The Consulship of 367 bc and the Evolution of Roman Military Authority*

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Antichthon Pub Date : 2017-10-26 DOI:10.1017/ann.2017.9
Jeremy Armstrong
{"title":"The Consulship of 367 bc and the Evolution of Roman Military Authority*","authors":"Jeremy Armstrong","doi":"10.1017/ann.2017.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A tension exists within the literary sources for early Rome, between the supposedly static nature of military authority, embodied by the grant of imperium which was allegedly shared both by archaic reges and republican magistrates, and the evidence for change within Rome’s military hierarchy, with the early republican army being commanded by a succession of different magistrates including the archaic praetores, the so-called ‘consular tribunes,’ and the finally the consuls and praetors of the mid-fourth century BC. The differences between the magistracies and the motivations driving the evolution of the system have caused confusion for both ancient and modern writers alike, with the usual debate being focused on the number of officials involved under each system and Rome’s expanding military and bureaucratic needs. The present study will argue that, far more than just varying in number, when viewed against the wider backdrop of Roman society during the period, the sources hint that the archaic praetores and consular tribunes might have exercised slightly different types of military authority – possibly distinguished by the designations imperium and potestas – which were unified under the office of the consulship of 367 BC. 1 The changes in Rome’s military hierarchy during the fifth and fourth centuries BC may therefore not only indicate an expansion of Rome’s military command, as is usually argued, but also an evolution of military authority within Rome associated with the movement of power from the comitia curiata to the comitia centuriata.","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"51 1","pages":"124 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ann.2017.9","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ann.2017.9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract A tension exists within the literary sources for early Rome, between the supposedly static nature of military authority, embodied by the grant of imperium which was allegedly shared both by archaic reges and republican magistrates, and the evidence for change within Rome’s military hierarchy, with the early republican army being commanded by a succession of different magistrates including the archaic praetores, the so-called ‘consular tribunes,’ and the finally the consuls and praetors of the mid-fourth century BC. The differences between the magistracies and the motivations driving the evolution of the system have caused confusion for both ancient and modern writers alike, with the usual debate being focused on the number of officials involved under each system and Rome’s expanding military and bureaucratic needs. The present study will argue that, far more than just varying in number, when viewed against the wider backdrop of Roman society during the period, the sources hint that the archaic praetores and consular tribunes might have exercised slightly different types of military authority – possibly distinguished by the designations imperium and potestas – which were unified under the office of the consulship of 367 BC. 1 The changes in Rome’s military hierarchy during the fifth and fourth centuries BC may therefore not only indicate an expansion of Rome’s military command, as is usually argued, but also an evolution of military authority within Rome associated with the movement of power from the comitia curiata to the comitia centuriata.
公元前367年的总督与罗马军事权力的演变*
在早期罗马的文学资料中,存在着一种紧张关系,一方面是军事权威的静态性质,体现在古代统治者和共和法官共同享有的统治权,另一方面是罗马军事等级制度发生变化的证据,早期共和军队由一系列不同的法官指挥,包括古代裁判官,所谓的"领事保民官"最后是公元前4世纪中期的执政官和裁判官。行政长官之间的差异以及推动这一制度演变的动机引起了古代和现代作家的困惑,通常的争论集中在每个制度下涉及的官员数量以及罗马不断扩大的军事和官僚需求上。本研究将论证,在这一时期罗马社会的大背景下,远不只是数量上的不同,资料来源暗示,古代的裁判官和领事保民官可能行使的军事权力类型略有不同——可能以imperium和potestas的名称来区分——它们在公元前367年统一在执政官的办公室之下。因此,公元前5世纪和4世纪罗马军事等级制度的变化可能不仅表明了罗马军事指挥的扩张,正如通常所说的那样,而且还表明了罗马内部军事权威的演变,这与权力从库里亚委员会向百人委员会的转移有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信