately causing serious economic problems (Pejchar and Mooney 2009; McGeoch et al. 2010; Paini et al. 2016). Economic damages due to IAS should include costs related to the direct damage caused by the species as well as those to be ascribed to their prevention, control and management (Marbuah et al. 2014). Even though environmental issues caused by IAS are recognized worldwide, knowledge on their current and future impacts on native biodiversity is still largely unknown (Downey and Richardson 2016; Essl et al. 2020). Numerous IAS can colonize, with different strengths, ecosystems in different bioregions of the world; whilst on the other hand, biological invasions are a continuous phenomenon and so far only observed for too short a period (i.e. mainly over the last century) to really understand the response of the native species assemblages and ecosystems. Yet, the management of the most invasive alien species is still challenging or an unsolved problem all over the world. For precisely these reasons, at Biodiversity journal, we felt it was high time we curated a themed issue, sharing examples from around the globe, on Invasive Alien Species and Biodiversity: Impacts and Management. Throughout, we have tried to provide new insights into such an important, and yet still under-studied area of research and scientific practice. In The spread of exotic fishes in the Italian rivers and their effect on native fish fauna during the last three decades the authors analysed 30-years of data recording (1985–2014) of fishes in Italy (BioFresh Project) with the aim to investigate the effects of introduced alien fish species on native species. The results showed that the richness of alien species is still increasing in Italy, while native species are decreasing. In addition, the invasion of the rivers in the Continental and Mediterranean biogeographic regions of Italy has induced more changes at the community level than the invasion of rivers in the Alpine region. Knowledge around IAS in the marine environment is still scarce. The synthesis Marine alien species: a challenge to biodiversity conservation in Marine Protected Areas. The case study of the Egadi Islands MPA (Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy) provides an insight into the management of IAS across Marine Protected Areas of the Mediterranean region describing the spread dynamics and future trends of nonindigenous organisms. Potential risks of invasive alien plant species on native plant biodiversity in Sri Lanka under climate change, Champika investigates the implications of the potential distribution of plant invasions on native biodiversity under climate change using a species’ modelling approach. Biodiversity-rich zones are at potentially BIODIVERSITY 2021, VOL. 22, NOS. 1–2, 1–3 https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2021.1929484","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"22 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14888386.2021.1929484","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2021.1929484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

As far back as the 18th century, many naturalists including Augustin Pyramus De Candolle and Charles Darwin, observed the phenomenon of non-native species. These were defined as ‘species outside of their bioregion which can possibly threaten native ones (De Candolle 1855; Darwin 1859; Pyšek et al. 2004). It was however only after the 1950s that scientists became aware that biological invasions can have a deleterious effect on habitats and ecosystems (Elton 1958; Macdonald and Jarman 1984; Davis 2009). The ‘father’ of invasion biology, Charles Elton, defined biological invasions as ‘ecological explosions’ meaning ‘the enormous increase in number of some organism’ in newly invaded ranges (Elton 1958). A combination of colonial rule, rapid economic development and increasing global trade exchanges across continents and borders have had a key role in human-mediated movement of propagules and species and have led to the subsequent establishment of non-native species in new regions outside their natural range (Turbelin et al. 2017). Indeed, the number of new recordings of invasive alien species (IAS) have incessantly increased worldwide during the last 200 years, but more than a third of all first introductions were recorded between 1970 and 2014 (Seebens et al. 2017). Over the last 30 years, numerous studies have demonstrated the negative effect of IAS on native biodiversity from the genetic (e.g. interspecific hybridization) to the ecosystem and landscape level (Largiadèr 2008; Kumschick et al. 2015; Lazzaro et al. 2020; Viciani et al. 2020). Today, biological invasions are considered among the main drivers causing biodiversity loss and species extinctions in the major plant and animal taxa across the world (IUCN 2017; Dueñas et al. 2021). Particularly, according to Bellard et al. (2016), IAS are the second most frequent threat connected with species’ extinction events since 1500. Besides biodiversity loss, the most recent literature on IAS has pointed out that these species have negative impacts on agriculture, ecosystem services and human well-being (including human health), ultimately causing serious economic problems (Pejchar and Mooney 2009; McGeoch et al. 2010; Paini et al. 2016). Economic damages due to IAS should include costs related to the direct damage caused by the species as well as those to be ascribed to their prevention, control and management (Marbuah et al. 2014). Even though environmental issues caused by IAS are recognized worldwide, knowledge on their current and future impacts on native biodiversity is still largely unknown (Downey and Richardson 2016; Essl et al. 2020). Numerous IAS can colonize, with different strengths, ecosystems in different bioregions of the world; whilst on the other hand, biological invasions are a continuous phenomenon and so far only observed for too short a period (i.e. mainly over the last century) to really understand the response of the native species assemblages and ecosystems. Yet, the management of the most invasive alien species is still challenging or an unsolved problem all over the world. For precisely these reasons, at Biodiversity journal, we felt it was high time we curated a themed issue, sharing examples from around the globe, on Invasive Alien Species and Biodiversity: Impacts and Management. Throughout, we have tried to provide new insights into such an important, and yet still under-studied area of research and scientific practice. In The spread of exotic fishes in the Italian rivers and their effect on native fish fauna during the last three decades the authors analysed 30-years of data recording (1985–2014) of fishes in Italy (BioFresh Project) with the aim to investigate the effects of introduced alien fish species on native species. The results showed that the richness of alien species is still increasing in Italy, while native species are decreasing. In addition, the invasion of the rivers in the Continental and Mediterranean biogeographic regions of Italy has induced more changes at the community level than the invasion of rivers in the Alpine region. Knowledge around IAS in the marine environment is still scarce. The synthesis Marine alien species: a challenge to biodiversity conservation in Marine Protected Areas. The case study of the Egadi Islands MPA (Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy) provides an insight into the management of IAS across Marine Protected Areas of the Mediterranean region describing the spread dynamics and future trends of nonindigenous organisms. Potential risks of invasive alien plant species on native plant biodiversity in Sri Lanka under climate change, Champika investigates the implications of the potential distribution of plant invasions on native biodiversity under climate change using a species’ modelling approach. Biodiversity-rich zones are at potentially BIODIVERSITY 2021, VOL. 22, NOS. 1–2, 1–3 https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2021.1929484
外来入侵物种与生物多样性:影响与管理
早在18世纪,许多博物学家,包括奥古斯丁·皮拉摩斯·德·坎多尔和查尔斯·达尔文,就观察到了非本地物种的现象。这些物种被定义为“可能威胁到本地物种的生物区域之外的物种”(De Candolle 1855;达尔文1859年;Pyšek et al. 2004)。然而,直到20世纪50年代之后,科学家们才意识到生物入侵会对栖息地和生态系统产生有害影响(Elton 1958;Macdonald and Jarman 1984;2009年戴维斯)。入侵生物学之父查尔斯·埃尔顿(Charles Elton)将生物入侵定义为“生态爆炸”,即在新入侵的范围内“某些生物数量的巨大增加”(Elton 1958)。殖民统治、快速的经济发展以及跨大陆和边境的全球贸易交流的增加,在人类介导的繁殖体和物种的运动中发挥了关键作用,并导致随后在其自然范围以外的新地区建立了非本地物种(Turbelin等人,2017)。事实上,在过去200年中,世界范围内外来入侵物种(IAS)的新记录数量不断增加,但超过三分之一的首次引入是在1970年至2014年期间记录的(Seebens et al. 2017)。在过去的30年里,许多研究已经证明了外来入侵对本地生物多样性的负面影响,从遗传(如种间杂交)到生态系统和景观水平(largiad 2008;Kumschick et al. 2015;Lazzaro et al. 2020;Viciani et al. 2020)。今天,生物入侵被认为是导致世界各地主要动植物分类群生物多样性丧失和物种灭绝的主要驱动因素之一(IUCN 2017;Dueñas et al. 2021)。特别是,根据Bellard等人(2016)的研究,自1500年以来,IAS是与物种灭绝事件相关的第二常见威胁。除了生物多样性丧失之外,最近关于IAS的文献指出,这些物种对农业、生态系统服务和人类福祉(包括人类健康)产生负面影响,最终造成严重的经济问题(Pejchar和Mooney 2009;McGeoch et al. 2010;Paini et al. 2016)。外来入侵生物造成的经济损失应包括与该物种造成的直接损害相关的成本,以及归因于其预防、控制和管理的成本(Marbuah et al. 2014)。尽管IAS引起的环境问题在世界范围内得到公认,但其对本地生物多样性当前和未来影响的知识仍在很大程度上是未知的(唐尼和理查森2016;Essl et al. 2020)。许多外来入侵生物可以以不同的优势在世界不同生物区域的生态系统中殖民;另一方面,生物入侵是一个持续的现象,到目前为止只观察到很短的一段时间(即主要是在上个世纪),无法真正了解本地物种组合和生态系统的反应。然而,对最具侵略性的外来物种的管理在世界范围内仍然是一个具有挑战性或未解决的问题。正是由于这些原因,在《生物多样性》杂志上,我们觉得是时候策划一个主题问题了,分享来自全球各地的例子,《外来入侵物种和生物多样性:影响和管理》。在整个过程中,我们试图为这样一个重要的,但仍未充分研究的研究和科学实践领域提供新的见解。在《过去三十年来意大利河流中外来鱼类的传播及其对本地鱼类动物群的影响》一书中,作者分析了意大利鱼类(生物新鲜项目)30年的数据记录(1985-2014),目的是调查引进的外来鱼类对本地物种的影响。结果表明,意大利外来物种的丰富度仍在增加,而本地物种的丰富度却在减少。此外,意大利大陆和地中海生物地理区的河流入侵比阿尔卑斯地区的河流入侵更能引起群落层面的变化。关于海洋环境中IAS的知识仍然很少。海洋外来物种的合成:对海洋保护区生物多样性保护的挑战。对埃加迪群岛海洋保护区(意大利第勒尼安海)的案例研究提供了对地中海地区海洋保护区IAS管理的深入了解,描述了非本地生物的传播动态和未来趋势。在气候变化背景下,外来入侵植物物种对斯里兰卡本土植物多样性的潜在风险,Champika利用物种建模方法研究了气候变化下植物入侵的潜在分布对斯里兰卡本土生物多样性的影响。生物多样性富集区位于潜在生物多样性2021,VOL. 22, no .1 - 2,1 - 3 https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2021.1929484
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biodiversity
Biodiversity Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The aim of Biodiversity is to raise an appreciation and deeper understanding of species, ecosystems and the interconnectedness of the living world and thereby avoid the mismanagement, misuse and destruction of biodiversity. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, news items, opinion pieces, experiences from the field and book reviews, as well as running regular feature sections. Articles are written for a broad readership including scientists, educators, policy makers, conservationists, science writers, naturalists and students. Biodiversity aims to provide an international forum on all matters concerning the integrity and wellness of ecosystems, including articles on the impact of climate change, conservation management, agriculture and other human influence on biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信