Book Review: Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing by Sarah Brayne

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Marianne Quirouette
{"title":"Book Review: Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing by Sarah Brayne","authors":"Marianne Quirouette","doi":"10.1177/13624806221101007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"suggests, however, rather than decreasing the number of asylum seekers, deterrent measures only contribute to exacerbate the dangers travelers face in and around border zones, while doing little to discourage the movement of those who feel pressured to leave their homes worrying about the consequences later. The political death of asylum may sound as the theoretically most engaging of the three, evinced by the general populace accepting and abetting the politics of exclusions. It is now accepted that the journey a person shall endure to obtain asylum may entail precarity, exclusion, liminality and legal struggle, over many months of limbo during which the “normal” is suspended and the body becomes the border. Asylum seekers are quietly cast aside socially, while a mixture of law, geography and psychology is astutely used to strategically undermine certain people from landing on sovereign soil where asylum is customarily assured but tacitly denied. When the general public turns a blind eye; when we uncritically buy the crisis rhetoric that criminalizes certain arrivals for their mode of traveling; when we deny violence in the face of evidence; when we, intentionally or subconsciously, feel that certain lives are more grievable than others, then the institution of asylum is weakened and its political death assured. The vast evidence collected in this book certainly supports, and visually maps, the many advances this monograph makes for scholars and students in the criminology of mobility, state crime and citizenship studies. Asylum seekers are made precarious by geographical design and the death of asylum does not occur simply on islands and in remote borderlands of the enforcement archipelago, but more acutely in the treatment of people as islands, within law and geopolitical machinations in the interstitial spaces between states. If a limitation can be noted in this book, it would be its emphasis on the Global North and the costly and perilous journey asylum seekers undertake to reach North America, Europe and Australia. More than a weakness, this may indeed sound like a suggestion to expand the enforcement archipelago to include geographies such as in Asia that may not traditionally appear as prominent and yet are often turned into literal and existential carceral spaces. Here, life and the personal histories of certain individuals are grossly devalued, while the asylum process is seldom treated as more than a loophole in legislation if not a magnet for ill-intended migrants displaced by geographical shifts in migration enforcement and new configurations of power. Their immobility in these spaces threatens their identity and morphs territorial borders to cause the death of asylum.","PeriodicalId":47813,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Criminology","volume":"26 1","pages":"519 - 522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221101007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

suggests, however, rather than decreasing the number of asylum seekers, deterrent measures only contribute to exacerbate the dangers travelers face in and around border zones, while doing little to discourage the movement of those who feel pressured to leave their homes worrying about the consequences later. The political death of asylum may sound as the theoretically most engaging of the three, evinced by the general populace accepting and abetting the politics of exclusions. It is now accepted that the journey a person shall endure to obtain asylum may entail precarity, exclusion, liminality and legal struggle, over many months of limbo during which the “normal” is suspended and the body becomes the border. Asylum seekers are quietly cast aside socially, while a mixture of law, geography and psychology is astutely used to strategically undermine certain people from landing on sovereign soil where asylum is customarily assured but tacitly denied. When the general public turns a blind eye; when we uncritically buy the crisis rhetoric that criminalizes certain arrivals for their mode of traveling; when we deny violence in the face of evidence; when we, intentionally or subconsciously, feel that certain lives are more grievable than others, then the institution of asylum is weakened and its political death assured. The vast evidence collected in this book certainly supports, and visually maps, the many advances this monograph makes for scholars and students in the criminology of mobility, state crime and citizenship studies. Asylum seekers are made precarious by geographical design and the death of asylum does not occur simply on islands and in remote borderlands of the enforcement archipelago, but more acutely in the treatment of people as islands, within law and geopolitical machinations in the interstitial spaces between states. If a limitation can be noted in this book, it would be its emphasis on the Global North and the costly and perilous journey asylum seekers undertake to reach North America, Europe and Australia. More than a weakness, this may indeed sound like a suggestion to expand the enforcement archipelago to include geographies such as in Asia that may not traditionally appear as prominent and yet are often turned into literal and existential carceral spaces. Here, life and the personal histories of certain individuals are grossly devalued, while the asylum process is seldom treated as more than a loophole in legislation if not a magnet for ill-intended migrants displaced by geographical shifts in migration enforcement and new configurations of power. Their immobility in these spaces threatens their identity and morphs territorial borders to cause the death of asylum.
Sarah Brayne的书评:《预测与调查:数据、自由裁量权和警务的未来》
然而,这表明,威慑措施非但没有减少寻求庇护者的数量,反而只会加剧旅行者在边境地区及其周围面临的危险,而对那些感到有压力离开家园、担心日后后果的人的行动几乎没有起到阻止作用。庇护的政治死亡听起来可能是三者中理论上最具吸引力的,这一点从普通民众接受和教唆排斥政治中可以看出。现在人们普遍认为,一个人为获得庇护而经历的旅程可能会带来不稳定、排斥、边缘化和法律斗争,在这几个月里,“正常”状态被暂停,身体成为边界。寻求庇护者在社会上被悄悄地抛弃,而法律、地理和心理的混合被巧妙地用来战略性地阻止某些人登陆主权领土,在那里庇护通常得到保证,但却被默许。当公众睁一只眼闭一只眼;当我们不加批判地相信将某些入境者的旅行方式定为犯罪的危机言论时;当我们在证据面前否认暴力;当我们有意或潜意识地觉得某些生命比其他生命更容易受到伤害时,庇护制度就会被削弱,其政治死亡也就得到了保证。这本书中收集的大量证据无疑支持并直观地描绘了这本专著为学者和学生在流动犯罪学、国家犯罪和公民身份研究方面取得的许多进展。寻求庇护者因地理设计而变得不稳定,庇护的死亡不仅仅发生在岛屿和执法群岛的偏远边境地区,更严重的是,在法律和国家之间间隙的地缘政治阴谋中,人们被视为岛屿。如果说这本书有局限性的话,那就是它强调了全球北方以及寻求庇护者前往北美、欧洲和澳大利亚的昂贵而危险的旅程。这不仅仅是一个弱点,听起来确实像是一个建议,要扩大执法群岛,将亚洲等传统上可能不那么突出的地区包括在内,但这些地区往往会变成文字和存在的尸体空间。在这里,某些人的生活和个人历史被严重贬低,而庇护程序很少被视为立法中的一个漏洞,如果不是吸引因移民执法的地理变化和新的权力结构而流离失所的恶意移民的话。他们在这些空间的不动威胁到他们的身份,并改变了领土边界,导致庇护者死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theoretical Criminology
Theoretical Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Consistently ranked in the top 12 of its category in the Thomson Scientific Journal Citation Reports, Theoretical Criminology is a major interdisciplinary, international, peer reviewed journal for the advancement of the theoretical aspects of criminological knowledge. Theoretical Criminology is concerned with theories, concepts, narratives and myths of crime, criminal behaviour, social deviance, criminal law, morality, justice, social regulation and governance. The journal is committed to renewing general theoretical debate, exploring the interrelation of theory and data in empirical research and advancing the links between criminological analysis and general social, political and cultural theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信