Socrates’ Tomb in Antisthenes’ Kyrsas and its Relationship with Plato’s Phaedo

Pub Date : 2022-06-29 DOI:10.1163/18725473-bja10023
Menahem Luz
{"title":"Socrates’ Tomb in Antisthenes’ Kyrsas and its Relationship with Plato’s Phaedo","authors":"Menahem Luz","doi":"10.1163/18725473-bja10023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Socrates’ burial is dismissed as philosophically irrelevant in Phaedo 115c-e although it had previously been discussed by Plato’s older contemporaries. In Antisthenes’ Kyrsas dialogue describes a visit to Socrates’ tomb by a lover of Socrates who receivesprotreptic advice in a dream sequence while sleeping over Socrates’ grave. The dialogue is a metaphysical explanation of how Socrates’ spiritual message was continued after death. Plato underplays this metaphorical imagery by lampooning Antisthenes philosophy and his work (Phd. 81b-82e) and subsequently precludes him from an active role in the Phaedo. A similar case is the exclusion of Euclides of Megara. Fragments of a lost Socratic dialogue depict Apollodorus citing an unnamed Megarian in order to justify care for the remains of the dead. Similar mistaken notions explain Kyrsas’ belief when he lusts after Socrates even though he was dead. In spite of these disputes, the philosophers (Euclides, Antisthenes and Plato) each attempted to present Socrates’ moral influence as a force that continued after his death and burial.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18725473-bja10023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socrates’ burial is dismissed as philosophically irrelevant in Phaedo 115c-e although it had previously been discussed by Plato’s older contemporaries. In Antisthenes’ Kyrsas dialogue describes a visit to Socrates’ tomb by a lover of Socrates who receivesprotreptic advice in a dream sequence while sleeping over Socrates’ grave. The dialogue is a metaphysical explanation of how Socrates’ spiritual message was continued after death. Plato underplays this metaphorical imagery by lampooning Antisthenes philosophy and his work (Phd. 81b-82e) and subsequently precludes him from an active role in the Phaedo. A similar case is the exclusion of Euclides of Megara. Fragments of a lost Socratic dialogue depict Apollodorus citing an unnamed Megarian in order to justify care for the remains of the dead. Similar mistaken notions explain Kyrsas’ belief when he lusts after Socrates even though he was dead. In spite of these disputes, the philosophers (Euclides, Antisthenes and Plato) each attempted to present Socrates’ moral influence as a force that continued after his death and burial.
分享
查看原文
苏格拉底在安提斯尼的墓及其与柏拉图的《斐多篇》的关系
苏格拉底的葬礼在《斐多篇》115c-e中被认为与哲学无关而不予考虑,尽管柏拉图的同代人之前曾讨论过这个问题。在安提斯尼的《基萨斯的对话》中,描述了苏格拉底的一个情人去苏格拉底的坟墓,他在苏格拉底的坟墓前睡觉时,在梦中得到了一个神秘的建议。这段对话是对苏格拉底死后精神信息如何继续的形而上学解释。柏拉图通过讽刺安提斯尼的哲学和他的作品(博士学位81b-82e)淡化了这种隐喻意象,并随后排除了他在斐多篇中的积极作用。一个类似的例子是欧几里得斯被排除在外。在一段遗失的苏格拉底对话片段中,阿波罗多罗斯引用了一位不知名的米加利安人的话,以证明对死者遗体的照顾是合理的。类似的错误观念解释了基萨斯的信仰,他渴望苏格拉底,即使他已经死了。尽管存在这些争议,哲学家们(欧几里得、安提斯尼和柏拉图)都试图将苏格拉底的道德影响呈现为一种在他死后和埋葬后继续存在的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信